Legal dilemmas of maternal brain death during pregnancy - The Case of Marlise Munjoz
Abstract
The subject of this article is a case that occurred in Texas in 2013 which has caused great debate between medical and legal profession and has stirred public concern. Marlisa Munoz, 14 weeks pregnant, suffered a massive pulmonary embolism resulted in a brain death. Marlisa's will had been that in the case of irreversible brain damage, doctors didn’t somatically support her. Despite Marlisa's will, announced by her husband Eric, and confirmed by her parents, doctors decided to keep her artificially maintained until delivery, or while the fetus is vital. The reason for this decision has been found in the Texas Advance Directives Act (TADA). The main problem with this regulation and interpretation thus set is collision between the rights of the individual who has made decision about their physical integrity and the right of the fetus to continue to develop. In this case, no account was taken of the brain anomalies and damages that fetus would have develop growing from week 14 inside brain death mother artificially maintained. The aim of this research is to analyze advance directives, whether the regulations derogate living will when the patient is pregnant woman, (un) justification for derogation, with special reference to the controversial TADA. In concluding considerations, I will analyze which legal and ethical dilemmas arise in these cases
References
2. Gostin, L. (2014). Legal and Ethical Responsibilities Following Brain Death: The mcmath and Muñoz Cases. Dostupno na: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1311/
3. Jecker, N. (1992). Medical Futility. Who decides? Dostupno na: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/21557071_Medical_Futility_Who_Decides
4. Jonsen, A. (1978). Dying Right in California — The Natural Death Act, Clinical Toxicology. Dostupno na: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/15563657808988256
5. Longmire-Jefferis, V. (2014). Termination of Pregnancy Pre-Viability and the Dilemma of Maternal Artificial Life Support: An Examination of Texas State Law and Advance Directives. Health law Perspectives. Houston: Universiy of Houston.
6. Macaluso, G. (2014- 2015). Life, Death, and Somewhere In Between. Lexia vol III. Harrisonburg, Virginia: James Madison University.
7. Mayo, T. (2009). The Baby Doe Rules and ”Texas’s Futility Law“ in NICU. Dostupno na: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?Article=2388&context=gsulr
8. Parks, B. (2020). Eight and Fourteenth Amendment Concerns with the bop Guidelines for Advance Directives. Dostupno na: http://www.voicesinbioethics.net/voices-in-bioethics/2020/2/13/eighth-and-fourteenth-amendment-concerns-with-the-bop-guidelines-for-advance-directives
9. Radolović, A. (2019). „Biološka oporuka“ u pravu osobnosti i medicinskom pravu (pravo osobnosti i trgovačko-zdravstveni aspekti). Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 40(1).
10. Rinkus, K. (2014). The Pregnancy Exclusion in Advance Directives: Are Womans’s Constitutional Rights Being Violated? Dostupno na: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?Article=1196&context=pilr
11. Silveira, M., Kim, S., Langa, K. (2010). Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before Death. The New England Journal of Medicine 362(13).
12. Sperling, D. (2005). Do pregnant women have (Living) Will? Journal of Health Care Law & Policy 8(2).
13. Wiesing, U., Jox, R., Heßler, H., Borasio, G. (2010). A new law on advance directives in Germany. Dostupno na: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49640773_A_new_law_on_advance_directives_in_Germany
Izvori prava
1. Government of Texas, Texas Advance Directive Act, Austin, 1999. Dostupno na: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.166.htm
2. Government of Texas, Texas Health & Safety Code, Austin, 2005. Dostupno na: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.671.htm
3. United States Congress, Patient Self Determination Act, Washington, 1990. Dostupno na:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/house-bill/4449/text
4. Counciel of Europe, The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 1950. Dostupno na: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_SRP.pdf
5. Counciel of Europe, Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 1997. Dostupno na: http://ravnopravnost.gov.rs/wpcontent/uploads/2012/11/images_files_Konvencija%20o%20ljudskim%20pravima%20i%20biomedicini.pdf
6. 14. Amandman Ustava SAD. Dostupno na: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2002/pdf/GPO-CONAN-2002-9-15.pdf
Sudska praksa
1. Tužbeni zahtev u postupku Munjoz vs J. P. Smith. Dostupno na: https://lrl.texas.gov/scanned/archive/2014/22695.pdf
2. Izreka presude u postupku Munjoz vs J.P. Smith. Dostupno na: http://thaddeuspope.com/images/MUNOZ_202053415-Judges-Order-on-Munoz-Matter.pdf
3. Cruzan vs Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 25.06.1990. Dostupno na: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/497/261/
4. Pretty vs UK, ( App. No. 2346/02), 29.04.2002.
Autori koji objavljuju u ovom časopisu pristaju na sledeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) pre ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka.