Scaffolding Language Teacher Education: Criteria-Based Evaluation of Language Practice Activities
Abstract
This paper addresses the development of a key teacher competence—activity evaluation, as well as adaptation and design—to cater for mixed-ability classes. In the context of English as a foreign language (EFL) teacher education, the question is how early, within what framework, and under what procedures students should be taught this competence. Practicum teaching at university has been found to lack in validity, learner-centeredness, and heterogeneity, be it at the level of an activity, a series of activities, a lesson, or a series of lessons. Action research was conducted to address this issue, basing a part of an introductory English Language Teaching (ELT) methods course on developing students’ awareness and putting into practice Ur’s seven principles of activity conceptualisation, with a particular focus on validity, volume, and heterogeneity. The students were asked to apply these principles in teaching mock-up lessons to their peers and to analyse to what extent the principles qualified their peers’ lessons and the practice of in-service teachers they observed in primary and secondary schools. The content analysis of the students’ reports shows the majority both comprehended and consistently applied most of the principles, while a small number demonstrated a proper and thorough understanding of all the criteria, consistently and correctly applying them in their observation reports and in designing and teaching their mock-up lessons. Very few students consistently adopted some of the concepts incorrectly or non-specifically. No comprehensive analysis is offered of how the students’ mock-up lessons were guided by the activity evaluation criteria explored. It remains to be seen if and to what extent students apply the principles in the final-year practicum, after criteria-based activity evaluation, adaptation, and design are integrated in their second ELT methods course, which focuses on developing skill teaching.
References
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskyan Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dunn, W. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and Krashen’s i+1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48(3), 411–42.
Fürstenberg, U., Schumm Fauster, J., Matsunaga, A., & Tsimpoukli, E. (2024). Navigating Tomorrow: Transition Skills for Higher Education [PDF]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/expert/
Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The logical problem of scaffolding in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(19). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0059-x
Jean Tsang, S. (2017). Cognitive discrepancy, dissonance, and selective exposure. Media Psychology, 22(3), 394–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1282873
Kelly, M., Grenfell, M., Allan, R., Kriza, C., & McEvoy, W. (2004). European Profile for Language Teacher Education: A Frame of Reference. Final Report. A Report to the European Commission Directorate General for Education and Culture. Brussels: European Commission – University of Southampton. https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/P1077
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Majid, F. A. (2010). Scaffolding adult learners’ learning through their diversity: An action research. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 235–239.
Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A.-B., Jones, B., Komorowska, H., & Soghikyan, K. (2007). European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. A Reflection Tool for Language Teacher Education. Council of Europe. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847695260-013
Ur, P. (1991). A Course in Language Teaching. Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ur, P., & Wright, A. (1992). Five-Minute Activities. A Resource Book of Short Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UserTesting. (July 17, 2019). The curse of knowledge: How it impacts you, and what to do about it. UserTesting. https://www.usertesting.com/blog/curse-of-knowledge
Van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Harlow: Longman.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: