Value Pluralism in Ian McEwan’s Black Dogs and Saturday

Keywords: politics, ideology, liberalism, liberal pluralism, value pluralism

Abstract


Ian McEwan, an influential and provocative British novelist and short-story writer, has addressed a variety of issues, distinguishing himself as a socially and politically engaged author. This paper explores contemporary liberalism as depicted in two of McEwan’s novels, Black Dogs and Saturday, both charged with moral complexity. The analysis is approached from the perspective of value pluralism, which recognises the plurality of morally correct yet incompatible and incommensurable principles or values. These values may conflict with each other, but since all are correct, the conflicts remain unresolved. It is the author’s belief that the novels highlight value pluralism through characters who, while navigating a pluralist environment, disclose the challenges and limitations of liberal democracies. The theoretical context this paper relies on is based on ideas of Isaiah Berlin and his notion of value pluralism.

References

Berlin, I. (2002). John Stuart Mill and the ends of life. In: I. Berlin, Liberty (2nd ed.) (H. Hardy, Ed.) (pp. 218–251). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1959). https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989x.001.0001

Berlin, I. (2002). Two concepts of liberty. In: I. Berlin, Liberty (2nd ed.) (H. Hardy, Ed.) (pp. 166–217). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1969). https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989x.001.0001

Berlin, I. (2013). The originality of Machiavelli. In: I. Berlin, Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas (2nd ed.) (H. Hardy, Ed.) (pp. 33–100). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1972). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400843237-007

Bradley, A., & Tate, A. (2010). The New Atheist Novel: Fiction, Philosophy and Polemic after 9/11. London: Bloomsberry Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472542830

Cohen, N. (2014). Ian McEwan: A Novel Approach to Political Communication (Doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/26407

Gilroy, P. (2005). Postcolonial Melancholia. Columbia University Press.

Goodbody, A., & Rigby, K. (Eds.). (2011). Ecocritical Theory: New European Approaches. Virginia: University of Virginia Press.

Hardy, H. (2002). The editor’s tale. In: I. Berlin, Liberty (2nd ed.) (H. Hardy, Ed.) (pp. ix–xxxiii). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989x.001.0001

Hillard, M. C. (2008). “When desert armies stand ready to fight”: Re-reading McEwan’s Saturday and Arnold’s Dover Beach. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 6(1), 181–206. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pan.2008.0008

Kovačević, P. (2016). Laži liberalizma u delima Ijana Makjuana. Kultura, 150, 91–114. https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura1650091K

Lukács, G. (1920). The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. First published by P. Cassirer, Berlin.

McEwan, I. (1992). Black Dogs. UK: Vintage.

McEwan, I. (2002). “Faith and Doubt at Ground Zero.” Interview with Ian McEwan conducted by FRONTLINE producer Helen Whitney, April 2002. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/faith/interviews/mcewan.html

McEwan, I. (2005). Saturday. London: Johnathan Cape.

Nešić, M. (2022). Is a life saved by a court order really a life saved? Art as an alternative to the renounced religion in Ian McEwan’s The Children Act. In: V. Lopičić & B. Mišić Ilić (Eds.), Language, Literature, Alternatives (pp. 335–346). Niš: Faculty of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.46630/jkal.2022.23

Petrović, L. (2017). Literature in Context: Selected Essays 2000–2015. Niš: Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Nišu.

Tučev, N. (2007). “The left hand of God”: Revolution and spirituality in Ian McEwan’s Black Dogs. U: Lj. Milosavljević (ur.), Interkatedarska konferencija anglističkih katedri – zbornik radova (pp. 1–11). Niš: Univerzitet u Nišu, Filozofski fakultet.

Zakaras, A. (2013). A liberal pluralism: Isaiah Berlin and John Stuart Mill. The Review of Politics, 75(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670512001325

Published
2024/10/08
Section
Original Scientific Paper