BLACK HULLED BARLEY MARKETING PRICES vs. WHITE in SOUTH-EAST ANATOLIA

  • Fethiye Özberk Assoc. Prof.dr..
  • İrfan Özberk
  • Huseyin Ayhan
  • Merve Bayhan
  • Fahriye İpeksever

Sažetak


This study aimed to assess the presence of various ratios of black and white hulled grains in barley grain lots and impacts on marketing price. The study was carried out in Sanlıurfa commodity market in the autumn of 2005 in Sanlıurfa and Diyarbakir in 2015 and Sanliurfa, Adıyaman and Gaziantep local commodity markets in 2017. The seven barley grain samples were prepared [ 100% White (W), 10% Black(B)+90% White(W), 20%B+80%W, 30%B+70%W, 40%B+60%W, 50%B+50%W and 100% Black] and presented to randomly selected four grain purchasers in all commodity markets and marketing price offers were scored. Some of grain quality traits such as protein ratio (%), hectoliter weights (kg), 1000 kernel weights (g) and grain plumpness (%) were also scored in the final year. Increasing ratios of black-hulled barley (BHB) reduced marketing price gradually in 2005. A 0.180 US$ kg-1 was offered to 100% White-Hulled Barley (WHB) whereas only 0.168 US$ kg-1 for 100% BHB in Sanlıurfa. In 2015, these were 0.337 US$ kg-1 for white and 0.365 US$ kg-1 for black in Sanliurfa and 0.334 US$ kg-1 for white and 0.352 US$ kg-1 for black in Diyarbakir. In 2017, WHB received 0.292 US$ kg-1 marketing price offer and BHB 0.274 US$ kg-1 in Adıyaman whereas in both Sanliurfa and Gaziantep these turned out to be in favor of BHB and it received 0.37 US$ kg-1 and 0.321 US$ kg-1 marketing price offers respectively. Those of WHB marketing prices were 0.325 US$ kg-1 and 0.315 US$ kg-1 in both locations respectively.  Regression equations obtained from 2017 data could be used for price estimates reliably with high coefficients of determinations.

It was concluded that except Adıyaman, barley marketing prices traditionally in favor of white hulled turned out to be in favor of black type in a decade in south-east Anatolia. But the less return and yielding ability of BHB may not be sufficient for its survival in long term

Reference

Açıkgöz N., İlker E., & Gökçöl A. (2004). Totemstat Statistics Packages. Bornova, Izmir: Aegean University Seed Technology Center Publication no:2 ,

Akıncı, C., Gül,İ., & Çölkesen, M. (1999). Diyarbakır koşullarında bazı arpa çeşitlerinin tane ve ot verimi ile bazı verim unsurlarının belirlenmesi. 3. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, (s.405-410). Adana .

Anonymous, (2005). Turkish Grain Board inland Sale Prices 2005. http://www.tmo.gov.tr.

Anonymous, (1999). US Standards for Barley. http://www.gipsa.usda.gov./reference-library/standards/810 barley97.pdf. .

Anonim, (1990). AACC Standart, American Assocition of Creal Chemistry, USA

Bassam T.Y., & Al-Omary S.S. (1994). Analysis of the effects of water stress on leaf growth and yield of three barley cultivars. Irrigation Sci.V.14(3),157-162.

Bishaw Z.J. (2004). Wheat and barley seed systems in Ethiopia and Syria. Wageningen Univ.dissertation no:3575

Brush StB.,& Meng E. (1998). Farmer’s valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources. Gen. Resources and Crop Evolution 45, 139-150.

Ceccarelli S.,& Grando S. (1999). Barley landraces from the Fertile Crescent: A lesson for plant breeders. In: Brush S.B. (ed), Genes in the Field: On-farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, IBGRI/IDRC/Lewis Publishers, (pp. 51-76). Boca Raton, FL.

Choo T.M., Vigier B., Ceccarelli S., Grando S., & Frankowiak J.D. (2005). Comparison of black, purple, and yellow barleys. Genetic Resources and Crop Evalution 52,121-126.

Eberhard S.A., & Russel W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties, Crop sci., 6, 36-40.

Finlay K.W., & Wilkinson G.N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme Avust. J.of Agr. Res., 29, 897-912.

Harlan J.R. (1975). Our vanishing genetic resources; modern varieties replace ancient populations that have provide variability for plant breeding programs. Science, 188,618-621.

Harlan J.R. (1992). Crops and man, WI.; ASA, CSSA ( 2nd.ed).

Jaradat A.A. (1997). Biodiversity and sustainable agriculture in the Fertile Crescent. Panel: Agriculture, Pastoralism and Development, In the conference Transformations of Middle Eastern Natural Environments: Legacies and Lessons, Oct.28-Nov.1., Yale Univ. USA.

Nygaard D. (1983). Tests on farmer’s fields: The ICARDA experience. Proceedings of the first farming system research symposium, Kansas State Univ. Manhattan, (pp.76-81). USA.

Ozberk I., Atlı A., Pfeiffer W., Ozberk F., & Coskun Y. (2005). The effect of sunn pest (Eurigaster integriceps) damage on durum wheat: impact in the market place. Crop Prot 24, 267-274.

Ozberk I., & Ozberk F. (1993). Bread wheat,durum wheat and barley improvement project in the GAP region, Result report.Southeastern Anatolia Agr.Res. Inst.P.O:Box.72, Diyarbakir,Turkey.

Özkaya, H. & Kahveci, B., (1990). Tahıl ve Ürünleri Analiz Yöntemleri. Gıda Teknolojisi Derneği Yayınları, No:14, (s. 1-152). Ankara.

Tolbert D.M., Qualset C.O., Jain S.K.,& Craddock J.R. (1979). A diversity analysis of a world collection of barley. Crop Sci. 19, 789-794.

TUİK, 2017. Türkiye bitkisel üretim verileri. http://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul.

Uluöz M. (1965). Wheat, flour and bread analysis methods. Publication no: 57. Aegean University, Bornova, Izmir.

Williams, P., El-Heramain, F. V., Nakkaul, H., & Rihawi, S., (1986). Crop Quality Evaluation Methods and Guidelmes ICARDA, Halep

Zohary D.,& Hopf M. (1993). Domestication of plants in the old World. Oxford: Clerandon Press.

Objavljeno
2020/10/15
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak