IZAZOVI U OSTVARIVANJU PRAVA NA GODIŠNJI ODMOR RADNIKA NA DUGOTRAJNOM BOLOVANJU U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ
Abstract
The right to paid annual leave is one of the fundamental rights in the employment relationship and as such is incorporated in a number of legal acts, both at the international and regional, aswell as national level. The purpose of this right is to enable the worker to rest from physicaland/or mental work, to enable him to enjoy relaxation and leisure, in order to restore his working abilities. The right to paid annual leave, in accordance with the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union, is considered a particularly important principle of Community social law, which is why it must be recognized for every worker, regardless of their health status. However, in the Republic of Croatia, the realization of the right to paid annual leave for workers who were on long-term sick leave, was followed with significant difficulties after returning to work. The current Croatian Labor Law, in the context of the institution of transferring annual leave to the next calendar year, provisions of Article 84 states that a worker who, due to illness, does not use annual leave in full or in part in the calendar year in which it was earned, has the right to use it upon returning to work, and no later than June 30 of the following calendar year. The question arises, how will a worker who has spent two, three or more years on long-term sick leave fit into the aforementioned provision? Will this legal solution deprive him of the right to paid annual leave?
The aim of the paper is to analyze the relevant provisions of Croatian positive law regarding the right to paid annual leave and the possibility to transferring it, to correlate them with the relevant European directives and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and to conclude on their compliance and impact on the position of workers and employers in the Republic of Croatia.
References
De Bloom, J., Geurts S.A.E., Taris T.W., Sonnentag S., De Weerth C., Kompier M.A.J. (2010). Effects of vacation from work on health and well-being: Lots of fun, quickly gone. Work & Stress. 24, 2. 196-216.
De Bloom, J., Geurts S.A.E., Kompier M.A.J. (2012).
Vacation (after-)effects on employee health and well-being, and the role of vacation activities, experiences and sleep. Journal of Happiness Studies.14, 2. 613-633. EURES/EURopean Employment Services (2022).
Why you should always use your annual leave, 2022, https://eures.europa.eu/why-you-should-alwaysuse- your-annual-leave-2022-09-16_en (15 July 2024) Europski parlament (2024). Kratki vodič o Europskoj uniji – 2024, Retrieved 30 January 2024 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/erpl-app-public/ factsheets/pdf/hr/FTU_1.3.10.pdf
Frntić, D.F.,Gović Penić, I., Hanzalek, D., Milković, D., Novaković, N., Rožman, K., Zovko,V. (2023). Detaljni komentar Zakona o radu. Zagreb, Rosip, d.o.o.
Gović Penić, I. (2024). Vremensko ograničavanje korištenja prenesenog godišnjeg odmora u domaćoj sudskoj praksi i praksi Suda EU. Informator. 6830.11-15
Gump, B.B., Matthews, K.A. (2000). Are vacations good for your health? The 9-year mortality experience after the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Psychosomatic Medicine. 62. 608–612
Ministarstvo rada, mirovinskoga sustava, obitelji i socijalne politike (2023). Prenošenje godišnjeg odmora u slijedeću kalendarsku godinu - bolest, 4.1.2023, https://uznr.mrms.hr/prenosenje-godisnjeg-odmora-u-slijedecu-kalendarsku- godinu-bolest/ (accessed on 15 June 2024)
Potočnjak, Ž.,Grgić, A., Čatipović, I. (2014). The right to paid annual leave: the implication of accession. Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy. 10 (1). 159-187
Subotić, V. (2021). Pravo na godišnji odmor prema međunarodnim izvorima. Radno pravo. 6. 3-11
Turkalj,K., Turkalj, A. (2022). Kriteriji za razgraničenje radnog vremena od vremena odmora u praksi Suda EU-A. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci. 43 (1). 83-102
Legal acts
Konvencija 132 - Konvencija o plaćenom godišnjem odmoru (revidirana). Narodne novine. Br. 3 (2002) Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities.C 364/01 (2000)
Direktiva 2003/88/ EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 4. studenoga 2003. o određenim vidovima organizacije radnog vremena. Službeni list. Br. 299 (2003) Ustav Republike Hrvatske. Narodne novine. Br. 56 (1990), 135(1997), 08 (1998), 113 (2000), 124 (2000), 28 (2001), 41 (2001), 55 (2001), 76 (2010), 85 (2010), 05 (2014)
Zakon o radu. Narodne novine. Br. 93 (2014), 127 (2017), 98 (2019), 151 (2022), 46 (2023), 64 (2023)
Case law
Case C-350/06 Gerhard Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:18
Case C-520/06 Stringer and Others v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:18
Case C- 214/10 KHS AG v Winifried Schulte [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:761
Case C-337/10 Georg Neidel v Stadt Frankfurt am Main [ 2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:263
Case C-214/16 Conley King v The Sash Window Workshop Ltd and Richard Dollar [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:914
Case C-684/16 Max‑Planck‑Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:874
Case C-762/18 QH protiv Vrhoven kasacionen sad na Republika Bulgaria [2020] ECLI:EU:C:2020:504
Case C-37/19 CV protiv Iccrea Banca SpA Istituto Centrale del Credito Cooperativo [2020] ECLI:EU:C:2020:504
Case C-271/22 do C-275/22 XT (C-271/22), KH (C-272/22), BX (C-273/22), FH (C-274/22), NW (275/22) v Keolis Agen SARL [2023] ECLI:EU:C:2023:834
Case C-271/22 do C-275/22 XT (C-271/22), KH (C-272/22), BX (C-273/22), FH (C-274/22), NW (275/22) v Keolis Agen SARL [2023],
Mišljenje nezavisne odvjetnice Tamare Ćapeta, ECLI:EU:C:2023:243 Općinski sud u Čakovcu, Odluka br.7:Pr- 598/21/Decision of the Municipal Court in Čakovec of 9.7.2021 Županijski sud u Zagrebu, Odluka br. 37. Gž R- 2131/2021/Decision of the County Court in Zagreb of 6.12.2022