Аналогије као могућност испољавања креативности на различитим нивоимаи

Vesna Z. Cvjetinović; Zlatko M. Pavlović

doi:10.5937/zrffp54-49669

Vesna Z. Cvjetinović Univerzitet u Istočnom Sarajevu, Filozofski fakultet, Katedra za pedagogiju, Pale
Zlatko M. Pavlović Univerzitet u Istocnom Sarajevu, Filozofski fakultet, Katedra za pedagogiju, Pale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp54-49669

Ključne reči: креативност, аналогије, 4К модел креативности, аналогије и креативност

Sažetak

У раду су приказане основе 4К модела креативности, као и мјесто и улога коју аналогије имају у менталном функционисању човјека. Потом су представљени примјери примјене аналогија на различитим нивоима испољавања креативности. Циљ нашег теоријског истраживања био је да представимо примјере различитих нивоа креативности који се испољавају и препознају у аналогијама као и да утврдимо значај који има веза између аналогија и креативности. Примјерима су илустроване примјене аналогија на сваком од четири нивоа креативности описаних у 4К моделу (Велико-К, про-к, мало-к и мини-к креативност). Основни резултат до којег смо дошли јесте да аналогије налазе примјену на свим нивоима креативног испољавања. Посебно смо указали на значај везе аналогија са креативношћу на најнижем нивоу (мини-к креативност према 4К моделу). Значај се огледа у томе што је тај ниво креативности основа из које израста креативност на вишим нивоима. Подстицање аналогијског мишљења у контексту развијања мини-к креативности може позитивно дјеловати и на примјену аналогија на осталим, вишим нивоима креативности. Отуд посебну важност има подстицање аналогијског мишљења у предшколском узрасту, узрасту у којем се посебно бурно испољава мини-к креативност.

Reference

Лазаревић, E. и Стевановић, Ј. (2018). Развијеност и разумевање метафоре код деце предшколског узраста. Иновације у настави, 31 (3), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1803049L

Павловић, З. и Каурин, С. (2018). Спонтана примјена аналогија у објашњавању појмова код будућих наставника. Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, 50 (2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1802229P

Павловић, Ј. (2018). Метафоре о знању и како их проучавати у школи. У: И. Ђерић и С. Максић (ур.), Истраживања у школи (стр. 119–134). Београд: Институт за педагошка истраживања. https://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/bitstream/handle/123456789/456/Metafore_o_znanju_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Albert, A., & Kormos, J. (2004). Creativity and narrative task performance: An exploratory study. Language Learning, 54(2), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00256.x

Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G., & Ritchie, S. M. (2006). Metaphor and analogy. In: P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (pp. 1–9). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_1

Ball, Ј. L., Ormerod, T. C., & Morley, N. J. (2004). Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: A comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies, 25(5), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.004

Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247

Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211580

Boden, M. A. (1991). The Creative Mind: Myths & Mechanisms. New York: Basic Books.

Bonnardel, N. (1999). Creativity in design activities: The role of analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 158–165), New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/317561.317589

Casakin, H. (2004). Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process: Expert versus novice performance. Journal of Design Research, 4(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2004.009846

Casakin, H., & Van Timmeren, A. (2014). Analogies as creative inspiration sources in the design studio: The teamwork. Athens Journal of Architecture, 1(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.1-1-4

Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C. D., Cagan, J., Wood, K. L., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(8), Article 081004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004396

Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2

Chiu, I., & Shu, H. (2012). Investigating effects of oppositely related semantic stimuli on design concept creativity. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.603298

Christie, S. (2020). Multiple exemplars of relations. In: J. B. Childers (Ed.), Language and Concept Acquisition from Infancy Through Childhood: Learning from Multiple Exemplars (pp. 221–245). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35594-4_11

Christie, S., Gao, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020). Development of analogical reasoning: A novel perspective from cross-cultural studies. Child Development Perspectives, 14(3), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12380

Cropley, A. (1993). Creativity as an element of giftedness. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(1), 17–30.

Curtis, R. V., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1984). The use of analogies in written text. Instructional Science, 13, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052380

Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320306

Dai, D. Y., Tan, X., Marathe, D., Valtcheva, A., Pruzek, R. M., & Shen, J. (2012). Influences of social and educational environments on creativity during adolescence: Does SES matter? Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677338

Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 17(3), 397–434. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1703_3

Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In: R. J. Sternberg, & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of Insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dunbar, K. N. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In: T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 461–493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychology laboratory. In: D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Egan, K. (1997). The Educated Mind. How Cognitive Tools Shape Our Understanding. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Fein, G. G. (1987). Pretend play: Creativity and consciousness. In: D. Görlitz, & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Curiosity, Imagination, and Play: On the Development of Spontaneous Cognitive Motivational Processes (pp. 281–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In: J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 113–130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.009

Ferreira, L. C. (2008). A psycholinguistic study on metaphor comprehension in a foreign language. Revista Virtual de Estudios da Linguagem – ReVEL, 6(11), 1–23. https://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/52175/1/2008_art_lcferreira.pdf

Finke, R. A. (1995). Creative insight and preinventive forms. In: R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 255–280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Flatow, I. (1993). They All Laughed... From Light Bulbs to Lasers: The Fascinating Stories Behind the Great Inventions That Have Changed Our Lives. New York: Harper Perennial.

Gao, Y., Que, К., Tan, Z., Zhang, Y., & Stella, C. (2022). Analogy use in parental explanation. In: J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2854–2861). University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4w58m1vp

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3

Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R., Wolff, P., Markman, A., & Forbus, K. (1997). Analogy and Creativity in the Works of Johannes Kepler. In: T. Ward, S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Еds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 403–459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/papers/gentner_etAl_2010-KeplerChapter.pdf

Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. (Eds.). (2001). The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Glynn, S. M. (1994). Teaching Science with Analogies, a Strategy for Teachers and Textbook Authors. College Park, MD: National Reading Research Center.

Glynn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: Teaching with analo-gies. In: S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, & M. Brückmann (Eds.), Four Decades of Research in Science Education: From Curriculum Development to Quality Improvement (pp. 113–125). Münster, Germany: Waxmann. http://osu-wams-blogs-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs.dir/548/files/2010/10/Glynn2008MakingScienceConceptsMeaningful.pdf

Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., Semrud-Clikeman, M., & Muth, K. D. (1989). Analogical reasoning and problem solving in science textbooks. In: J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 383–398). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Goldwater, M. B., Gentner, D., LaDue, N. D., & Libarkin, J. C. (2021). Analogy generation in science experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 45(9), Article e13036. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13036

Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048280

Gust, H., Krumnack, U., Kühnberger, K-U., & Schwering, A. (2008). Analogical reasoning: A core of cognition. Künstliche Intelligenz, 1(8), 8–12.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies. Friend or foe? In: P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (pp. 10–24). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_2

Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In: J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 135–145). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Helfand, M., Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). The Four C Model of Creativity: Culture and context. In: V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research (pp. 15–36). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_2

Hoffmann, J., & Russ, S. (2012). Pretend play, creativity, and emotion regulation in children. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026299

Hofstadter, D. R. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. In: D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 499–538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Analogy. In: K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 117–142). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13(3), 295–355. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1303_1

Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book – MIT Press.

Hounshell, D. A. (1984). From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410709336883

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubaure, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003

Jęczeń, U. (2018). Children’s metaphors – an inspiration to change the thinking of cognitive development and logopedic therapy. Logopedia, 47(1), 151–167.

Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z. (2015). Convergent and divergent thinking in verbal analogy. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(4), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1036120

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four С model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033295

Kaurin, S. i Pavlović, Z. (2021). Samoprocjene kreativnosti kod studenata koji pokazuju različitu sklonost ka spontanoj primjeni analogija. DHS, 4 (17), 335–354.

Kettler, T., Lamb, K. N., & Mullet, D. R. (2018). Developing Creativity in the Classroom: Learning and Innovation for 21st-Century Schools. New York: Prufrock Press.

Lauwerys, J. A. (1964). Education. In: M. Douglas, G. Barry, J. Bronowski, J. Fisher, & J. Huxley (Eds.), Man in Society: Patterns of Human Organization (pp. 226–247). London: Aldus Books Limited.

Maksić, S. (1998). Darovito dete u školi. Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja.

Maksić, S. (2015). Darovitost, talenti i kreativnost: od merenja do implicitnih teorija. U: N. Milićević, I. Ristić, V. Nešić i S. Vidanović (ur.), O kreativnosti i umetnosti – savremena psihološka istraživanja (Tematski zbornik radova) (str. 11–27). Niš: Izdavački centar Filozofskog fakulteta u Nišu.

Naderi, H., Abdullah, R., Aizan, H. T., Sharir, J., & Kumar, V. (2009). Creativity, age and gender as predictors of academic achievement among undergraduate students. Journal of American Science, 5(5), 101–112.

Parker, L. (2016, avgust). Do poslednje kapi. National Geographic (izdanje za Srbiju), str. 91–111.

Pečjak, V. (1989). Putevi do ideja. Ljubljana: Sopstveno izdanje.

Perkins, D. N. (1994). Creativity: Beyond the Darwinian paradigm. In: M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of Creativity (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=d208ffb55b75f62594b2933541121c3a947d57dc

Perkins, D. N. (1997). Creativity’s camel: The role of analogy in invention. In: T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 523–538). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10227-019

Puccio, G. J. (2017). From the dawn of humanity to the 21st century: Creativity as an enduring survival skill. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.203

Pušina, A. (2020). Navođenje na kreativnost: psihologijski fundamenti. Sarajevo: Filozofski fakultet.

Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality, 10, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_2

Ritchie, S. M., Bellocchi, A., Poltl, H., & Wearmouth, M. (2006). Metaphors and analogies in transition: Beginning teachersʼ lived experience. In: P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (pp. 143–153). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students’ achievement? Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01266.x

Singh, M., & Singh, A. (2021). Analogy and metaphor: Pedagogical approaches to creative writing. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(10), 76–79. https://www.questjournals.org/jrhss/papers/vol9-issue10/Ser-2/L09107679.pdf

Suzić, N. (2000). Dvadeset osam kompetencija za XXI vijek. Banja Luka: Republički pedagoški zavod.

Tesla, N. (2018). Moji izumi. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.

Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1991). Using analogies in secondary chemistry teaching. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 37(2), 10–14.

Thomas, G. P. (2006). Metaphor, student’s conceptions of learning and teaching, and metacognition. In: P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (pp. 105–117). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-3460-0236d417e8.pdf

Ugur, G., Dilber, R., Senpolat, Y., & Duzgun, B. (2012). The еffects of аnalogy on students’ understanding of direct current circuits and attitudes towards physics lessons. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 211–223. https://pdf.eu-jer.com/EU-JER_1_3_211_Ugur_Etal.pdf

Vendetti, M. S., Matlen, B. J., Richland, L. E., & Bunge, S. A. (2015). Analogical reasoning in the classroom: Insights from cognitive science. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12080

Vendetti, M. S., Wu, A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2014). Far-out thinking: Generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. Psychological Science, 25, 982–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518079

Venville, G. J., Gribble, S. J., & Donovan, J. (2006). Metaphors for gens. In: P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (pp. 79–91). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_7

Wilbers, J., & Duit, R. (2006). Post-festum and heuristic analogies. In: P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (pp. 37–49). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Winner, E., McCarthy, M., & Gardner, H. (1980). The ontogenesis of metaphor. In: R. P. Honeck, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cognition and Figurative Language (pp. 341–361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429432866

Wong, E. D. (1993). Self-generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300405