DIGITALIZACIJA EKONOMIJE I PITANJE NEJEDNAKOSTI U GLOBALNOM DRUŠTVU
Sažetak
Sve veći prosperitet, kao i koegzistencija upornih i dubokih nejednakosti, jedan je od najvećih paradoksa našeg vremena, koji podriva i dovodi u pitanje globalne razvojne i modernizacijske procese u današnjem svetu. Nema sumnje da digitalna revolucija transformiše ekonomije na globalnom nivou, donoseći sa sobom ogromne potencijalne ekonomske dobitke, ali i nove izazove. U eri složenih ekoloških, geopolitičkih, ekonomskih i tehnoloških rizika posebno je upadljiva tzv. rastuća društvena fragmentacija koja se, između ostalog, manifestuje kroz snažno širenje digitalnih nejednakosti (i digitalnog jaza kao povezanog koncepta) što dodatno podriva društvenu koheziju i globalnu kooperaciju. Iako je digitalni napredak kreirao ogromno bogatstvo u rekordnom roku, ostao je koncentrisan oko malog broja pojedinaca, kompanija i zemalja, a sva predviđanja su da će se ova putanja nastaviti dodatno produbljujući već rastuću nejednakost. U radu se analiziraju nejednakosti i raslojavanje digitalne sfere i nastoji se uspostaviti veza između održivog razvoja, brzih tehnoloških promena i pitanja nejednakosti, te na taj način podstakne debata i promišljanje ovog izazova za same istraživače i javne praktičare u globalnom kontekstu, primenom naučne metode sistematizacije i analize. U narednom periodu nove politike pod okriljem nove agende moraće mnogo bolje da odgovore na novu dinamiku digitalne ekonomije kako bi se došlo do inkluzivnijih rezultata u globalnom svetu. U svetu u kome više od polovine građana nema ili ima ograničen pristup internetu, mora se intenzivno raditi na zatvaranju digitalnog jaza (posebno u pristupu internetu), dok bi inkluzivnost bila ključna za izgradnju digitalne ekonomije koja donosi sve ono što je presudno za ekonomsku mobilnost i društvenu participaciju. Saradnička akcija potrebna je danas, kako bi se kriva digitalne transformacije savijala ka prosperitetnijem sutra.
Reference
Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 7-72.
Acharya, B. (2017). Conceptual evolution of the digital divide: A systematic review of the literature over a period of five years (2010-2015). World of media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 1, 41-74.
Andrews, D., Nicoletti, G., & Timiliotis, C. (2018). Digital technology diffusion: A matter of capabilities, incentives or both?, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1476.
Antonelli, C. (2003). The digital divide: understanding the economics of new information and communication technology in the global economy. Information Economics and Policy, 15(2), 173-199.
Atkinson, R. D., & Mckay, A. (2007). Understanding the Economic Benefits of the Information Technology Revolution. Digital Prosperity, March 2007, The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF).
Björk Gudmundsdottir, G. (2010). From digital divide to digital opportunities? A critical perspective on the digital divide in South African schools (Dissertation submitted for the degree of Ph.D). University of Oslo, Faculty of Educational Sciences.
Büchi, M., & Vogler, F. (2017). Testing a digital inequality model for online political participation. Socius, 3, 1–13.
Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2018). How Social Well-Being Is Affected by Digital Inequalities. International Journal of Communication,12(2018), 3686–3706.
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) (2018). Preparing for disruption -Technological Readiness Ranking. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited.
George I. (2021). Bridging the global digital divide: A platform to advance digital development in low - and middle-income countries. Brookings Global Working Paper, No. 157. Center for Sustainable Development, Brookings Institution.
Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute. The Digital Platform Economy Index 2020, retrieved from: https://thegedi.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/12/DPE-2020-Report-Final.pdf
Heeks, R. (2021). From digital divide to digital justice in the global south: conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation. In Proceedings of the 1st Virtual Conference on Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development (766-776). Centre for Digital Development, Global Development Institute, University of Manchester, UK.
Hernandez, K., & Roberts, T. (2018). Leaving None Behind in a Digital World. K4D Emerging Issues Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), (2018). Measuring the Information Society Report, Vol. 1, 2018, Geneva: ITU.
ISSC, IDS & UNESCO (2016). World Social Science Report 2016, Challenging Inequalities: Pathways to a Just World. UNESCO Publishing, Paris.
ITU (2019). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2019. ITU Publications, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva Switzerland.
ITU (2020). Measuring digital development - Facts and figures 2020. ITU Publications, International Telecommunication Union, Development Sector, Geneva Switzerland. Retrieved from: https://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2020.pdf
Larghi, B. S., Lemus, M., Moguillansky, M., & Welschinger, L. N. (2015). Digital and social inequalities: A qualitative assessment of the impact of the connecting equality program on Argentinean youth. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 69(1), 1-20.
Maceviciute, E., & Wilson, T. D. (2018). Digital means for reducing digital inequality: Literature review. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 21, 269-287.
Mardikyan, S., Ayçiçek Yıldız, E., DeryaOrdu, M., & Şimşek, B. (2015). Examining the Global Digital Divide: A Cross-Country Analysis. Communications of the IBIMA, Article ID 592253.
Nieminen, H. (2016). The digital divide and beyond: What do we know of information and communications technology’s long-term social effects? Some uncomfortable questions. European Journal of Communication, 31(1), 19-32.
Opening Education, (2007). Beyond the digital divide: Rethinking digital inclusion for the 21st century. Retrieved from: www.futurelab.org.uk/openingeducation.
Portulans Institute (2020). The Network Readiness Index 2020 - Accelerating Digital Transformation in a post-COVID Global Economy. Available at: www.networkreadinessindex.org
Qureshi, Z. (2021). Technology, growth, and inequality - Changing dynamics in the digital era. Global Working Paper, No.152. Global Economy and Development Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
Ramalingam, B., & Hernandez, K. (2016). The multiple forms of digital inequality. In World social science report 2016: Challenging inequalities: Pathways to a just world (pp. 68–69). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Rao, S. S. (2005). Bridging digital divide: Efforts in India. Telematics and Informatics, 22(4), 361-375.
Reinartz, A. (2016). Digital Inequality and the Use of Information Communication Technology. Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften an der Universität Passau.
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., . . .Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.
Sorj, B. (2008). The dimensions of the digital divide. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein de Pesquisa Social, 44-57.
South Centre (2021). Technology and inequality: can we decolonise the digital world? Padmashree Gehl Sampath, South Views, No. 215.
Sparks, C. (2013). What is the "the digital divide" and why is it important? Javnost – The Public, 20(2), 27-46.
State of Broadband Report (2019). Geneva International Telecommunication Union and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
State of Broadband Report (2020). Geneva International Telecommunication Union and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
TWI2050 - The World in 2050 (2019). The Digital Revolution and Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria, available at: www.twi2050.org
United Nations (2017). Information Economy Report 2017: Digitalization, trade and development. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). United Nations Publication.
United Nations (2020). E-Government Survey 2020, Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development - With addendum on COVID-19 Response. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
United Nations (2021). Technology and Innovation Report 2021 - Catching technological waves innovation with equity. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). United Nations Publication.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2019). Digital Economy Report 2019, Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries. Geneva: UN.
van Deursen, A. J., Helsper, E., Eynon, R., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication, 11, 452-473.
van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2005). The Deepening Divide. Inequality in the Information Society. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.
van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235.
van Dijk, Jan (2020). The Digital Divide. Cambridge UK, Medford MA: Polity Press.
Várallyai, L., Herdon, M., & Botos, S. (2015). Statistical Analyses of Digital Divide Factors. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 364-372.
Vartanova, E., & Gladkova, A. (2019). New forms of the digital divide. In Digital media inequalities: Policies against divides, distrust and discrimination (pp. 193-213). Göteborg: Nordicom.
World Bank (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital dividends. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Economic Forum (2021). The Global Risks Report 2021. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) pre ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka (Vidi Efekti otvorenog pristupa).