Multidisciplinary Approach to the Prevention, Detection, Investigation and Prosecution of Environmental Crime as a Standard of Directive 2024/1203

  • Veljko Turanjanin Faculty of Law, University of Kragujevac
Keywords: Directive (EU) 2024/1203, environmental crime, multidisciplinary approach, criminal law, environmental protection, investigation and prosecution, European Union

Abstract


By adopting Directive (EU) 2024/1203 on the protection of the environment through criminal law, the European Union has established a new, unified and comprehensive standard in the field of environmental criminal law. This legal instrument, adopted on 11 April 2024 and entering into force on 20 May of the same year, replaces the earlier Directives 2008/99/EC and 2009/123/EC, significantly expands the catalogue of criminal offences, strengthens sanctions, and introduces innovative mechanisms of implementation. One of its key novelties is the requirement for a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and prosecution of environmental crime. The Directive is grounded in the recognition that environmental crime is inherently complex, often cross-border and transnational in nature. Unlawful emissions of hazardous substances into air, water and soil, trafficking in endangered species, illegal waste management, unlawful logging, and improper handling of dangerous substances all inflict severe damage on ecosystems and human health while generating high illegal profits. For this reason, alongside legal and criminal procedural instruments, the integration of knowledge and resources from multiple disciplines—law, criminology, ecology, chemistry, biology, toxicology, economics and information technologies—is indispensable.

The Directive explicitly emphasises the obligation of Member States to ensure adequate professional staff and financial, technical and technological resources for combating environmental crime. This includes not only increasing the capacity of the police, prosecution services and courts, but also their specialisation and continuous training. In this context, multidisciplinary teams—bringing together legal experts, forensic specialists, environmental inspectors, information system experts and scientists from the natural and technical sciences—become a necessary condition for effective detection and proof of environmental offences.

Furthermore, the Directive highlights the importance of coordination and cooperation not only within a single Member State (between various institutions) but also at the level of the European Union. It underscores the roles of Eurojust, Europol, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) in providing technical and operational support. Such an approach presupposes that combating environmental crime cannot rely solely on criminal prosecution, but requires the integration of preventive measures, administrative sanctions, civil liability and criminal law instruments into a coherent system. The multidisciplinary approach also includes the participation of the public and non-governmental organisations, which the Directive recognises as part of the standard of access to justice and transparency. Article 15 ensures procedural rights for individuals and associations protecting the environment, thereby creating space for citizens and civil society to contribute to the protection of the public interest.

The Directive thus confirms that contemporary environmental crime cannot be effectively addressed without the integration of knowledge and cooperation among diverse disciplines and actors. The multidisciplinary standard it explicitly endorses represents a core element of the European criminal law system for environmental protection and a model that will, in the process of harmonisation, strongly influence candidate countries for EU membership.

 

References

Бановић, Б., Бејатовић, С., Турањанин, В. (2020). Међународно кривично право. Крагујевац: Правни факултет Универзитета у Крагујевцу.
De Hert, P., Papakonstantinou, V. (2019). Data Protection and the EPPO. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 10(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419837381
Höhn, C. (2023). Strengthening cooperation with external partners: Looking for a common response to the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 14(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231170336
Ligeti, K., Marletta, A. (2016). EU Criminal Justice Actors: Accountability and Judicial Review Vis-À-Vis the EU Citizen. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 7(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441600700207
Schinina, M. (2020). What balance between Eurojust and Europol from a parliamentary angle?. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 11(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420901784
Strategic Seminar: “Eurojust and the Lisbon Treaty: Towards More Effective Action” Bruges, 20–22 September 2010 Report. (2011). New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441100200108
Tas, S. (2023). The dangerous increasing support of Europol in national criminal investigations: An additional layer of complexity. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 14(4), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231214482
Vanbeselaere, L. (2025). Youth justice or criminal law? The scope of ‘judicial cooperation in criminal matters’. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844251384130
Weyembergh, A., Theodorakakou, G. (2023). The role of Europol and Eurojust in countering the threat of FTFs: An evolving mandate. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 14(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231166359
Weyembergh, A., Armada, I., Brière, C. (2015). Competition or Cooperation?. State of Play and Future Perspectives on the Relations between Europol, Eurojust and the European Judicial Network. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 6(2), 258–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441500600207
Weyembergh, A. (2011). The Development of Eurojust: Potential and Limitations of Article 85 of the TFEU. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441100200107
Weyembergh, A., Brière, C. (2017). The future cooperation between OLAF and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 9(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284417743820

Правни извори
European Union: Council of the European Union, Directive (EU) 2024/1203 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 on the protection of the environment through criminal law and replacing Directives 2008/99/EC and 2009/123/EC, PE/82/2023/REV/1 OJ L, 2024/1203, 30 April 2024.
European Union: Council of the European Union, Council Decision of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol), OJ L 121, 15 May 2009.
Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2008/C 115/01, European Union (EU), 13 December 2007.
European Union: European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA, OJ L 135, 24 May 2016.
European Union: Council of the European Union, Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’), OJ L 283, 31 October 2017.
European Union: European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law, OJ L 198, 28 July 2017.
European Union: European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999, OJ L 248, 18 September 2013.
Published
2026/07/03
Section
Originalni naučni rad