Person and/or Nature: Review of the Larche’s Criticism of Metropolitan John Zizioulas
Abstract
Larche equals person and individual, and there comes his misunderstanding of Zizioulas. He does not understand that person is a word for relation, and that way staying among the borders of classic scholastic thought. In the other hand, he understands the nature to be a realistic different entity in which persons participate. Because, the Fathers that Larche mentions in many places are directly opposite to Larches thought, he is forced to stretch his interpretation, and is forced to come up with contradictory statements, of many which we have shown.
References
Belley, C. A. (2008). Gregory of Nazianzus on the Trinity and the Knowledge of God: In Your Light We Shall See Light. Oxford.
Zizioulas, J. D. (2006). Communion and Otherness. T&T Clark.
Зизијулас, Ј. (2009). Догматске теме. Нови Сад.
Zizioulas, J. D. (2010). The One and the Many; Studies on God, Man, the Church, and the World Today. Sebastian Press.
Zizioulas, J. D. (2011). The Eucharistic Communion and the World. T&T Clark.
Ларше, Ж. (2014). Злоупотреба Светог Максима Исповедника зарад једне савремене идеологије. Црквене студије, 11, 705–720.
Ларше, Ж. (2015). Личност и природа: Православна критика персоналистичких теорија Христа Јанараса и Јована Зизијуласа. Ниш: Пунта.
Lossky, V. (1974). In the Image and Likeness of God. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
Melchisedec, T. (2015). Union and Distinction in the Thought of St Maximus the Confessor. Oxford University Press.
Папаниколау, А. (2012). Бити са Богом: Тројица, апофатичко богословље и богочовечанска заједница. Требиње.
Prestige, G. L. (1969). God in Patristic Thought. London.
Widdicombe, P. (1974). The Fatherhood of God From Origen to Athanasius. Oxford.
Prijavom priloga za objavljivanje, putem ovog sistema elektronskog uređivanja, autor sva prava ustupa uredništvu časopisa „Sabornost – Teološki godišnjak“.