Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Sociološki pregled
  • Register
  • Login
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 52 No. 2 (2018)

Published: 2018/08/14

Original scientific paper

    • PDF
    The Communist Manifesto, 170 Years Later
    Samir Amin
    • PDF
    The Long Shadows of the Manifesto of the Communist Party
    Todor Đ. Kuljić
    • PDF
    Crossroads and Alternatives of the Contemporary Left (Marginalia on the Occasion of 170 years Since The First Edition of the Communist Manifesto)
    Ljubiša R. Mitrović
    • PDF
    On Historical Regression: A Note at the Occasion of the 170th Anniversary of the Manifesto
    Rastko Močnik
    • PDF
    Reflections on The Communist Manifesto from Third World Socialism
    Charles McKelvey
    • PDF
    Manifesto of the Communist Party from the Viewpoint of Social Responsibility
    Matijaž Mulej
    • PDF
    Karl Marx: Manifesto, Radical Democracy Or Futuristic Alchemy
    Milojica M. Šutović
    • PDF
    In Search For New Manifesto
    Boris R. Bratina, Oksana A. Bratina

Review scientific paper

    • PDF
    Manifesto of the Communist Party 170 Years After The First Edition: Introduction to the Thematic Issue of Sociološki pregled / Sociological review
    Vera A. Vratuša
    • PDF
    Communist Manifesto and The Peasantry Of The 21st Century
    Srđan Lj. Šljukić, Marica N. Šljukić
    • PDF
    Manifesto of the Communist Party – Reception and Criticism
    Jovica D. Trkulja

Opinion Reviews

    • PDF
    British Policy Towards the Balkans
    Aleksandra M. Kolakovic
    • PDF
    Sociology in the Pocket
    Radica M. Nedeljković
Language
  • English
  • Srpski
MAKE A SUBMISSION
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
© Copyright 2025. Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science

This field is required.
Close  
Ensuring a Blind Peer Review

To ensure the integrity of the blind peer-review for submission to this journal, every effort should be made to prevent the identities of the authors and reviewers from being known to each other. This involves the authors, editors, and reviewers (who upload documents as part of their review) checking to see if the following steps have been taken with regard to the text and the file properties:

  1. The authors of the document have deleted their names from the text, with Author and year used in the references and footnotes, instead of the authors' name, article title, etc.;
  2. With Microsoft Office documents, author identification should also be removed from the properties for the file (see under File in Word), by clicking on the following, beginning with File on the main menu of the Microsoft application: File > Save As > Tools (or Options with a Mac) > Security > Remove personal information from file properties on save > Save.
  3. With PDFs, the authors' names should also be removed from Document Properties found under File on Adobe Acrobat's main menu.