Comparison of some functional and anthropometric parameters as risk factors for gender fragility in the elderly people

  • Natalija Hadživuković Department of Health Care, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Medicine Foca, The Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-3171
  • Jelena Pavlović Department of Health Care, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Medicine Foca, The Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8591-4316
  • Maja Račić Department of Primary Health Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-9130
  • Nedeljka Ivković Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of East Sarajevo; Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-4144
  • Olivera Kalajdžić Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine in Foca, University of East Sarajevo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-0559
  • Ranka Perućica Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Medicine in Foca, University of East Sarajevo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-0559
  • Srdjan Živanović Department of Health Care, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Medicine Foca, The Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ljubiša Kucurski Department of Nursing, The Public Institution Medical College, Prijedor
Keywords: Elderly, fragility, functional status, anthropometric parameters

Abstract


Introduction. A specific characteristic of the elderly
is brittleness or fragility, and due to its prevalence, fragility
needs to be understood as a public health priority. The aim of
the study was to examine the association of functional and
anthropometric parameters with fragility in persons over 65
years of age.
Method. The study was designed as a cross-sectional
study and included 446 elderly people. As research instruments,
a general questionnaire was used to assess the
functional status of the Tinetti test and, of anthropometric
parameters, the circumference of the upper arm and the circumference
of the middle part of the lower leg. We used the
χ2 test and Pearson’s correlation analysis as statistical tests.
Results. Females had poorer functional status, walking,
and balance compared to males (χ2 = 4.125; p <0.127). It
was observed males subjects had higher values of upper arm
circumference (26.96 ± 3.44) compared to females, while females
had higher values of the middle circumference of the
lower leg (32.66 ± 6.29). Analyzing the correlation of anthropometric
measurements with the total score of the Tinetti test
and in relation to subjects` gender, it was noticed there is a
correlation analysis between the parameters.
Conclusion. A high percentage of people over the age
of 65 have poor functional status, as well as lower values of
anthropometric markers, suggesting that they may be potential
risk factors for the fragility in the elderly.

References

Karunananthan S, Wolfson C, Bergman H,

Beland F, Hogan DB. A multidisciplinary

systematic literature review on frailty:

overview of the methodology used by the

Canadian Initiative on Frailty and Aging.

BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:68.

Lepeleire JD, IIiffe S, Mann E, IIiffe S,

Mann E, Degryse JM, et al. Frailty: an

emerging concept for general practice. Br

J Gen Pract 2009;59: 177-187.

Rodríguez-Mañas L, Féart C, Mann

G, Viña J, Chatterji S, Chodzko-Zajko

WJ et al. Searching for an operational

definition of frailty: a delphi method based

consensus statement. The frailty operative

definition-consensus conference project.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013;68:

-7.

Fedarko NS. The Biology of Aging and

Frailty. Clin Geriatr Med

;27:27–37.

Clegg A; Young J; Iliffe S; Rikkert MO;

Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people.

Lancet. 2013; 381:752-762.

Xue QL Frailty Syndrome; Definition

and Natural History. Clin Geriatr

Med2011;27:1–15.

Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster JY,

Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Burden

of frailty in the elderly population:

perspectives for a public health challenge.

Arch Public Health 2015;73:19.

Gale CR, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Prevalence

of frailty and disability: findings from the

English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.Age

Ageing 2015;44:162–165.

Carneiro JA, Ramos GCF, Barbosa ATF,

Mendonça JMG, Costa FM, Caldeira

AP. Prevalence and factors associated

with frailty in non-institutionalized older

adults. Rev Bras Enferm 2016;69:435-42.

Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA,

Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty

in community-dwelling older persons:

a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc

;60:1487–1492.

Tinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R.

Fall Risk Index for elderly patients based

onnumber of chronic disabilities. Am J

Med 1986:80:429-434.

Physical status: the use and interpretation

of anthropometry. WHO Expert

Committee Report. World Health Organ

Tech Rep Ser 1995;854:1-452.

Rolland Y, Abellan van Kan G, Gillette-

Guyonnet S, Vellas B. Cachexia versus

sarcopenia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab

Care 2011;14:15–21.

Peterson SJ, Mozer M. Differentiating

sarcopenia and cachexia among patients

with cancer. Nutr Clin Pract 2017;32:

–9.

Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ,

Solomon DH, Young RT, Kamberg CJ, et

al. The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool

for identifying vulnerable older people

in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc

;49:1691–9.

Zhang XS, Liu YH, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Yu

Q, Yu Xet al. Handgrip strength as a

predictor of nutritional status in Chinese

elderly inpatients at hospital admission.

Biomed Environ Sci 2017;30:802-10.

Argilés JM, Busquets S, Stemmler

B, López-Soriano FJ. Cachexia and

sarcopenia: mechanisms and potential

targets for intervention. Curr Opin

Pharmacol 2015;22:100–6.

Zdzieblik D, Oesser S, Baumstark

MW, Gollhofer A, König D. Collagen

peptide supplementation in combination

with resistance training improves body

composition and increases muscle strength

in elderly sarcopenic men: a randomised

controlled trial. Br J Nutr 2015;114:

–45.

Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantchia

P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, et al.

Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of

the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J

Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15:95-101.

Lee D, Shook RP, Drenowatz C, Blair

SN. Physical activity and sarcopenic

obesity: definition, assessment,

prevalence, and mechanism. Future Sci

OA2016;2:FSO127.

Polyzos SA, Margioris AN. Sarcopenic

obesity. Hormones (Athens, Greece)

;17:321-331.

JafariNasabian P, Inglis JE, Wendimere R,

Kelly OJ, Ilich JZ. Aging human body:

changes in bone, muscle, and body fat with

consequent changes in nutrient intake.J

Endocrinol 2017;234:R37–R51.

Kalinkovich A, Livshits G. Sarcopenic

obesity or obese sarcopenia: a cross talk

between age-associated adipose tissue and

skeletal muscle inflammation as a main

mechanism of the pathogenesis. Ageing

Res Rev2017;35:200–221.

Wannamethee SG, Atkins JL. Muscle

loss and obesity: the health implications of

sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. Proc

Nutr Soc2015;74:405–12.

Kwon HJ, Ha YC, Park HM.

The Reference Value of Skeletal

Muscle Mass Index for Defining the

Sarcopenia of Women in Korea. J Bone

Metab2015;22:71-5.

Published
2022/04/22
How to Cite
Hadživuković, N., Pavlović, J., Račić, M., Ivković, N., Kalajdžić, O., Perućica, R., Živanović, S., & Kucurski, L. (2022). Comparison of some functional and anthropometric parameters as risk factors for gender fragility in the elderly people. General Practice, 28(1-2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.5937/opmed28-35467
Section
Original article