On the Importance of Legal-Philosophical Thinking

  • Miodrag Jovanović Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Keywords: jurisprudential (legal-hilosophical) thinking, bird’s eye view, deep gaze and anatomy lesson

Abstract


The main thesis of this paper is that one can be a lawyer, even a very good lawyer, without a jurisprudential education, but that those who are educated in legal-philosophical thinking acquire an important asset that can make them better than their colleagues. In order to show this, in the first part of the paper I try to establish what it is that can be labeled a legal-philosophical thinking. In that respect, I discuss three different perspectives of that thinking, which I metaphorically - according to the names of three well-known canvases - designate as: birds eye view, deep gaze and anatomy lesson. In the central part of the work, I try to show the relevance of each of these three particular perspectives of legal-philosophical thinking for the profession of lawyer, by analyzing three well-known catchphrases related to that profession. Those catchphrases are: „two lawyers, three opinions“; „one is theory, the other is practice“; and, „lawyers look for legal loopholes.“ After analyzing them, in the final part of the paper I come to the conclusion that jurisprudential education develops argumentative potentials in the best way, sharpens both analytical and critical thinking, and all of this is of great use to graduated lawyers in their practice of law.

References

Brooks, Thom, ‘Legal Philosophy‘, Oxford Bibliographies, in ‘Philosophy’, ed. Duncan Pritchard (New York: Oxford University Press), 2023, Legal Philosophy - Philosophy - Oxford Bibliographies
• Cowley, Christopher and Nicola Padfield, The Philosophy of Criminal Law – An Introduction (London and New York: Routledge, 2024)
• Dajović, Goran, ’Proučavanje prava – Pravna nauka, teorija i filozofija’ (2017) 8 Pravni zapisi 2: 222-248.
• Dajović, Goran, Osnove pravnog rasuđivanja (Beograd: Izdavački centar Pravnog fakulteta, 2023)
• Decartes, Rene, Philosophical Writings (Vol. 1) (trans. by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch) (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985)
• Draškić, Marija, Porodično pravo i pravo deteta (Beograd: Pravni fakultet, 2015)
• Dworkin, Ronald, ’Hard Cases’ (1975) 88 Harvard Law Review 6: 1057-1109.
• Đukanović, Vladimir, ’Naučni proletarijat’, https://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/567330/Pogledi/Naucni-proletarijat
• Đurđević, Dejan B., ’Neutralni pravni poslovi’, (2010) 58 Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 2: 77-107.
• Gardner, John, ‘Why Study Jurisprudence?’ (2006) The Inner Temple Yearbook 2006/2007, https://www.dropbox.com/s/rz9l4n8nlgzk7yv/whystudyjurisprudence.pdf?dl=0
• Green, Leslie, ‘Gender and the Analytical Jurisprudential Mind’ (2020) 83 Modern Law Review 4: 893-912.
• Hart, Herbert L. A., ‘Introduction’, in Chaim Perelman, The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument (London: Routledge, 1963)
• Jovanović, Miodrag, The Nature of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)
• Jovanović, Miodrag, Duška Franeta, Uvod u filozofiju prava (2020) 92 Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 4: 742-746.
• Jovanović, Miodrag, ‘Thou Shalt Avoid Perversity in Reasoning! A Philosophical Account of (Un)reasoned Arbitral Awards’ (2023) Austrian Yearbook of Arbitration Law: 251-276.
• Kiełb, Michał, ’Legal Education from the Perspective of Legal Practice’ (2017) 7 Oñati Socio-legal Series 8: 1636-1646.
• Kirste, Stephan, Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie (Darmstadt: WBG, 2010)
• Lacey, Nicola, A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)
• Lewin, Kurt, ’Psychology and the Process of Group Living’ (1943) 17 The Journal of Social Psychology 1: 113-131.
• Marmor, Andrei, ’How Law is Like a Chess’ (2006) 12 Legal Theory 4: 347-371.
• Pennock, J. Roland, ‘Reason in Legislative Decisions’ in Carl J. Friedrich (ed.), Rational Decision (New York: Atherton Press, 1964 )
• Perelman, Chaim, The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument (London: Routledge, 1963)
• Pokrovac, Zoran, ’Je li, doista, uvijek i svuda, sve što nije zabranjeno dopušteno? Pokušaj jedne teorijskopravne kozerije’ (2019) 69 Zbornik PFZ 5-6: 663-680.
• Spaić, Bojan, Priroda i determinante sudijskog tumačenja prava (Beograd: Izdavački centar Pravnog fakulteta, 2020)
• Stojanović, Zoran, Krivično pravo – opšti deo (Beograd: Pravna knjiga, 2019)
• Stojanović, Zoran, Krivično pravo – posebni deo (Novi Sad: Centar za izdavačku delatnost Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Novom Sadu, 2022)
• Summers, Robert S., ‘The New Analytical Jurist’ (1966) 41 New York University Law Review 5: 861–896.
• Vasić, Radmila, Miodrag Jovanović i Goran Dajović, Uvod u pravo (Beograd: Izdavački centar Pravnog fakulteta, 2014)
Published
2025/12/10
Section
Originalni naučni rad