INTERAKTIVNOST U NASTAVNOM PROCESU: EFEKAT DEMOGRAFSKIH PROMENA

  • Ana Đ. Jovičić Vuković Visoka poslovna škola strukovnih studija Novi Sad
  • Maja Vukadinović Visoka škola strukovnih studija Novi Sad
  • Nataša Papić-Blagojević Visoka poslovna škola strukovnih studija Novi Sad
Ključne reči: interaktivnost, nastavni proces, procene studenata, visokoškolske institucije

Sažetak


Cilj ovog istraživanja je da se ispitaju procene interaktivnosti u nastavnom procesu kod studenata. Uzorak je činilo 361 student. Od demografskih varijabli ispitivani su pol, godina studija, model finansiranja studija, mesto u kom žive, prethodno obrazovanje i visokoškolska institucija koju pohađaju. Učesnici su trebali da procene svoje iskustvo na Likertovoj skali u vezi sa tim koliko je interaktivnost izražena u nastavnom procesu škole koju pohađaju. Rezultati su pokazali da je ukupna procena interaktivnosti relativno visoka (M= 3.98, SD=.850), kao da se studenti razlikuju u svojim procenama u odnosu na to koju visoku školu pohađaju (F(4, 360) = 3.187, p<.014). Rezultati su diskutovani u kontekstu mogućeg unapređenja interaktivnosti u okviru nastavnog procesa.  

Ključne reči: interaktivnost, nastavni proces, procene studenata, visokoškolske institucije  

Biografija autora

Ana Đ. Jovičić Vuković, Visoka poslovna škola strukovnih studija Novi Sad

predavač

Reference

Benware C. A. & Deci E. L (1984). Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004755

Healey, R. L. (2012). The power of debates? Reflections on their potential for geography in higher education: teaching for social transformation through debate. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 239-25.

Healey, M., Flint, A. and Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership students partners-learning-and-teaching-higher.

Healey, M. and Healey R. L. (2019) Students as partners guide: Student engagement through partnership. York: Advance HE. 

Hoque, Md. E. (2016). The Effect of the Teacher-Students Interaction: An Evaluation of an EFL Classroom. The Journal of EFL Education and Research JEFLE, 1.

Kobayashi, K. (2019). Interactivity: A Potential Determinant of Learning by Preparing to Teach and Teaching. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 27-55.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02755

Kutbiddinova R. A., Eromasova, A. A., & Romanova, M.A. (2016). The Use of Interactive Methods in the Educational Process of the Higher Education Institution. International journal of environmental & science education, 11(14), 6557-6572.

Miller, P. (2012). Ten Characteristics of a Good Teacher. English Teaching Forum, 1, 36-38.

Rajapriya, M. and Kumar, N. (2017). Effectiveness of mind mapping in higher education. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(4), 975-98.

Stewart R. A. (1989). Interaction effects of teacher enthusiasm and student note taking on recall and recognition of lecture content, Communication Research Reports, 610.1080/08824098909359838https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098909359838>

Walker R. (2008). Twelve characteristics of an effective teacher. A Longitudinal, Qualitative, Quasi-Research Study of In-service and Pre-service Teachers' Opinions Educational horizons, 61-68.

Wang, Y., Lin, L., & Chen, O. (2121). The benefits of teaching on comprehension, motivation, and perceived difficulty: Empirical evidence of teaching expectancy and the interactivity of teaching. British Journal of Education Psychology, 91(4),1275-1290. DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12416.

Yea, K. (2019) Interactive techniques. Retrieved from

https://www.usf.edu/atle/documents/handout-interactive-techniques.pdf

Objavljeno
2024/02/01
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak