MINIMUM AND FIXED RESALE PRICES IN VERTICAL AGREEMENTS IN COMPETITION LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Abstract
Resale price maintenance represents a special type of vertical restraint in a vertical agreement, in which an upstream undertaking defines, controls or restricts the price at which a downstream undertaking can resell its product. According to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/720 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices the exemption shall not apply to vertical agreements which, directly or indirectly, in isolation or in combination with other factors under the control of the parties, have as their object the restriction of the buyer’s ability to determine its sale price, without prejudice to the possibility of the supplier to impose a maximum sale price or recommend a sale price, provided that they do not amount to a fixed or minimum sale price as a result of pressure from, or incentives offered by, any of the parties. Minimum or fixed resale price maintenance represents a hardcore restriction and as such removes the benefit of the block exemption provided for in Art. 2 of the Regulation 2022/720.
The paper deals with the legal regulation of restrictive vertical agreements in which a fixed or minimum resale price is determined in the competition law of the European Union, as well as the methods for such resale price maintenance. The problem will be considered through the analysis of relevant sources of law, practice of the European Commission and the Court of Justice of the European Union and doctrinal views.
References
1. Alison Jones, Brenda Sufrin, Niamh Dunne, Jones & Sufrin’s EU Competition Law – Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford 2019.
2. Valentine Korah, An Introductory Guide to EC Competition Law and Practice, Portland, Oregon 2004.
3. Vlatka Butorac Malnar, Jasminka Pecotić Kaufman, Siniša Petrović, Dubravka Akšamović, Marijana Liszt, Pravo tržišnog natjecanja i državnih potpora, Zagreb 2021.
4. Volker Emmerich, Kartellrecht, München 2008.
5. George P. Kyprianides, „Should resale price maintenance be per se illegal?“, European Competition Law Review, 2012, 33(8), 376-385.
6. Драган Лончар, Филип Стојановић, Љубица Пјевовић, „Упоредна економско-правна анализа вертикалних рестриктивних споразума са фокусом на одређивање цена у даљој продаји“, Ревија Копаоничке школе природног права, 1/2023, 27-44.
7. Ernst-Joachim Mestmäcker, Heike Schweitzer, Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht, 3. Auflage, München 2014.
8. Luc Peeperkorn, „Resale price maintenance and its alleged efficiencies“, European Competition Journal, June 2008, Vol. 4 No. 1, 201-212.
9. Manuela Lupeanu, „Price Restrictions in Vertical Agreements: Benefits or Shortages And Possibility of Exemption“, Romanian Competition Journal, 1/2022, 72-79.
10. Moritz Lorenz, An Introduction to EU Competition Law, Cambridge 2013.
11. Nikolaos E. Zevgolis, „Resale price maintenance (RPM) in European competition law: legal certainty versus economic theory?”, European Competition Law Review, 2013, 34(1), 25-32.
12. OECD, Roundtable on Resale Price Maintenance, DAF/COMP(2008)37, 2009.
13. Rаiner Bechtold, Wolfgang Bosch, Ingo Brinker, EU – Kartellrecht – Kommentar, München 2014.
14. Richard Whish, David Bailey, Competition Law, 9th edition, Oxford 2018.
15. Сандра Фишер Шобот, „Појам вертикалног споразума и вертикалног ограничења у Уредби 2022/720 о групном изузећу вертикалних споразума“, Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду, 1/2023, 189-208.
16. Frank Wijckmans, Filip Tuytschaever, Moritz Lorenz, Andreas Zellhofer, Vertriebsveträge im Kartellrecht – Deutsche, österreichische und unionweite Rechtspraxis vertikaler Vereinbarungen, Wien 2019.
17. Frank Wijckmans, Filip Tuytschaever, Vertical Agreements in EU Competition Law, 2nd edition, Oxford 2011.
18. Helmuth Schröter, Thinam Jakob, Robert Klotz, Wolfgang Mederer (Hrsg.), Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht – Grosskommentar, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden 2014.
ИЗВОРИ ПРАВА
1. Смернице о вертикалним ограничењима (Guidelines on Vertical Restraints), OJ C 248/01, 30.6.2022. године.
2. Уговор о функционисању Европске уније (Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), OJ C 202/47, 7.6.2016. године.
3. Уредба Комисије (ЕУ) 2022/720 од 10. маја 2022. о примену члана 101(3) Уговора о функционисању Европске уније на категорије вертикалних споразума и усаглашених пракси (Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/720 of 10 May 2022 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices), OJ L 134, 11.5.2022. године.
ПРАКСА ЕВРОПСКЕ КОМИСИЈЕ
1. AT.40182 – Pioneer, 24.07.2018.
2. AT.40428 – GUESS, 17.12.2018.
3. AT.40465 – Asus, 24.7.2018.
4. AT.40469 – Denon & Marantz, 24.7.2018.
5. COMP/37.975 PO – Yamaha, 16.7.2003.
6. COMP/36.264 - Mercedes-Benz, OJ L 257, 25.9.2002.
7. COMP/F-2/36.693 — Volkswagen, OJL 262/14, 2.10.2001.
СУДСКА ПРАКСА
1. C 211/22 Super Bock Bebidas SA, AN, BQ v Autoridade da Concorrência, ECLI:EU:C:2023:529.
2. C 306/20 SIA „Visma Enterprise” v Konkurences padome, ECLI:EU:C:2021:935.
3. C 450/19 Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto, ECLI:EU:C:2021:10.
4. C 260/07 Pedro IV Servicios Sl v Total Espana SA, ECLI:EU:C:2009:215.
5. C 2/01P Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Importeure eV and Commission of the European Communities v Bayer AG, ECLI:EU:C:2004:2.
6. 107/82, AEG-Telefunken AG v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:1983:293.