Faktori koji utiču na primenu augmentativne i alternativne komunikacije
Abstract
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) includes various methods, strategies, and techniques as well as devices and means developed with the aim of imroving the communication competence of people with speech and language disorders. AAC intervention implies a carefully planned process of selection and implementation of AAC means, as well as a precise definition of outcomes and methods of their evaluation to improve an indiidual’s participation in the communication process. This paper aims to point out factors (personal and environmental) which potentially represent facilitators or barriers that influence the application of augmentative and alternative communication. Personal factors of importance include the user’s individual characteristics, ability and skill set, personality traits and motivation, as well as personal preferences. The environmental factors include physical and cultural environment, socioeconomic status, knowledge, information and attitudes of the environment, experts’ competence, and technology-related factors. Reported factors must be taken into account when implementing the AAK intervention as an effective support strategy for people with severe forms of speech and language disorders.
References
Arsenić, I., Jovanović Simić, N., & Daničić, Z. (2022). Primena asistivne tehnologije za komunikaciju u edukaciji učenika sa smetnjama u razvoju - samoprocena nastavnog osoblja. Nastava i vaspitanje, 71(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2202267A
Atanga, C., Jones, B.A., Krueger, L.E., & Lu, S. (2020). Teachers of students with learning disabilities: assistive technology knowledge, perceptions, interests, and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35, 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0162643419864858
Babb, S., McNaughton, D., Light, J., Caron, J., Wydner, K., & Jung, S. (2020). Using AAC video visual scene displays to increase participation and communication within a volunteer activity for adolescents with complex communication needs. Augmentative and alternative communication, 36(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020. 1737966
Bailey, R. L., Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2006/006)
Beukelman, D. R., & Light, J. C. (2020). Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Beukelman, D. R., Thiessen, A., & Fager, S. K. (2021). Personalization of visual scene displays: preliminary investigations of adults with aphasia, typical females across the age-span, and young adult males and females. Topics in language disorders, 41(3), e1–e11.
Broomfield, K., Harrop, D., Jones, G. L., Sage, K., & Judge, S. (2022). A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961
Clarke, M., Price, K., & Griffiths, T. (2016). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with cerebral palsy. Paediatrics and Child Health, 26(9), 373-377. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.paed.2016.04.012
Connolly, A., Bailey, S., Lamont, R., & Tu, A. (2023). Factors associated with assistive technology prescription and acceptance in motor neurone disease. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023. 2272858
Cooper, L., Balandin, S., Trembath, D. (2009). The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(3), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 07434610903036785
Corallo, F., Bonanno, L., Lo Buono, V., De Salvo, S., Rifici, C., Pollicino, P., Allone, C., Palmeri, R., Todaro, A., Alagna, A., Bramanti, A., Bramanti, P., & Marino, S. (2017). Augmentative and alternative communication effects on quality of life in patients with Locked-in syndrome and their caregivers. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases, 26(9), 1929–1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017. 06.026
Crowe, B., Machalicek, W., Wei, Q., Drew, C., & Ganz, J. (2022). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with intellectual and developmental disability: amega-review of the literature. Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 34(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-021-09790-0
Dada, S., Flores, C., Bastable, K., & Schlosser, R. W. (2021). The effects of augmentative and alternative communication interventions on the receptive language skills of children with developmental disabilities: A scoping review. International journal of speech-language pathology, 23(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2020.1797165
Dietz, A., Wallace, S. E., & Weissling, K. (2020). Revisiting the role of augmentative and alternative communication in aphasia rehabilitation. American journal of speech-language pathology, 29(2), 909–913. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00041
Fager, S. K., & Burnfield, J. M. (2014). Patients' experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 9(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/ 10.3109/17483107.2013.787124
Fannin, D.K. (2016). The intersection of culture and ICF-CY personal and environmental factors for alternative and augmentative communication. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(12), 63-82.
Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Heath, A. K., Parker, R. I., Rispoli, M. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 42(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10803-011-1212-2
Ganz, J. B., Mason, R. A., Goodwyn, F. D., Boles, M. B., Heath, A. K., & Davis, J. L. (2014). Interaction of participant characteristics and type of AAC with individuals with ASD: a meta-analysis. American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 119(6), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-119.6.516
Gilroy, S. P., McCleery, J. P., & Leader, G. (2023). A delayed intervention start randomized controlled trial of high- and low-tech communication training approaches for school-age autistic children with co-occurring intellectual disability. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 56(3), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.989
Gormley, J., & Fager, S. K. (2021). Personalization of patient-provider communication across the lifespan. Topics in language disorders, 41(3), 249–268.
Gormley, J., & Light, J. (2019). Providing services to individuals with complex communication needs in the inpatient rehabilitation setting: the experiences and perspectives of speech-language pathologists. American journal of speech-language pathology, 28(2), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0076
Holyfield, C., Caron, J., & Light, J. (2019). Programing AAC just-in-time for beginning communicators: the process. Augmentative and alternative communication, 35(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2019.1686538
Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and alternative communication, 22(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500483588
Judge, S., & Townend, G. (2013). Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids. International journal of language & communication disorders, 48(4), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12012
Kane, S.K., Morris, M.R., Paradiso, A., & Campbell, J. (2017). "At times avuncular and cantankerous, with the reflexes of a mongoose": understanding self-expression through augmentative and alternative communication devices. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 1166–1179). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998284
Karhula, M., Saukkonen, S., Xiong, E., Kinnunen, A., Heiskanen, T., & Anttila, H. (2021). ICF personal factors strengthen commitment to person-centered rehabilitation - a scoping review. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2, 709682. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fresc.2021.709682
King, M. R., & Soto, G. (2022). Code-switching using aided AAC: toward an integrated theoretical framework. Augmentative and alternative communication, 38(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2022.2051603
Kleinert, H. L. (2019). Students with the most significant disabilities, communicative competence, and the full extent of their exclusion. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919892740
Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and alternative communication, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
Lund, S. K., Quach, W., Weissling, K., McKelvey, M., & Dietz, A. (2017). Assessment with children who need augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): clinical decisions of AAC apecialists. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 48(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0086
Lund, S.K., Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part III – contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02656730701189123
Maresca, G., Pranio, F., Naro, A., De Luca, R., Maggio, M. G., Scarcella, I., De Domenico, C., Bramanti, P., Conti Nibali, V., Portaro, S., & Calabrò, R. S. (2019). Augmentative and alternative communication improves quality of life in the early stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Functional neurology, 34(1), 35–43.
McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M., Light, J. (2008). ‘‘A child needs to be given a chance to succeed’’: parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 07434610701421007
Mitra, S., & Shakespeare, T. (2019). Remodeling the ICF. Disability and health journal, 12(3), 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.01.008
Moorcroft, A., Scarinci, N., & Meyer, C. (2019). A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families. Disability and rehabilitation, assistive technology, 14(7), 710–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1499135
Moorcroft, A., Scarinci, N., & Meyer, C. (2020). 'We were just kind of handed it and then it was smoke bombed by everyone': How do external stakeholders contribute to parent rejection and the abandonment of AAC systems? International journal of language & communication disorders, 55(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12502
Müller, R., & Geyh, S. (2015). Lessons learned from different approaches towards classifying personal factors. Disability and rehabilitation, 37(5), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.3109/ 09638288.2014.923527
Nguyen, T., Stewart, D., Rosenbaum, P., Baptiste, S., Kraus de Camargo, O., & Gorter, J. W. (2018). Using the ICF in transition research and practice? Lessons from a scoping review. Research in developmental disabilities, 72, 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ridd.2017.11.003
Nornburn, K., Levn, A., Morgan, S., Harding, C. (2016). A survey of augmentative and alternative communication used in an inner city special school. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 43(3), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12142
O'Neill, T., Light, J., & Pope, L. (2018). Effects of interventions that include aided augmentative and alternative communication input on the communication of individuals with complex communication needs: ameta-analysis. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 61(7), 1743–1765. https://doi.org/10.1044/ 2018_JSLHR-L-17-0132
Pampoulou, E., Fuller, D. R. (2020). Exploring AAC graphic symbol choices: a preliminary study. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 14(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-03-2020-0013
Parette, H., Brotherson, M. and Huer, M. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(2): 177-190.
Puaschitz, N. G., Jacobsen, F. F., Mannseth, J., Angeles, R. C., Berge, L. I., Gedde, M. H., & Husebo, B. S. (2021). Factors associated with access to assistive technology and telecare in home-dwelling people with dementia: baseline data from the LIVE@Home.Path trial. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 21(1), 264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01627-2
Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M., D’Silva, K. (2005). ‘When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff’: the challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3): 165–-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500140360
Reichle, J., Simacek, J., Wattanawongwan, S., & Ganz, J. (2019). Implementing aided augmentative communication systems with persons having complex communicative needs. Behavior modification, 43(6), 841–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455198 58272
Richardson, L., McCoy, A., & McNaughton, D. (2019). "He's worth the extra work": The employment experiences of adults with ASD who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as reported by adults with ASD, family members, and employers. Work, 62(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-192856
Ripat, J., Verdonck, M., Gacek, C., & McNicol, S. (2019). A qualitative metasynthesis of the meaning of speech-generating devices for people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(2), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 07434618.2018.1513071
Romano, N., Yu Shon Chun, R. (2018). Augmentative and alternative communication use: family and professionals’ perceptions of facilitators and barriers. Codas, 30(4), e20170138. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162017138
Romsky, M., Sevcik, R.A. (2005) Augmentative communication and early intervention Myths and realities. Infants & Young Children, 18(3), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.1097/ 00001163-200507000-00002
Sievers, S. B., Trembath, D., & Westerveld, M. (2018). A systematic review of predictors, moderators, and mediators of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and alternative communication, 34(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1462849
Sievers, S. B., Trembath, D., & Westerveld, M. F. (2020). Speech-language pathologists' knowledge and consideration of factors that may predict, moderate, and mediate AAC outcomes. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 50(1), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04217-4
Smith, D. W., Kelley, P., Maushak, N. J., Griffin-Shirley, N., Lan, W. Y. (2009). Assistive technology competencies for teachers of students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(8), 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0145482X0910300804
Smith, M., Connolly, I. (2008). Roles of aided communication: perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disability & Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 3(5): 260-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100802338499
Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt, P., Goetz, L. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: an educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(2), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/ aac.17.2.62.72
Swan, K., Hopper, M., Wenke, R., Jackson, C., Till, T., & Conway, E. (2018). Speech-language pathologist interventions for communication in moderate-severe dementia: a systematic review. American journal of speech-language pathology, 27(2), 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-17-0043
Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D. (2019). Learning styles and motivations of individuals without prior exposure to augmentative and alternative communication. Topics in language disorders, 39(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000167
Thiessen, A., Brown, J., Freeland, T., & Brewer, C. H. (2019). Identification and expression of themes depicted in visual scene and grid displays by adults with traumatic brain injury. American journal of speech-language pathology, 28(2), 664–675. https://doi.org/ 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0086
Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2015). Building evidence-based practice in AAC display design for young children: current practices and future directions. Augmentative and alternative communication, 31(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618. 2015.1035798
Tsai M. J. (2016). Revisiting communicative competence in augmentative and alternative communication. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica, 68(5), 222–231. https://doi.org/ 10.1159/000475816
Tsai, M. J. (2018). Augmentative and alternative communication service by speech–Language pathologists in Taiwan. Communication Disorder Quarterly, 40(3): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740118759912
Vollmer Dahlke, D., & Ory, M. G. (2020). Emerging issues of intelligent assistive technology use among people with dementia and their caregivers: a U.S. perspective. Frontiers in public health, 8, 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00191
Webb, E. J. D., Lynch, Y., Meads, D., Judge, S., Randall, N., Goldbart, J., Meredith, S., Moulam, L., Hess, S., & Murray, J. (2019). Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment. BMJ open, 9(11), e030274. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2019-030274
Webb, E. J. D., Meads, D., Lynch, Y., Randall, N., Judge, S., Goldbart, J., Meredith, S., Moulam, L., Hess, S., & Murray, J. (2019). What's important in AAC decision making for children? Evidence from a best-worst scaling survey. Augmentative and alternative communication, 35(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1561750
World Health Organization (2001a). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/ international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
Wormanes, S., Malek, Y. (2004). Egyptian speech therapists want more knowledge about augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 20(1): 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610310001629571
Worms, M. (2018). Factors related to successful implementation of an AAC device for an individual with autism (Doctoral dissertation, Minnesota State University). https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis/4
Yu, F., Mathiason, M. A., Johnson, K., Gaugler, J. E., & Klassen, D. (2019). Memory matters in dementia: efficacy of a mobile reminiscing therapy app. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 5(1), 644–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.002
Copyright (c) 2024 Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.