PROCENA RADNIH SPOSOBNOSTI, SKLONOSTI I VEŠTINA OSOBA SA INTELEKTUALNOM OMETENOŠĆU
Abstract
Za koncipiranje programa profesionalnog i radnog osoposobljavanja osoba sa intelektualnom ometenošću (IO) od esencijalne važnosti su strategije procene radnih sposobnosti i veština. Najvažnija komponenta funkcionalne procene nije utvrđivanje prisustva ometenosti, ili rasvetljavanje deficita koji je u osnovi ometenosti, nego mera u kojoj intelektualna ometenost ograničava profesionalne i druge aktivnosti vezane za samostalan život osobe. Potencijali i ograničenja osobe sa IO se razmatraju u kontekstu razvoja i definisanja odgovarajućih profesionalnih ciljeva, kao i identifikacije službi potrebnih za postizanje neposrednih i dugotrajnih ciljeva profesionalne rehabilitacije. Procena radnih sposobnosti, sklonosti i veština je deo procesa koji treba da započne u detinjstvu, u cilju multidimenzionalnog sagledavanja svih činilaca koji utiču na profesionalno osposobljavanje, zapošljavanje i potencijal za samostalan život osoba sa intelektualnom ometenošću. Sveobuhvatan pristup, u koji su uključene osobe sa intelektualnom ometenošću i njihove porodice, od suštinske je važnosti za proces odgovarajućeg akademskog usmerenja, radne obuke i nivoa društvene podrške.
References
Beveridge, S., Heller Craddock, S., Liesener, J., Stapleton, M., & Hershenson, D. (2002). INCOME: A framework for conceptualizing the career development of persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 195-206.
Chan, F., Reid, C., Kaskel, M., Roldan, G., Rahimi, M., & Mpofu, E. (1997). Vocational assessment and evaluation of people with disabilities. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 8, 311-325.
Clark, G. M. (2008). Transition assessment for planning with secondary-level students with learning disabilities. In G. Blalock, J.R. Patton, P. Kohler & D. Bassett (Eds.). Transition and students with learning disabilities (pp. 105-123). Austin, TX: The Hammill Institute on Disabilities.
Clark, G. M. ( 2007). Assessment for Transition Planning, 2ed, Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
Corbiere, M., Mercier, C., Lesage, AD. (2004). Perceptions of Barriers to Employment, Coping Efficacy, and Career Search Efficacy in people with Mental Health Illness. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4), 460-478.
Fajgelj, S. (2004). Metode istraživanja ponašanja. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.
Gouvier, W.D., Systma-Jordan, S., & Mayville, S. (2003). Patterns of discrimination hiring job applicants with disabilities: The role of disability type, job complexity, and public contact. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48(3), 175-181.
Gligorović M., Radić Šestić M., Buha Đurović N. (2011). Procena kognitivnih, perceptivnih i motoričkih sposobnosti osoba sa intelektualnom ometenošću u procesu profesionalne rehabilitacije, Beogradska defektološka škola, 17/3 (5), 549-570.
Kamens, M. W., Dolyniuk, C. A. & Dinardo, P. (2003). Preparing teachers for the transition of students with disabilities through community-based instruction. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 99-117.
Levinson, E. M., & Palmer, E. J. (2005). Preparing students with disabilities for school-to-work transition and postschool life [Electronic Version]. Principal Leadership, 5, 11. Retrieved November 2, 2011 from ProQuest Psychology Journals
Loprest, P., & Maag, E. (2001). Barriers and supports for work among adults with disabilities: Results from the NHIS-D. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Martin, J. E., Van Dycke, J. L., Christensen, W. R., Greene, B. A., Emmett, G. J., & Lovett, D. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299-316
Mpofu E, Oakland T. (2010). Assessment in rehabilitation and health. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education, Inc.
Mpofu, E., & Wilson, K. B. (2004). Opportunity structure and transition practices with students with disabilities: The role of family, culture, and community. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 35(2), 9-16.
Niles, S. G., & Harris-Bowlsbey, J. (2009). Career development and diverse populations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Neubert, D. A. (2003). The role of assessment in the transition to adult life process for students with disabilities. Exceptionality, 11, 63-72.
Niles, S. G., & Harris-Bowlsbey, J. (2009). Career development and diverse populations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Ochs, L.A. & Roessler, R.T. (2004). Predictors of career exploration intentions: A social cognitive theory perspective. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 47(4), 224-233.
Perrone, K.M., Perrone, P.A., Chan, F., & Thomas, K.R. (2000). Assessing efficacy and importance in career counseling competencies. Career Development Quarterly, 48, 212-225.
Power, P. (2006). A guide to vocational assessment (4th Ed.). Austin TX:Pro-Ed.
Rusch, F. R. (2008). Beyond high school: Preparing adolescents for tomorrow's challenges. Columbus, OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Salvia, J. and Ysseldyke, J. (2004). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
Sattler J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations. 5th ed. La Mesa (CA): Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.
Saunders, J.L., Leahy, M.J., McGlynn, C. & Estrada-Hernandez, N. (2006). Predictors of employment outcomes for persons with disabilities: An integrative review of potential evidenced-based factors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 37. 234-246.
Scarborough, J. L., & Gilbride, D. D. (2006). Developing relationships with rehabilitation counselors to meet the transition needs of students with disabilities. Professional School Counseling, 221-232.
Schmitz, T. (2008). Transition planning, special education law, and its impact on your child. The Exceptional Parent, 38 (10), 37-39.
Timmons, J., Podmostko, M., Bremer, C., Lavin, D., &Wills, J. (2005). Career planning begins with assessment: A guide for professionals serving youth with educational & career development challenges (Rev. Ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth, Institute for Educational Leadership.