Justification of military neutrality of the Republic of Serbia at a time of erosion of neutrality in Europe
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the justifiableness of the Republic of Serbia’s politics of military neutrality after the beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, i.e., in an era of extreme tensions between Western countries and Russia. The significance of this topic has been additionally elevated after two neutral countries, Sweden and Finland, renounced neutrality while debates about the appropriateness of neutrality emerged in other neutral countries, such are Ireland, Malta, and Austria. The purpose of the paper is to examine, from a perspective of sociology of politics, whether the position of military neutrality still represents a good foreign-policy strategy aiming to preserve sovereignty and territorial integrity. The hypothesis of this paper is that Serbia’s military neutrality is justified by the social reality in Serbia.
The first chapter briefly describes the historical decline of neutrality during the first half of the 20th century. In that context, observation made in mid last century, according to which neutrality was becoming an obsolete concept, is true. Increase of NATO members, as well as abandoning neutrality under the influence of globalization and negative experiences of neutral countries in the 20th century, strengthens this assertion. However, we can conclude that neutrality has existed in continuity in Europe throughout the entire modern period of history, and that there were always some states that chose neutrality, with larger or lesser prospects of success in realization of their security interests. The great revolution, one might say the collapse of neutrality or even a frenzy to align, was the result of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict and new increasing tensions between the West and Russia.
The second chapter is dedicated to the causes of Serbia’s decision to be military neutral. These causes include: internal division of key political acters in regards to strategic alignment, the issues of the status of Kosovo and Metohija in which the Russian Federation provides key support to Republic of Serbia in the United Nations, and the role of NATO in wars during the disintegration of Yugoslavia and currently in Kosovo and Metohija.
The third chapter lists the advantages in regards to social values implied by the position of military neutrality. Authors conclude that military neutrality represents a favorable strategic option for the Republic of Serbia, not just due to painful collective memory of Serbian citizens of the NATO aggression on Yugoslavia and the support of the Russian Federation to Serbia in regards to Kosovo and Metohija, but also due to the intrinsic values of neutrality which could become an identity attribute and a foundation of the renewal of solidarity in Serbian society.
References
Bauman, Zigmunt. 2009. Fluidni život. Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.
Blagojević, Veljko. 2016. „Potencijal vojne neutralnosti Republike Srbije u savremenim međunarodnim odnosimaˮ. U Uticaj vojne neutralnosti Srbije na bezbednost i stabilnost u Evropi, ur. Srđan Korać, 240–258. Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu i Hanns Seidel Stiftung.
Blagojević, Veljko. 2022. „Strateško promišljanje vojne neutralnosti Srbije: mogućnosti, izazovi i riziciˮ. Srpska politička misao, posebno izdanje 2022: 123–146. doi: 10.22182/spm.specijal2022.5
Briffa, Hillary. 2023. „Maltese Neutrality: A Live Debateˮ. Neutrality Studies https://neutralitystudies.com/2023/08/maltese-neutrality-a-live-debate. August 3 2023.
Costamagna, Christian. 2023. „War in Ukraine as a long-term efect of NATO intervention against Yugoslavia? An overview”. Sociološki pregled, LVII (2): 541–561. doi: 10.5937/socpreg57-42985
Cvijić, Jovan. 1987. Sabrana dela, knjiga dva, Balkansko poluostrvo. Beograd: SANU, Književne novine, Zavod za udžbenike.
Czarny, Roman, and Krzysztof Kubiak. 2022. „Total Defence in a consumer society: a real possibility or wishful thinking? The case study of Swedenˮ. Security, theory and practice 48 (3): 63–74. doi: 10.48269/2451-0718-btip-2022-3-004.
Čupić, Čedomir. 2002. Politika i poziv. Beograd: Udruženje za političke nauke Jugoslavije, Čigoja štampa.
Dvorniković, Vladimir. 1996. Psiha jugoslovenske melanholije. Beograd: Tersit –Signature.
Đorđević, Tihomir. 1984. Naš narodni život, tom 4. Beograd: Prosveta.
Forca, Božidar. 2022. „Vojna neutrlnost Republike Srbije kao racionalno i prelazno rešenje”. Srpska politička misao, posebno izdanje, 147–188. doi: 10.22182/spm.specijal2022.6.
Gaćinović, Radoslav. 2018. „Vojna neutralnost i budućnost Srbije”. Politika nacionalne bezbednosti, 14 (1): 23–38. doi: 10.22182/pnb.1412018.2
Gajić, Aleksandar. 2023. „Geopolitički položaj Srbije nakon otpočinjanja rata u Ukrajini: neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje u kriznom kontekstu”. Srpska politička misao 80 (2), 53–74. doi: 10.5937/spm80-44267.
Galea, Albert. 2022. „Malta and neutrality: The story behind Malta’s main foreign policy pillarˮ. Malta Independent online. https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2022-05-15/local-news/Malta-and-neutrality-The-story-behind-Malta-s-main-foreign-policy-pillar-6736242955
Gidens, Entoni. 2001. Sociologija. Podgorica: CID.
Gordić, Miodrag, i Ivan Petrović. (2019). „Model vojne neutralnosti kao razvojna perspektiva Republike Srbijeˮ. Baština (47): 117-134.
Greminger, Thomas, and Jean-Marc Rickli. 2023. „Neutrality After the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. The Example of Switzerland and Some Lessons for Ukraineˮ. PRISM 10 (3): 27–43.
Igrutinović, Milan. 2022. „Strah i ambicija: Srbija, vojna neutralnost i prošireno odvraćanjeˮ. U Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje, ur. Veljko Blagojević, 39–56. Beograd: MC „Odbrana”.
Kastels, Manuel. 2018. Uspon umreženog društva. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Kastels, Manuel. 2022. Sunovrat. Kriza liberalne demokratije. Beograd: Clio.
Keatinge, Patrick. 2022. European Neutrals, then and now. Dublin: The Institute of International and European Affairs.
Knežević, Miloš. 2022. „Mogućnosti i perspective vojne neutralnosti Srbije – suverenizam i neutralizam pred izazovima multipolarizovanjaˮ. U Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje, ur. Veljko Blagojević, 141–188. Beograd: MC „Odbrana”.
Kremer, Uli. 2000. Novi NATO – novi ratovi. Beograd: Filip Višnjić.
Menon, Rajan, and William Ruger. 2020. „NATO enlargement and US grand strategy: a net assessment”. International Politics 57: 371–400. doi: 10.1057/s41311-020-00235-7
Michel, Leo G. 2011. „Finland, Sweden, and NATO: From 'Virtual' to Formal Allies?ˮ Strategic Forum 265: 1–20.
Milenković, Miloš. 2019. „Prilog određenju političkih činilaca strateške kulture”. Vojno delo 71 (8), 52–72. doi: 10.5937/vojdelo1908052M.
Mitić, Aleksandar i Petar Matić. 2022. „Strateški okviri osporavanja vojne neutralnosti Srbijeˮ. Srpska politička misao, posebno izdanje 2022: 245–266, doi: 10.22182/spm.specijal2022-9
Nedeljković, Draga. 1997. Traženje dobra u nedoba. Banja Luka, beograd: Zadužbina Petar Kočić.
Nielsen, Mete Kjuel. 2013. „Kako Zapad vidi neutralnost Srbijeˮ. U ur. Igor Novaković, Neutralnost u XXI veku, pouke za Srbiju, 17–18. Beograd: ISAC Fond, Centar za međunarodne i bezbednosne poslove.
Pečujlić, Miroslav. 2002. Globalizacija, dva lika sveta. Beograd: Gutembergova galaksija.
Sartori, Đovani. 2001. Demokratija – šta je to? Podgorica: CID.
Scheidler, Fabian. 2023. „Austria: neutral for how much longer?ˮ Le Monde diplomatique. https://mondediplo.com/2023/09/07austrian.
Simony, Andras. 2017. „Finland, Sweden and NATO: a view from Washingtonˮ. In Finland, Sweden and NATO. Did Trump Change Everything?, ed. Jaan Siitonen, 83–95. Karis: The European Liberal Forum.
Starčević, Srđan, i Srđan Blagojević. 2019. „Odnos srpskog društvenog karaktera i vojne neutralnostiˮ. Vojno delo 71 (8), 256–272. doi: 10.5937/vojdelo1908256S.
Starčević, Srđan, i Srđan Blagojević. 2021. „Autonomija vojne profesije kao uslov civilne demokratske kontrole vojske i ostvarivanja osnovne društvene uloge vojske”. Vojno delo 73 (3), 121–133. doi: 10.5937/vojdelo2103121S.
Starčević, Srđan, i Srđan Blagojević. 2022. „Profesionalna vojska u neutralnim državama i društvena potreba za zaštitomˮ. U Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje, ur. Veljko Blagojević, 209–227. Beograd: MC „Odbrana”.
Starčević, Srđan, i Srđan Blagojević. 2023. „Služenje vojnog roka kao deo društvenog ideala u Srbijiˮ. Srpska politička misao 80 (2): 33–51. doi: 10.5937/spm80-44254.
Starčević, Srđan. 2007. „’Partnerstvo za mir’ i globalizacija“. Vojno delo, LVIII (1): 60–86.
Starčević, Srđan. 2007. „’Partnerstvo za mir’ i globalizacija”. Vojno delo, 59 (1), 60–86.
Stepić, Milomir. 2022. „Celishodnost vojne neutralnosti Srbije kao instrumenta strateškog odvraćanja u kontekstu globalnih geopolitičkih trendova”. U Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje, ur. Veljko Blagojević, 99–116. Beograd: MC „Odbrana”.
Šušnjić, Đuro. 2015. Teorije kulture. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
Torvalds, Nils. 2017. „Summary: EU, Finland and Sweden. Maybe NATO in the future?ˮ. In Finland, Sweden and NATO. Did Trump Change Everything?, ed. Jaan Siitonen, 97–103. Karis: The European Liberal Forum.
Webber, Jude. 2023. „Ireland opens debate on future of military neutralityˮ. Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/67279122-7cf4-41ad-bc98-24fe8a51538f, May 18 2023.
