ON THE DEFLATIORY NATURE OF BITCOIN
Abstract
Unique assemblage of technical solutions and economic concepts called Bitcoin was presented at the end of 2008. For a long time, this paying system was not in the focus of economic or legal research, but nowadays it is almost impossible to conduct and complete research on monetary obligations without short review at least on how this system operates. Being so, it may come as a surprise that, even with all the research conducted recently, we still do not have definite answers to some of the most fundamental questions. One of them is whether Bitcoin is form of money or something entirely different.
We believe that Bitcoin was designed primarily, not with the intention to create money in a strict sense, but with the intention to provide platform for transfer of value form one party to another in as little time as possible, with no intermediaries, at low(er) price, all that without compromising safety of the participants or assets. In other words, the idea was to make transfer of value as effective as possible. Yet, Bitcoin has a capacity to take on the role of the money in a most strict sense. That capacity was even recognized in court cases and comes to the fore mainly in times of crisis. And with respect to that capacity, in this paper we present results of the primarily empirical, but also theoretical research conducted previously on bitcoins volatile, but still very deflationary nature and its effect on monetary obligations.
Concretely, we believe that, with the analogy to foreign currency clauses, cryptocurrencies, primarily bitcoin, can also be used as hedging instrument to prevent negative effects of domestic currency depreciation. The idea might be controversial for number of reasons. Certainly, one of them is related to very volatile nature of bitcoin “price”. Yet, in that context, we stressed that periodic depreciation of its value does not mean that bitcoin is inflationary. On the contrary, bitcoin is deflationary by nature. Different built in mechanisms, but also new ways of application emphasize that nature.
So, in this paper we use different techniques of analytical method, first to single out various deflatory mechanisms, both preprogramed and factual ones, and after that to describe them. We also use synthetical method and its techniques, primarily abstraction and generalization, to sum up data which confirms our main hypothesis that the bitcoin is by nature deflatory despite its volatility, therefore it can be used as hedging mechanism in form of cryptocurrency clauses.
References
Abramowicz, M. B. (2015). Peer-to-Peer Law, Built on Bitcoin. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper 2015-9, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper. No. 2015-9, Retrieved 02 March 2023, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2573788 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2573788
Antonopoulos, M. A. (2014). Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc
Baur, D. G., Dimpfl, T. (2021). The volatility of Bitcoin and its role as a medium of exchange and a store of value. Empirical Economics. 61 (5). 2663–2683.
Cachanosky, N. (2019). Can Bitcoin become money? The monetary rule problem. Australian Economic Papers. 58 (4). 365–374.
Caetano, R. (2015). Learning Bitcoin. Birmingham: Packt Publishing
Calcaterra, C., Kaal, W. A., Rao, V. (2020). Stable Cryptocurrencies. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy. 61, 193-227
Catanzaro, Z. L., Kain, R. (2020). The Revolution Will Be Memorialized: Selected Blockchain-Based Smart Contract Use Cases. Florida Bar Journal. 94 (5). 52–56
Cavalheiro, G. M. do C., Cavalheiro, M. B. (2022). Assessing technological trends through patent landscaping: The case of Bitcoin. Journal of World Intellectual Property. 25 (1). 206–219
Cvetković, M. (2018). Novčane obaveze i kriptovalute. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 57 (81). 119-138
Цветковић, П. (2020). Блокчејн као правни феномен – уводна разматрања. Зборник радова Правног факултета у Нишу. 59 (87). 127-144
Dimitrijević, M. (2018). Elektronski novac u savremenom monetarnom pravu. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 57 (81). 221-236
Dinić, V. (2014). Bitkojn kao decentralizovana valuta. Bankarstvo. 43 (2). 108-137
Đorđević, A. (2018). The Application of Advanced Technologies in the Field of International Finances: Bitcoin Phenomenon. Ekonomika. 64 (1). 95-104
Garratt, R., Wallace, N. (2018). Bitcoin 1, Bitcoin 2, ....: An Experiment in Privately Issued outside Monies. Economic Inquiry. 56(3). 1887-1897
Hayek, F. A. (1976). Denationalization of Money (An Analysis of the Theory and Practice of Concurrent Currencies). London: The Institute of Economic Affairs. Retrieved 10 March 2021, from https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Denationalisation%20of%20Money.pdf
Horvatić, H., Tafra, V. (2022). Identifikacija komercijalne blockchain tehnologije te izazovi i opasnosti primjene kroz konkretne primjere. Obrazovanje za poduzetništvo - E4E. 12 (2), 105-120
Hutchinson, M., Dowd, K. (2015). Bitcoin Will Bite the Dust. CATO Journal. 35 (2). 357–38. 1 Retrieved March1 2022, from https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2015/5/cj-v35n2-12.pdf
Jović, Ž., Nikolić, I. (2022). The Darker Side of Fintech: the Emergence of New Risks. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business. 25 (SCI). 46-63
Karabulut, T. Sari, S.S. (2022). The attitude of academic staff towards Bitcoin. Ekonomski vjesnik. 35 (1), 55-67
Karame, G., Androulaki, E. (2016). Bitcoin and Blockchain Security. Boston, London: Artech House
Magnuson, J. W. (2022). The Failure of Market Efficiency. Brigham Young University Law Revew. 48 (3). 827-908 Retrieved 21 April 2023, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4096270
McGinnis, J. O. (2020). Bitcoin’s Nature and Its Future. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 43 (1). 59–66. Retrieved 11 February 2022, from https://ezproxy.nb.rs:2076/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=141404064&site=eds-live
Mijatović, N. (2022). Pravna (ne)uređenost kriptovaluta i njihov utjecaj na industriju osiguranja. Hrvatski časopis za OSIGURANJE. (6). 93-106
Mirjanich, N. (2014). Digital Money: Bitcoin’s Financial and Tax Future despite Regulatory Uncertainty. DePaul Law Review. 64 (1). 213–248
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Pear-to-Pear Electronic Cash System. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 29 January 2021, from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Pernice, C. (2021). Bitcoin: Civil Law Topics and Issues. Italian Law Journal. 7 (2). 769–802
Radulović, S. (2021). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency clauses. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 60 (93). 29-44
Raskin, M. I. (2015). Realm of the Coin: Bitcoin and Civil Procedure. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law. 20 (4). 969–1011
Roth, N. (2015). An Architectural Assessment of Bitcoin: Using the Systems Modeling Language. Procedia Computer Science. 44. 527-536.
Syropyatov. V. A. (2021). Stablecoins as an implementation of Hayek’s private money theory. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. (2). 318–331. Retrieved 10 March 2023, from https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.15.2021.2.318-331
Šoja, T., Senarathne, C. W. (2019). Bitcoin i diversifikacija portfolija - perspektiva globalnog investitora. Bankarstvo. 48 (4), 44-63
Teomete Yalabık, F., Yalabık, İ. (2019). Anonymous Bitcoin v enforcement law. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. 33(1), 34–52 Retrieved 13 January 2023, from https://ezproxy.nb.rs:2076/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=134805585&site=eds-live
Turudić, D.A., Milić, J., Štulina, K. (2017) Korištenje kriptovaluta u međunarodnom poslovanju. Zbornik sveučilišta Libertas. 1-2 (1-2). 191-210
Vareško, A., Deković, D. (2022). Utjecaj pandemije COVID 19 na povezanost kretanja cijena bitcoina i vodećih svjetskih burzovnih indeksa. Zbornik radova Međimurskog veleučilišta u Čakovcu. 13 (2). 89-99
Zebec, S. (2018). Pravna regulacija bitcoina i ostalih virtualnih valuta u nekim neeuropskim zemljama i hrvatskom zakonodavstvu. Zbornik radova Međimurskog veleučilišta u Čakovcu. 9 (1). 87-91