The relationship between lis pendens and exclusive agreed international jurisdiction in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina
Abstract
The subject of the paper refers to the analysis of the realization of the will of the contracting parties in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The exercise of the will of the Contracting Parties may be limited by the institute of lis pendens, which makes it impossible to conduct two proceedings between the same parties at the same time, giving priority to the first one, regardless of the agreed international jurisdiction. By contracting the jurisdiction of the parties, they decide which court will resolve their dispute, which is extremely important for the parties. Based on the analysis of the Hague Convention on Agreements on the Choice of Competent Court, it is concluded that preference is given to proceedings before the chosen court, with certain exceptions when the agreement of the parties will not apply. The law of Bosnia and Herzegovina applies the rules of lis pendens which may prevent the application of the agreement of the parties.
References
1. Knjige i publikacije
1. Čalija, B., Omanović, S. (2000). Građansko procesno pravo. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu.
2. Čolović, V. (2012). Međunarodno privatno pravo. Banja Luka: Panevropski univerzitet Aperion
3. Dika, M., Knežević, G., Stojanović, S. (1991). Komentar Zakona o međunarodnom privatnom i procesnom pravu. Beograd: Nomos.
4. Jones Day (2015). The Hague Choice of Court Convention Takes Effect, and With It Greater Certainty for International Transactions. Washington: Jones Day.
5. Khatri, B. (2016). The effectiveness of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in making international commercial cross-border litigation easier - A critical analysis. Victoria: University of Wellington.
6. Min, Y. T. (2013). Report of the Law Reform Committee on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law.
7. Muminović, E. (2008). Procesno međunarodno privatno pravo. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu.
2. Članci
1. Adler, M., Zarychta, M. C. (2006). The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: The United States Joins the Judgment Enforcement Band. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 27 (1), 1-38.
2. Grušić, U. (2007). Dejstvo prorogacionih sporazuma u evropskom, engleskom i srpskom pravu. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 55 (2), 156-179.
3. Lando, O., Nielsen, P.A. (2008). The Rome I Regulation. Common Market Law Review 45 (6), 1687-1725.
4. Moore, C., Jedrey, N., Rodgers, K. (2016). Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Enters into Force. Business Law Review 37 (1), 2–6.
5. Musseva, B. (2016). Opposibility of Choice-of-Court Agreements against Third Parties under The Hague Choice-of-Court Convention and Brussels Ibis Regulation. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Zenici 9 (18), 69-91.
6. Nanda, V. (2007). The Landmark 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Texas International Law Journal 42 (3), 773-788.
7. Stanivuković, M. (2012). Haška konvencija o izboru nadležnog suda-kritička procena. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 46 (3), 121-140.
8. Van Loon, H. (2007). The Hague Conference on Private International Law. Hague Justice Journal 2 (2), 3-12.
9. Van Loon, H. (2016). The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements – an introduction. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Zenici 9 (18), 11-29.
10. Wagner, R. (2011). Značaj Haške konferencije za međunarodno privatno pravo za međunarodnu saradnju u građanskim stvarima. Nova pravna revija 2 (2), 45-50.
3. Internet
1. Gerrity, R. (2016). Mining for Justice in Home Country Courts: A Canada-UK Comparison of Access to Remedy for Victims of Human Rights Violations. Preuzeto 19. 3. 2017. sa:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2882826
2. Laguardia, D.H.R., Falge, S., Franceschi, H. (2012) The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements A Discussion of Foreign and Domestic Points. Preuzeto 11. 3. 2017. sa:
http://www.shearman.com/~/media/Files/NewsInsights/Publications/2012/07/The-Hague-Convention-on-Choice-of-Court-Agreemen__/Files/View-full-article-The-Hague-Convention-on-Choice__/FileAttachment/LaguardiafalgefranceschiarticleHagueConventionon__.pdf
3. Weller, M. (2016). Choice of Forum Agreements under the Brussels I Recast and under the Hague Convention: Coherences and Clashes. Preuzeto 21. 3. 2017. sa: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2827711
4. https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=98 (3. 9. 2020.)
4. Pravni propisi
1. Haška konvenciju o sporazumima o izboru nadležnog suda od 30. 6. 2005. godine.
2. Zakon o rješavanju sukoba zakona sa propisima drugih zemalja u određenim odnosima, Službeni list SFRJ, br. 43/1982 i 72/1982.
3. Zakon o parničnom postupku pred Sudom BiH, Službeni glasnik BiH, br. 36/04, 84/07, 58/13 i 94/16.
4. Zakon o parničnom postupku FBiH, Službene novine FBiH, br. 53/03, 73/05, 19/06 i 98/15.
5. Zakon o parničnom postupku RS, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 58/03, 85/03, 74/05, 63/07, 105/08 - odluka Ustavnog suda RS, 45/09 - odluka Ustavnog suda RS, 49/09 i 61/13.
6. Zakon o parničnom postupku BDBiH, Službeni glasnik BDBiH, br. 28/18.
5. Sudska praksa
1. Odluka Ustavnog suda BiH, AP-3274/06 od 17. 11. 2008. godine.
2. Presuda Suda pravde EU od 09.03.2003. godine, Erich Gasser GmbH v MISAT-a SRL, C-116/02, EU:C:2003:657.
3. Odluka Vrhovnog suda FBiH, 53 0 Mal 000936 07 Rev od 23. 9. 2008. godine.
1. Čalija, B., Omanović, S. (2000). Građansko procesno pravo. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu.
2. Čolović, V. (2012). Međunarodno privatno pravo. Banja Luka: Panevropski univerzitet Aperion
3. Dika, M., Knežević, G., Stojanović, S. (1991). Komentar Zakona o međunarodnom privatnom i procesnom pravu. Beograd: Nomos.
4. Jones Day (2015). The Hague Choice of Court Convention Takes Effect, and With It Greater Certainty for International Transactions. Washington: Jones Day.
5. Khatri, B. (2016). The effectiveness of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in making international commercial cross-border litigation easier - A critical analysis. Victoria: University of Wellington.
6. Min, Y. T. (2013). Report of the Law Reform Committee on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law.
7. Muminović, E. (2008). Procesno međunarodno privatno pravo. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu.
2. Članci
1. Adler, M., Zarychta, M. C. (2006). The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: The United States Joins the Judgment Enforcement Band. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 27 (1), 1-38.
2. Grušić, U. (2007). Dejstvo prorogacionih sporazuma u evropskom, engleskom i srpskom pravu. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 55 (2), 156-179.
3. Lando, O., Nielsen, P.A. (2008). The Rome I Regulation. Common Market Law Review 45 (6), 1687-1725.
4. Moore, C., Jedrey, N., Rodgers, K. (2016). Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Enters into Force. Business Law Review 37 (1), 2–6.
5. Musseva, B. (2016). Opposibility of Choice-of-Court Agreements against Third Parties under The Hague Choice-of-Court Convention and Brussels Ibis Regulation. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Zenici 9 (18), 69-91.
6. Nanda, V. (2007). The Landmark 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Texas International Law Journal 42 (3), 773-788.
7. Stanivuković, M. (2012). Haška konvencija o izboru nadležnog suda-kritička procena. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 46 (3), 121-140.
8. Van Loon, H. (2007). The Hague Conference on Private International Law. Hague Justice Journal 2 (2), 3-12.
9. Van Loon, H. (2016). The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements – an introduction. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Zenici 9 (18), 11-29.
10. Wagner, R. (2011). Značaj Haške konferencije za međunarodno privatno pravo za međunarodnu saradnju u građanskim stvarima. Nova pravna revija 2 (2), 45-50.
3. Internet
1. Gerrity, R. (2016). Mining for Justice in Home Country Courts: A Canada-UK Comparison of Access to Remedy for Victims of Human Rights Violations. Preuzeto 19. 3. 2017. sa:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2882826
2. Laguardia, D.H.R., Falge, S., Franceschi, H. (2012) The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements A Discussion of Foreign and Domestic Points. Preuzeto 11. 3. 2017. sa:
http://www.shearman.com/~/media/Files/NewsInsights/Publications/2012/07/The-Hague-Convention-on-Choice-of-Court-Agreemen__/Files/View-full-article-The-Hague-Convention-on-Choice__/FileAttachment/LaguardiafalgefranceschiarticleHagueConventionon__.pdf
3. Weller, M. (2016). Choice of Forum Agreements under the Brussels I Recast and under the Hague Convention: Coherences and Clashes. Preuzeto 21. 3. 2017. sa: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2827711
4. https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=98 (3. 9. 2020.)
4. Pravni propisi
1. Haška konvenciju o sporazumima o izboru nadležnog suda od 30. 6. 2005. godine.
2. Zakon o rješavanju sukoba zakona sa propisima drugih zemalja u određenim odnosima, Službeni list SFRJ, br. 43/1982 i 72/1982.
3. Zakon o parničnom postupku pred Sudom BiH, Službeni glasnik BiH, br. 36/04, 84/07, 58/13 i 94/16.
4. Zakon o parničnom postupku FBiH, Službene novine FBiH, br. 53/03, 73/05, 19/06 i 98/15.
5. Zakon o parničnom postupku RS, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 58/03, 85/03, 74/05, 63/07, 105/08 - odluka Ustavnog suda RS, 45/09 - odluka Ustavnog suda RS, 49/09 i 61/13.
6. Zakon o parničnom postupku BDBiH, Službeni glasnik BDBiH, br. 28/18.
5. Sudska praksa
1. Odluka Ustavnog suda BiH, AP-3274/06 od 17. 11. 2008. godine.
2. Presuda Suda pravde EU od 09.03.2003. godine, Erich Gasser GmbH v MISAT-a SRL, C-116/02, EU:C:2003:657.
3. Odluka Vrhovnog suda FBiH, 53 0 Mal 000936 07 Rev od 23. 9. 2008. godine.
Published
2022/01/28
Section
Originalni naučni rad
Autori koji objavljuju u ovom časopisu pristaju na sledeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) pre ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka.