Psychoanalytic Reality of Prose

  • Milorad V. Todorović University of Priština with temporary head-office in Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy

Abstract


Scientific methods of a particular field of knowledge can not be freely applied to a different field without any adjustments or reservations. Openness to a different approach is detrimental here. According to Nothrop Frye, psychonalysis in literature tends to “blur the lines between methods”(Frye 1979: 383) thus increasing openness. Therefore, the anxiety that exists between the theory of psychonalysis and the practice of psychoanalytic therapy will follow the application of psychoanalysis to other scientific fields. Solid grasp of the theory of psychoanalysis is incomplete without understanding its practical implementation in the domain of pain as its priviledged source of truth. Even Jacques Lacan emphasized this by distinguishing between understanding and knowing Jacques Derrida’s psychoanalysis.


The interdisciplinary activity, valued today as an important aspect of research, cannot be accomplished by simple confrontations between various specialized branches of knowledge. According to Roland Barthes, interdisciplinary work is not a peaceful operation: it begins effectively when the solidarity of the old disciplines breaks downto the benefit of a new object and a new language, neither of which is in the domain of those branches of knowledge that one calmly sought to confront (Barthes 1986b:181). Mirjana Lončar Vujnović proposes, following Barthes logic, to substitute the term psychoanalysis with the term “experimental mysticism” (Lončar Vujnović 2014: 46). Her proposition has no semantic justification (and not only for its failed attempt at oxymoron) let alone scientific.The exploration of the unconscious psyche which is unknown and irrational – designated under certain circumstances as the exploration of the mystical as a hidden, secret part of a man’s soul – was scrutinized in psychoanalysis by employing a rigorous scientific method in reverence to the methods of the natural sciences. Furthermore, due to the nomothetic-ideographic and discursive nature of psyche, psychoanalysis also included the hermeneutic methodpertinent to the research of various symptoms and sintomas, as well asgenesis and telos.

References

Barthes, R. (1975a): Zadovoljstvo u tekstu. Niš: Gradina.

Barthes, R. (1975b): Roland Barthes. Paris: Seuil

Barthes, R. (1986a): Smrt autora. U (ur. Miroslav Beker): Suvremene književne teorije. Zagreb: SNL

Barthes, R. (1986b): Od djela do teksta. U (ur. Miroslav Beker): Suvremene književne teorije. Zagreb: SNL

Benvenist, E. (1986): Oblik i smisao u govoru. Treći program. III, 70: 179-205

Bowra, M. (1988): Romantičarska imaginacija. Delo, 34, 6-7: 19-35

Evans, D. (2011): Šesnaest pojmova Lakanove psihoanalize. U (Ur. Dejan U. Aničić): Žak Lakan i izazov psihoanalize. Beograd: QT – Queer teorija, 2, 7: 90-127.

Freud, S. (1971a): Tumačenje snova. Novi Sad: Matica srpska

Freud, S. (1971b): Psihopatologija svakodnevnog života. Novi Sad: Matica srpska

Freud, S. (1971c): Dosetka i nejn odnos prema nesvesnom. Novi Sad: Matica srpska

Freud, S. (1992): Psihoanaliza i telepatija. Beograd: Moderna

Freud, S. (1996): Metapsihologija. Beograd: Mond

Frye, N. (1979): Anatomija kritike. Zagreb: Naprijed

Garaudy, R. (1968): O realizmu bez obala. Zagreb: Mladost

Isааcs, S. (1973) The nаture аnd function of phаntаsy. In Klein, M. (ed): Developments in Psycho-Anаlysis. London: Hogаrth Press.

Lacan, J. (1983): Spisi. Beograd: Prosveta

Lapalansche, J. (1980): Helderlin i pitanje oca. Treći program, III, 46: 503-514.

Lešić, Z. (1988): Ideal slobodne stvaralačke ličnosti. U: (Đurčinov,M., Koljević, N., Kovač, M, Kulenović, T., Lešić, Z., Petković, N.): Moderna tumačenja književnosti. Sarajevo: Svjetlost

Lončar-Vujnović, M. (2014): Moderne psihoanalitičke teorije i eksperimentalna proza. Kosovska Mitovica: Zbornik radova filozofskog fakulteta, XLIV(3), 45-65

Mann, T. (1952): Stvaraoci i dela. Novi Sad: Matica srpska

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968): Oko i duh. Beograd: Vuk Karadžić

Paglia, K. (2002): Seksualne personе. Beograd: Zepter Book World.

Starobinski, J. (1990): Kritički odnos. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižnica Zorana Stojanovića

Todorović, M. (2011): Uvod u psihologiju kao nauku i struku. Beograd: Čigoja štampa

Todorović, M. (2012): Psihologija u prostoru umetničkog stvaralaštva. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.

Todorović, M. (2014): “Pravo i pravda: Jedan psihoanalitički pogled“, U: (ur. Jasminka Hasanbegović): Pravo i pravda 2013. Zbornik. Beograd: Pravni fakultet.

Todorović, M. &Jović, V. (2014): Psihologija između psihičke i realne realnosti – koju realnost psihologija istražuje?. Kosovska Mitrovica: Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta, br XLIV (3)/2014, 573-588.

Trilling, L. (1961): Freud and Literature. In: The liberal Imagination. London: Mercury

Zweig, S. (1983): Neimari sveta. Beograd: Rad

Žižek, S. (2008): Ispitivanje realnog. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga

Published
2015/12/08
Section
Научна полемика