Metaphor and Metonymy in Euphemisms in Queen Elizabeth II’s Official Statements
Abstract
Though well recognised as devices used in the formation of euphemisms, metaphor and metonymy as such remain under-researched in current literature. Our study examines the use of euphemistic language in the official speeches and statements of the former British monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. The goal is to identify euphemisms and explain the metaphors and metonymies used in their formation, drawing on the Conceptual Metaphor and Metonymy Theory and Critical Metaphor Analysis. Metaphor and metonymy account for the formation of most of the analysed euphemisms. We argue that the analysed metaphors are motivated by the ideological concepts of (a) the struggle for survival and (b) materialism, as well as by the intent to positively evaluate certain political and everyday endeavours. The analysed metonymies are motivated by the intent to highlight more desirable or less undesirable aspects of events and things.
References
Ahmad, S. (2018). The language of war: Loss gain metaphorical framing in the context of the war on terror. Central Asia Journal, 83(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-83.33
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881
Bedell Smith, S. (2012). Elizabeth the Queen: The Life of a Modern Monarch. London: Random House.
Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis—Journal in English Lexicology, 7, 65–92. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123898
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612
Collins English Dictionary (30th anniversary ed./10th ed.). (2009). HarperCollins.
Craiker, K. N. (2022). The Queen Best Speeches: Learning from Royal Rhetoric. https://prowritingaid.com/queen-s-best-speeches
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2006). The language of death: Euphemism and conceptual metaphorization in Victorian obituaries. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 19, 101–130.
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2008). Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism: An analysis in terms of conceptual metaphor theory. Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 30(2), 95–110.
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2015). Sex in Language: Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums. London: Bloomsbury.
Crystal, D. (1984). Who Cares About English Usage? Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Dirven, R. (2003). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisation. In: R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 75–112). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.1.75
Evans, V. (2007). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748629862
Fabiszak, M. (2007). A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to War Discourse and Its Implications. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/510
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350
Gorčević A., & Dazdarević, S. (2016). Eufemizam – atribut engleskog jezika u političkim novinskim člancima o imigraciji. Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, 14, 125–149. https://folia.ucg.ac.me/image/folia_14.pdf#page=125
Gorčević, A. R., Dazdarević, S. N., & Lukač Zoranić, A. (2021). Dysphemisms in animated films. Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, 35, 175–194. https://doi:10.31902/fll.35.2021.9
Gradečak-Erdeljić, T., & Milić, G. (2011). Metonymy at the crossroads. In: R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View (pp. 147–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.08gra
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Jakobson, R. (2002). The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In: R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 41–48). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.1.41
Kövecses, Z. (Ed.) (2006). Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195187205.001.0001
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 202–251). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173865.013
Lakoff, G. (2013). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Cognitive Semiotics, 4(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2009.4.2.5
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107338814
Lutz, W. (2000). Nothing in life is certain except negative patient outcome and revenue enhancement. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(3), 231. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40012181
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (1996). To die, to sleep: A contrastive study of metaphors for death and dying in English and Spanish. Language Sciences, 18(1–2), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00006-XGet rights and content
Mihas, E. (2005). Non-literal language in political discourse. In: R. Shields (Ed.), LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 5: Proceedings of WIGL 2005 (pp. 124–139). Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Moritz, I. (2018). 3. Metonymy-based euphemisms in war-related speeches by George W. Bush and Barack Obama. In: A. Pizarro Pedraza (Ed.), Linguistic Taboo Revisited. Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives (pp. 55–78). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110582758-004
Neaman, J. S., & Silver, C. G. (1983). Kind Words: A Thesaurus of Euphemisms. New York: Facts on File Publications.
Owiredu, C. (2020). Metaphors and euphemisms of death in Akan and Hebrew. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10(4), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2020.104024
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. (Eds). (1999). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2004). The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. Metaphorik.de, 6, 91–116.
Pimlott, B. (1996). The Queen: Elizabeth II and the Monarchy. New York: HarperCollins.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (2007). Towards a theory of metonymy. In: V. Evans, B. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader (pp. 335–359). London: Equinox. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
Rawson, H. (1981). A Dictionary of Euphemisms and Other Doubletalk. New York: Crown Publisher.
Silaški, N. (2011). Metaphors and euphemisms – the case of death in English and Serbian. Filološki pregled, 38 (2), 101–113.
Steen, G. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved!. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. https://doi:10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
Steen, G. (2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001
Sullivan, K., & Sweetser, E. (2009). Is “generic is specific” a metaphor? In: F. Parrill, V. Tobin, & M. Turner (Eds.), Meaning, Form and Body: Selected Papers from the 2008 CSDL Meeting (pp. 309–327). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1552584
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: