QUESTIONNAIRE OF SOCIAL PROBABILITY AND POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES – EXAMINATION OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY ON SERBIAN POPULATION

  • Kristina M. Ranđelović University of Nis, Faculty of Philosophy, Psychology department
  • Dušan J. Ranđelovic University of Priština with temporary head-office in Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy
Keywords: Social Anxiety, Questionnaire of social probability and potential consequences, metric characteristics,

Abstract


Prejudice in judgment has an important role in cognitive models of psychopathology. Every selective processing of emotionally relevant stimuli is called cognitive prejudice. One of the cognitive prejudices that is considered a key factor of socially – anxious disorder is prejudice in judgment. It is defined as a disposition to overestimate the probability of occurrence of negative social events in the near future, as well as potential consequences (agitation) that might follow them. The perception of danger is essentially determined by a joined effect of subjective assessment of probability and agitation created by certain events. The researches have shown that socially-anxious individuals have a more expressive prejudice in judgment and that it can be reduced by applying certain psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments, which proves its relevance for the socially-anxious disorder.

Considering the significance of the prejudice in judgment construct for the research and clinical practice and the lack of instruments that is operational in our country, the basic purpose of this paper is to check metric characteristics of the Serbian version of one of the most often mentioned and used questionnairesaimed at the assessment of this construct. It is the Questionnaire of social probability and potential consequences, which has two subscales: 1) to examine the reliability of the questionnaire on the sample of examinees from Serbia; 2) to examine the latent structure of the questionnaire and 3) to examine the construct of validity of the questionnaire by checking the correlations with other relevant constructs (personality traits, anxiety as a trait and fear of negative evaluation).The was adapted for Serbian language from English. The sample consists of 166 examinees, aged from 19 to 29 (AS = 21,73; SD = 1,43). The questionnaire for sensitivity to confirmation assessment was used to estimate personality traits, Anxiety as a trait was estimated by the Scale of anxiety as a trait, which is a part of the anxiety as a trait and condition Inventory, and fear of negative evaluation was estimated by the Scale of fear of negative evaluation – short form. The results show that the instrument for evaluation of prejudice in judgment is highly reliable (α=.96; α=.96), and taht its items can be considered representative (KMO = .93; KMO = .93) and homogeneous (h1 = .47; h1 =.44). In the purpose of the assessment of the latent structure of the questionnaire an explorational factor analysis was conducted (the methods of the main components), and the results suggested that the questionnaire is the kind with two one-dimension subscales (the pecentage of the explained variance is 49.21% i 45.80%). In favor of the construct of validity are the results of correlation analysis, that describe important relations of both components of prejudice in jugdment with personality traits, anxiety and fear of negative evaluation, and they do so in the expected direction. In accordance with all this, the serbian version of the questionnaire can be recomended for measuring prejudice in judgment

 

Author Biographies

Kristina M. Ranđelović, University of Nis, Faculty of Philosophy, Psychology department
Departman za psihologiju
Dušan J. Ranđelovic, University of Priština with temporary head-office in Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy

Katedra za psihologiju.

docent

References

Andrews, G., Freed, S., & Tesson, M. (1994). Proximity and anticipation of a negative outcome in phobias. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 643–645.

Antony, M. M., & Swinson, R. P. (2000). The shyness and social anxiety workbook: Proven techniques for overcoming your fears. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Walshaw, P. D. & Neeren, A. (2006). Cognitive vulnerability to unipolar and bipolar mood disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 726−754.

Amir, N., Beard, C. & Bower, E. (2005). Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(4), 433–443.

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. Oxford, England: International Universities Press.

Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.

Carr, A. T. (1974). Compulsive neurosis: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 81(5), 311–318.

Clark, D. M. (2001). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research and interventions relating to the self and shyness (pp. 405–430). West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons Limited.

Corr, P. J. (2002). Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532.

Collins, K. A., Westra,H. A.,Dozois, D.J. A. & Stewart, S.H. (2005). The validity of the brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19(3), 345–359.

Duke, D., Krishnan, M., Faith, M. & Storch, E. A. (2006). The psychometric properties of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 807–817.

Edelmann, R.J. (1987). The psychology of embarrassment. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.

Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., Perry, K. J. & Herbert, J. D. (1996). Cognitive biases in generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 433–439.

Franklin, M. E., Huppert, J., Langner, R., Leiberg, S., & Foa, E. B. (2005). Interpretation bias: a comparison of treated social phobics, untreated social phobics, and controls. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 289–300.

Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Franklin, M. E., & Foa, E. B. (2000). Anticipated reactions to social events: differences among individuals with generalized social phobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and nonanxious controls. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 731–746.

Gray, J. A. & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Gray, J. A. & McNaughton, N. (2003). The Neuropsychology of Anxiety. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Gomez, A. & Gomez, R. (2002). Personality traits of the behavioural approach and inhibition systems: Associations with processing of emotional stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1299–1316.

Heimberg, R. G., & Becker, R. E. (2002). Cognitive–behavioral group therapy for social phobia: Basic mechanisms and clinical strategies. New York: Guilford Press.

Hofmann, S. G. (2004). Cognitive mediation of treatment change in social phobia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 392–399.

Hofmann, S. G., & Otto, M. W. (2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder. New York: Routledge.

Kimbrel, N. A. (2008). A model of the development and maintenance of generalized social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 592–612.

Kimbrel, N. A., Cobb, A. R., Mitchell, J. T., Hundt, N. E. & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2008). Sensitivity to punishment and low maternal care account for the link between bulimic and social anxiety symptomatology. Eating Behaviors, 9, 210–217.

Kimbrel, N. A. (2009). BIS, BAS, and Bias: The role of personality and cognition in Social Anxiety. Dissertation theses. Greensboro: The Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina.

Kimbrel, N. A. (2012). BIS, BAS and Bias: The role of personality and cognitive bias in social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 395–400.

Kvaal, K., Laake, K. & Engedal, K. (2001). Psychometric properties of the state part of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in geriatric patients. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 980–986.

Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371–376.

Leary, M.R., Kowalski, R.M. (1995). Social Anxiety. New York, Guilford Press.

Lucock, M. P. & Salkovskis, P. M. (1988). Cognitive factors in social anxiety and its treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 297–302.

McManus, F., Clark, D. M. & Hackmann, A. (2000). Specificity of cognitive biases in social phobia and their role in recovery. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28 (3), 201–209.

Mineka, S. & Tomarken, A. J. (1989). The role of cognitive biases in the origins and maintenance of fear and anxiety disorders. In T. Archer & L. G. Nilsson (Eds.), Perspectives in aversively motivated behavior (pp. 195−221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Младеновић, У. и Кнебл, Ј. (1999). Религиозност, аспекти селф-концепта и анксиозност адолесцената. Психологија, 1–2, 83–96.

Moscovitch, A.D, Gavric, D., Merrifield, C., Bielak, T. & Moscovitch, M. (2011). Retrieval properties of negative vs. positive mental images and autobiographical memories in social anxiety: Outcomes with a new measure. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1–13.

Moscovitch, A. D., Gavric, L. D., Senn, M. J., Santesso, L. D., Miskovic, V., Schmidt, A. L., McCabe, E. R. & Antony, M. M. (2012). Changes in Judgment Biases and Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies During Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Distinguishing Treatment Responders from Nonresponders. Cognitive Therapy Research, 36, 261–271.

Noguchi, K., Gohm, C. L. & Dalsky, D. J. (2006). Cognitive tendencies of focusing on positive and negative information. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 891–910.

Poulton, R. G. & Andrews, G. (1996). Change in danger cognitions in agoraphobia and social phobia during treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 413–421.

Rapee, R. M. & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756.

Rodebaugh, T. L., Woods, C. M., Thissen, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Chambless, D. L. & Rapee, R. M. (2004). More information from fewer questions: The factor structure and item properties of the original and brief fear of negative evaluation scale. Psychological Assessment, 16, 169–181.

Rheingold, A. A., Herbert, J. D. & Franklin, M. E. (2003). Cognitive bias in adolescents with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 639–655.

Scott, B. & Melin, L. (1998). Psychometric properties and standardised data for questionnaires measuring negative affect, dispositional style and daily hassles. A nation-wide sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 301–307.

Singh, J. S. (2011). Visual attention and social anxiety: Oculomotor behavior when threatened. Theses, dissertations, and student research: Department of Psychology University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Sesti, A. (2000). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in Medication Clinical Trials. QoL Newsletter, 25, 15–16. Preuzeto 3.02.2013. sa http.//www.mapi-research-inst.com/pdf/art/qol25_8.pdf

Smárı, J., Bjarnadóttir, A. & Bragadóttir, B. (1998). Social anxiety, social skills, and the expectancy/cost of negative social events. Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy, 27, 149–155.

Smári, J., Pétursdóttir, G. & Porsteinsdóttir, (2001). Social anxiety and depression in adolescents in relation to perceived competence and situational appraisal. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 199–207.

Smits, J. A. J., Rosenfield, D., McDonald, R., & Telch, M. J. (2006a). Cognitive mechanisms of social anxiety reduction: an examination of specificity and temporality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1203–1212.

Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Čolović, P. i Nikolašević, Ž. (2014). Validation of the measure of revised reinforcement sensitivity. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(1), 12–21.

Spielberger, C. D., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R. & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the statetrait anxiety inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.

Товиловић, С. (2004). Латентна структура скале социјалне анксиозности и релације између социјалне анксиозности и ирационалних уверења. Психологија, 37(1), 63–88.

Uren, T. H., Szabó , M., & Lovibond, P. F. (2004). Probability and cost estimates for social and physical outcomes in social phobia and panic disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 18, 481–498.

Voncken, M. H., Bögels, S. M., & de Vries, K. (2003). Interpretation and judgmental biases in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1481–1488.

Voncken, M. J., & Bögels, S. M. (2006). Changing interpretation and judgmental bias in social phobia: a pilot study of a short, highly structured cognitive treatment. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 20, 59–73.

Voncken, M. H., Bögels, S. M., & Peeters, F. (2007). Specificity of interpretation and judgemental biases in social phobia versus depression. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 80, 443–453.

Wilson, J. K., & Rapee, R. M. (2005). The interpretation of negative social events in social phobia: changes during treatment and relationship to outcome. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 373–389.

Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Hart, T. A., Turk, C. L. & Schneier, F. R. (2005). Empirical validation and psychometric evaluation of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale in patients with social anxiety disorder. Psychological Assessment, 17, 179–190.

Zou, B. J. & Abbott, J. M. (2012). Self-perception and rumination in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(4), 250–257.

Published
2014/11/25
Section
Original Scientific Paper