Comparison of indirect and descriptive methods of functional behaviour assessment in adults with intellectual disability
Abstract
Introduction. Adults with intellectual disability exhibit challenging behavior more frequently than the population with typical development. Functional behavior assessment is an effective and scientifically-based way of reducing individual challenging behavior. Two types of methods are used in the functional behavior assessment process: indirect and descriptive. Aim. The purpose of this research was to examine the consistency between the results obtained using both methods. Methods. A multiple case study included three adults with moderate intellectual disability. Two people were 18 years old and one person was 19 years old. All three people showed different forms of challenging behavior. Data was collected using indirect and descriptive methods. We compared the findings of the function of the challenging behavior using both methods. Although three participants were included in the study, we collected data related to the function of behavior for four different forms of challenging behavior. Results. In the case of the first participant, the same function of problematic behavior, ʼdisobeying the rulesʼ, was determined by using both methods of functional behavior assessment, which was ʼgetting attentionʼ. In the case of the second participant, only one form of problematic behavior, ʼtalking to oneselfʼ, obtained the same function of problematic behavior, which was ʼgetting attentionʼ, while another form of problematic behavior, ʼrepeating the same phrasesʼ, obtained a different function. In the case of the third participant, different results were obtained for problematic behavior ʼnon-cooperationʼ. Conclusion. The research showed that data related to the function of challenging behavior were consistent only in two cases (50%). Considering the obtained results, the results about the function of problematic behavior obtained using only one method of functional assessment of behavior should be interpreted with caution.
References
Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2006). Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers (Seventh Edition). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Alter, P. J., Conroy, M. A., Mancil, G. R., & Haydon, T. (2008). A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(2), 200-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9064-3
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91
Baylot Casey, L., & Carter, L., S. (2024). Applied behavior analysis in early childhood education. (Second edition). Routledge.
Borrero, C. S. W., England, J. D., Sarcia, B., & Woods, J. N. (2016). A Comparison of Descriptive and Functional Analyses of Inappropriate Mealtime Behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(4), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0149-5
Call, N., Bernstein, A., O'Brien, M., Schieltz, K., Tsami, L., Lerman, D., Berg, W., Lindgren, S., Connelly, M., & Wacker, D. (2024). A comparative effectiveness trial of functional behavioral assessment methods. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 57(1), 166-183. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1045
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (Second edition). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Đorđević, M., Brojčin B., i Glumbić, N. (2019). Multikomponentne bihevioralne intervencije u specijalnoj edukaciji. Univerzitet u Beogradu ‒ Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju: Izdavački centar (ICF).
Dučić, B., i Kaljača, S. (2011). Primena funkcionalnog komunikacionog treninga u tretmanu problematičnog ponašanja dece sa autizmom. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 10(4), 705‒723.
Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. (1992). The Motivation Assessment Scale. Topeka, KS: Monaco and Associates.
Emerson, E., Kiernan, C., Alborz, A., Reeves, D., Mason, H., Swarbrick, R., Mason, L., & Hatton, C. (2001). The prevalence of challenging behaviors: a total population study. Research in developmental disabilities, 22(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-4222(00)00061-5
Fekonja Peklaj, U. (2013). Opazovanje kot metoda raziskovanja v razvojni psihologiji. In Lj. Marjanovič Umek & M. Zupančič (Ed.), Razvojna psihologija: Izbrane teme (str. 7-21). Univerza v Ljubljani: Filozofska fakulteta. https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/si/sl/bib/ul/47007586
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., & Roane, H. S. (2011). Handbook of Applied Behavior Analysis. The Guilford Presss.
Floyd, R. G., Phaneuf, R. L., & Wilczynski, S. M. (2005). Measurement Properties of Indirect Assessment Methods for Functional Behavioral Assessment: A Review of Research. School Psychology Review, 34(1), 58-73.
Glumbić, N., Brojčin, B., i Đorđević, M. (2018). Specijalna edukacija zasnovana na dokazima: bihevioralne tehnike. Univerzitet u Beogradu ‒ Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju Izdavački centar (ICF).
Hadaway, S. M., & Brue, A. W. (2016). Practitioners's Guide to Functional Behavioral Assessment: Process, Purpose, Planning, and Prevention. New York: Springer.
Hall S. S. (2005). Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors. Research in developmental disabilities, 26(6), 514-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.004
Johnston, S. S., & O’Neill, R. E. (2001). Searching for Effectiveness and Efficiency in Conducting Functional Assessments: A Review and Proposed Process for Teachers and Other Practitioners. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(4), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760101600402
Jurišić, D. B. (2023). Ocena funkcije vedenja in program podpore. Center Janeza Levca Ljubljana: Izobraževalni center Pika.
Kodrič, J. & Jurišić, D. B. (2014). Načrtovanje spreminjanja motečega vedenja. In B. D. Jurišič & J. Kodrič (Ed.), Podpora pozitivnemu vedenju (str. 43-56). Ljubljana: Društvo Down sindrom. http://www.downov-sindrom.si/prenosi/7-strokovni-posvet.pdf
Lewis, T. J., Mitchell, B. S., Harvey, K., Green, A., & Mckenzie, J. (2015). A Comparison of Functional Behavioral Assessment and Functional Analysis Methodology among Students with Mild Disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 41(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-41.1.5
Lundqvist L. O. (2013). Prevalence and risk markers of behavior problems among adults with intellectual disabilities: a total population study in Örebro County, Sweden. Research in developmental disabilities, 34(4), 1346-1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.010
Marković, D. i Kaljača, S. (2017). Samopovređivanje osoba sa težim oblicima intelektualne ometenosti. Beogradska defektološka škola, 23(2), 51‒70.
Martens, B. K., Baxter, E. L., McComas, J. J., Sallade, S. J., Kester, J. S., Caamano, M., Dimian, A., Simacek, J., & Pennington, B. (2019). Agreement between structured descriptive assessments and functional analyses conducted over a telehealth system. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000153
Matson, J. L., & Williams, L. W. (2014). Functional Assessment of Challenging Behavior. Current Developmental Disorders Reports 1, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-013-0006-y
Mayer, G. R., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Wallace, M. (2019). Behavior Analysis for Lasting Change (Fourth Edition). Sloan Educational Publishing, LLC.
Mayton, M. R., Carter, S. L., & Wheeler, J. J. (2014). Intrusiveness of behavioral treatments for adults with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.023
Neitzel, J., & Bogin, J. (2008). Steps for implementation: Functional behavior assessment. North Carolina: Chapel Hill, NC.
O'Brien G. (2003). The classification of problem behaviour in Diagnostic Criteria for Psychiatric Disorders for Use with Adults with Learning Disabilities/Mental Retardation (DC-LD). Journal of intellectual disability research, 47(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.47.s1.39.x
O'Dwyer, C., McCallion, P., Burke, É., Carroll, R., O'Dwyer, M., & McCarron, M. (2018). Prevalence and associated factors of problem behaviours among older adults with intellectual disabilities in Ireland. Research in developmental disabilities - 80, 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.007
Ogg-Groenendaal, M., Hermans, H., & Claessens, B. (2014). A systematic review on the effect of exercise interventions on challenging behavior for people with intellectual disabilities. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(7), 1507-1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.003
Oliver, A. C., Pratt, L. A., & Normand, M. P. (2015). A survey of functional behavior assessment methods used by behavior analysts in practice. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(4), 817-829. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.256
Ollington N. (2016). Comparison of a direct and an indirect approach for the functional assessment of insistence on sameness in a child with autism spectrum disorder and a typically developing child. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 19(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2014.898161
O'Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment for problem behavior: A practical handbook (Second Edition). Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Paclawskyj, T. R., Kurtz, P. F., & O'Connor, J. T. (2004). Functional assessment of problem behaviors in adults with mental retardation. Behavior modification, 28(5), 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445503259834
Pulec Lah S., & Janjušević P. (2011). Funkcionalna ocena vedenja. In L. Magajna & M. Velikonja (Ed.), Učenci z učnimi težavami - Prepoznavanje in diagnostično ocenjevanje (str. 57-71). Pedagoška fakultata v Ljubljani, Ljubljana. http://www.ucne-tezave.si/files/2016/10/2_Prepoznavanje.pdf
Romani, P. W., Luehring, M. C., Hays, T. M., & Boorse, A. L. (2022). Comparisons of functional behavior assessment procedures to the functional analysis of problem behavior. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000258
Rooker, G. W., DeLeon, I. G., Borrero, C. S., Frank-Crawford, M. A., & Roscoe, E. M. (2015). Reducing ambiguity in the functional assessment of problem behavior. Behavioral interventions: theory & practice in residential & community-based clinical programs, 30(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1400
Snyder, S. K. (2023). A comparison of outcomes of indirect, direct and functional analysis assessment methods and implications for classroom-based treatment for challenging behavior [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia]. UGA Open Scholar. https://9949574623902959 - Search Results - UGA Open Scholar
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., Scott, T., Liaupsin, C., Sailor, W., Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R. III, Wickham, D., Wilcox, B., & Ruef, M. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(3), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070000200302
Tarbox, J., Wilke, A. E., Najdowski, A. C., Findel-Pyles, R. S., Balasanyan, S., Caveney, A. C., Chilingaryan, V., King, D. M., Niehoff, S. M., Slease, K., & Tia, B. (2009). Comparing indirect, descriptive, and experimental functional assessments of challenging behavior in children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21(6), 493-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-009-9154-8
Thompson, R. H., & Iwata, B. A. (2007). A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior. Journal of applied behavior analysis- 40(2), 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.56-06
Vogrinc, J. (2008). Kvalitativno raziskovanje na pedagoškem področju. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35123064.pdf
Copyright (c) 2025 Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.