Paths and Dead Ends of Critical Race Theory

  • Boris R. Bratina University of Priština in Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy
Keywords: racism, race, Critical Race Theory, emancipation, anti-essentialism

Abstract


This paper introduces the reader to the fundamentals of Critical Race Theory, which is highly influential today. The author accomplishes this not only by simply introducing the reader to the most important aspects of this relatively new teaching but also by examining each of them critically. Throughout his presentation, the author discusses all of the major influences on the development of this theory, starting with Marxism, (post)structuralism, and legal practice as a source of facticity. According to him, this academic-activist movement has at least three basic theoretical propositions: 1) the thesis about institutionalized racism in the United States from its founding to the present, 2) the thesis that race is not a biological but a cultural concept and, accordingly, the advocacy of anti-essentialism, and 3) thesis and decision to expand Critical Race Theory by introducing minorities (most notably, sexual minorities) into the game. The paper critically examines the idea that racism stems from skin colour, as well as the movement’s decision to seek support outside the circle of racism-related problems. This expansion blunts both CRT’s theoretical edge and its practical application, as evidenced by the fate of anti-racist and emancipatory movements. Finally, the author demonstrates how the entire movement conforms to the ruling racial system.

References

Братина, Б. (2021). Постистина – нова стара лаж. Социолошки преглед, 55 (4), 1505–1525. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg55-34726

Дерида, Ж. (1976). О граматологији. Сарајево: ИП „Веселин Маслеша”.

Лиотар, Ж. (1988). Постмодерно стање. Нови Сад: „Братство Јединство”.

Badiou, A. (2009). Logic of Worlds. London – New York: Continuum.

Bell, D. (1980). Brown v. board of education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Hardward Law Review, 93(3), 518–533.

Bell, D. (1992). Racial realism. Connecticut Law Review, 24(2), 363–379.

Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015). More than prejudice: Restatement, reflections, and new directions in critical race theory. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 75–89.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. London: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.

Cole, M. (2017). New Developments in Critical Race Theory and Education. New York: The Palgrave Macmillan.

Crenshaw, K. W. (2019). Unmasking colorblindness in the law: Lessons from the formation of critical race theory. In: K. W. Crenshaw, L. C. Harris, D. M. HoSang, & G. Lipsitz (Eds.), Seeing Race Again: Countering Colorblindness Across the Disciplines (pp. 52–84). Oakland, California: University of California Press.

Danewid, I. (2020). The fire this time: Grenfell, racial capitalism, and the urbanisation of empire. European Journal of International Relations, 26(1), 289–313.

Delgado, R., & Stefančić, J. (2006). From Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. Retrieved August 4, 2022, from: https://jordaninstituteforfamilies.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Delgado_and_Stefancic_on_Critical_Race_Theory.pdf

Hartlep, N. D. (2009). Critical Race Theory: An Examination of Its Past, Present and Future Implications. Retrieved August 12, 2022, from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506735.pdf

Martinez, A. (2014). Critical race theory: Its origins, history, and importance to the discourses and rhetorics of race. Frame, 27, 9–27.

Sakamoto, A., Hsu, I., & Jalufka, M. (2022). Comparing the effect of class origin versus race in the integrational transmission of poverty. Social Science, 11, 257–267.

Stepan, N., & Gilman, S. (1993). Appropriating the idioms of science: The rejection of scientific racism. In: S. Harding (Ed.), The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future (pp. 170–193). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Published
2024/06/30
Section
Original Scientific Paper