Protection of the right to marry under Article 12 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Abstract
Starting with the 21st century, the European Court of Human Rights has changed the approach regarding interpretation of the right to marry protected under Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The new liberal attitude towards the content of this right has opened up opportunities for new categories of persons to enter into marriage and start a family. The question arises whether the European Court of Human Rights will continue with this trend of interpretation and what consequences could that cause for the international understanding of marriage and family.
References
Schabas, W.A. (2016). The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press
2) Чланци
Marochini, M. (2014). The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 51(1), 63-84.
Murray, J. L. (2011). The Influence of the European Convention on Fundamental Rights on Community Law. Fordham International Law Journal 33 (5), 1388-1422.
Wildhaber, L. (2004). The European Court of Human Rights in Action. Ritsumeikan Law Review 21, 83-92.
3) Интернет извори
Irish Human Rights Commission. (2012). European Convention on Human Rights: Guide for the Civil & Public Service. Преузето 20. 06. 2020. са https://www.ihrec.ie/download/pdf/echr_guide.pdf
Van der Sloot, B. (2014). Between Fact and Fiction: An Analysis of the Case Law on Article 12 ECHR. Преузето 25. 06. 2020. са https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1561.pdf
ИЗВОРИ
Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Strasbourg, 1950.
ЦИТИРАНА СУДСКА ПРАКСА
Rees v. the United Kingdom, (App. no. 9532/81), 17. 10. 1986.
Cossey v. the United Kingdom, (App. no. 10843/84), 27. 09. 1990.
B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, (App. no. 36536/02), 13. 9. 2005.
F. v. Switzerland, (App. no. 11329/85), 18. 12. 1985.
Muñoz Díaz v. Spain, (App. no. 49151/07), 8. 12. 2009.
Jaremowicz v. Poland, (App. no. 24023/03), 5. 1. 2010.
Frasik v. Poland, (App. no. 22933/02), 5. 1. 2010.
Tyrer v. United Kingdom, (App. no. 5856/72), 25. 04. 1978.
Hammer v. United Kingdom, (App. no. 7114/75), 13. 12. 1979.
Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, (App. no. 7654/76), 06. 11. 1980.
Draper v. United Kingdom, (App. no. 8186/78), 10. 07. 1980.
C v. United Kingdom, (App. no. 10843/84), 09. 05. 1989.
I. v. the United Kingdom, (App. no. 25680/94), 11. 7. 2002.
Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, (App. no. 28957/95), 11. 7. 2002.
O’Donoghue and Others v. the United Kingdom, (App. no. 34848/07), 14. 12. 2010.
Theodorou and Tsotsorou v. Greece, (App. no. 57854/15), 5. 9. 2019.
Chernetskiy v. Ukraine, (App. no. 44316/07), 8. 12. 2016
V. K. v. Croatia, (App. no. 38380/08), 27. 11. 2012.
Autori koji objavljuju u ovom časopisu pristaju na sledeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) pre ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka.