THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES: A FUTURE FOR A MORE PROFOUND MULTILATERALISM IN TAX MATTERS?

  • Lidija Živkovic Asistent Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu
Keywords: Conference of the Parties. – Multilateral instrument (MLI). – Double Taxation Treaties. – Tax Sovereignty. – Tax Cooperation.

Abstract


The present contribution is aimed at assessing the potential practical reach of the Conference of the Parties, a mechanism provided for under art. 31 of the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, which was signed on 7 June 2017 in Paris and to which currently 94 taxing jurisdictions are signatories. Since the scope of application of the Conference of the Parties is conditioned on the legal nature and modus operandi of the said Convention, the first part of the article will be dedicated to their analysis. Furthermore, the author will consider in detail the provisions of the Convention intended to establish the procedural framework for the operation of the Conference of the Parties. The analysis will then be focused on some of the essential questions which the Convention failed to regulate: the decision-making process applicable by the Conference of the Parties and the legal effect of its future decisions, by having recourse to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

Although it remains questionable if the Conference of the Parties could have a role as important as it does in other fields of public international law, considering the countries’ traditionally vigilant approach to the limitations of their fiscal sovereignty, the author contends that this mechanism could potentially serve as a basis for a more thorough cooperation between taxing jurisdictions worldwide, especially now that the world is struggling with yet another economic crisis. What seems to be necessary in this respect is the shift of international tax policy design from a handful of richest countries to a more inclusive circle of jurisdictions, for which the Conference of the Parties could provide a framework.

References

Bradley, Ian, Jonathan Bright: “State sovereignty and the multilateral instrument”, Canadian Tax Journal, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2016.
CFE Fiscal Committee: “Opinion Statement FC 15/2014 on Developing a Multilateral Instrument to Modify Bilateral Tax Treaties (BEPS Action 15)”, European Taxation, April 2015.
Christians, Allison: “Sovereignty, Taxation and Social Contract”, Minnesota Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, 2009.
Dörr, Oliver: “Article 31. General rule of interpretation”, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (eds. Oliver Dörr, Kirsten Schmalenbach), Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2012.
European Parliament: Understanding BEPS: From tax avoidance to digital tax challenges, EPRS Briefing, October 2019.
Govind, Sriram, Pasquale Pistone: “The Relationship Between Tax Treaties and the Multilateral Instrument: Compatibility Clauses in the Multilateral Instrument”, The OECD Multilateral Instrument for Tax Treaties (eds. Michael Lang et al.), Wolters Kluwer, Alpen aan den Rijn 2018.
Graetz, Michael J.: “Taxing International Income: Inadequate Principles, Outdated Concepts, and Unsatisfactory Policies”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, Issue 4, 2001.
Haslehner, Werner: “A Multilateral Interpretation of the Multilateral Instrument (and Covered Tax Agreements)?”, Bulletin for International Taxation, Journal Articles & Papers, IBFD Research Database, Vol. 74, Issue 4/5, 2020.
Hoffmeister, Frank: “Article 9. Adoption of the Text”, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (eds. Oliver Dörr, Kirsten Schmalenbach), Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2012.
Holzinger, Raphael: “The Relevance of the Conference of the Parties for the Interpretation and Amendment of the Multilateral Instrument”, The OECD Multilateral Instrument for Tax Treaties: Analysis and Effects, Wolters Kluwer, New York 2018.
Lang, Michael: “Die Auslegung des multilateralen Instruments”, Steuer und Wirtschaft International, Vol. 27, Issue 1, 2017.
Lo, Chang-fa: Treaty Interpretation Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Springer, Singapore 2017.
Lombardo, Marina: “The Mutual Agreement Procedure (Art. 25 OECD MC) – A tool to overcome interpretation problems?”, Fundamental Issues and Practical Problems in Tax Treaty Interpretation (eds. M. Schilcher, P. Weninger), Linde, Vienna 2008.
Matz-Lück, Nele: “Treaties, Conflict Clauses”, Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (ed. Rüdiger Wolfrum), Oxford University Press 2012. https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1466#:~:text=1%20Conflict%20clauses%2C%20also%20known,between%20provisions%20stemming%20from%20different, 9 October 2020.
McLachlan, Campbell: “The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2005.
Miladinovic, Alexandra, Alexander Rust: “Options Under the Multilateral Instrument”, The OECD Multilateral Instrument for Tax Treaties, Wolters Kluwer, Alpen aan den Rijn 2018.
Odendahl, Kerstin: “Amendment of multilateral treaties”, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (eds. Oliver Dörr, Kirsten Schmalenbach), Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2012.
Odendahl, Kerstin: “Article 30: Application of successive treaties relating to the same subject matter”, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (eds. Oliver Dörr, Kirsten Schmalenbach), Springer 2012.
OECD, Rules of Procedure of the Co-ordinating Body of the Conventiton on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, June 2015, available at: https://www.oecd.org/ctp/exchange-of-tax-information/co-ordinating-body-rules-of-procedure.pdf, 31 October 2020.
OECD, Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital, OECD Publishing, Paris 2017.
OECD, Explanatory Statement to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, OECD Publishing, Paris 2017.
OECD, Signatories and Parties to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, Status as of 29 September 2020, http://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/beps-mli-signatories-and-parties.pdf, 8 October 2020.
OECD/Council of Europe: The Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters: Amended by the 2010 Protocol, OECD Publishing, Paris 2011.
OECD/G20, Developing a Multilateral Instrument to Modify Bilateral Tax Treaties, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, Action 15: 2015 Final Report, OECD Publishing, Paris 2015.
Pascual-Vives, Francisco: “The Notion of Consensus in Public International Law”, Consensus-Based Interpretation of Regional Human Rights Treaties, Leiden 2019.
Ring, Diane: “What’s at Stake in the Sovereignty Debate?: International Tax and the Nation-State”, Boston College Law School, Research Paper 153, 2008.
Röben, Volker: “Conference (Meeting) of States Parties” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, 2015.
United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries, United Nations, New York 2017.
Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Jakob Pichon: “Consensus”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (ed. Rüdiger Wolfrum), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.
Published
2021/02/25
Section
Original Scientific Paper