UNKNOWN ISSUES OF DIGITALIZING THE TAX DOMAIN
Abstract
The application of digital technologies in the tax domain represents a confirmation of modernization and the turning point in the development of the state’s tax function. Digitalization establishes a new paradigm of managing the tax system and significantly changes the tax‒political reality. The potential of digital technologies is expressively transformative for proceedings of tax relation subjects and offers numerous possibilities for advancing the implementation of taxes and protection of the state’s fiscal interest. The alterations brought about by digital technologies affect tax relations and the perception of the taxation phenomenon in the tax public opinion. The resulting digital innovations of the organization and business model of tax administration generate prerequisites for basic modification of tax procedures and taxpayers’ behaviour in relation to tax compliance. Since the process of digitalizing the tax domain is complex and it seeks to raise taxation to a significantly higher level of development, it is necessary to timely discern, understand, and accept the advantages of this process, but also the accompanying difficulties and challenges, in order to adequately treat them. Digitalization of the taxation domain facilitates the work of tax authorities and compliance with tax regulations, strengthens the state’s digital tax power, empowers the function of tax control of taxpayers, digitally and technologically shapes the tax reality, and gradually paves the “path” for a wider and deeper presence of tax authority in the taxpayer’s life and business. By glorifying the positive points of digitalizing the tax domain and by expecting taxpayers to accept the projected digital‒technological novelties in the tax sphere and to model the existing ways of fulfilling tax obligations, the need for a more comprehensive examination of the reverse side of tax digital novelties, the perception of unknown issues and a more subtle analysis of the uncertainty of their impact on our contemporary tax society and accepted democratic principles and social values, have generally been marginalized. More daring digressions from the discourse of the inevitability of digitalizing taxation which has become almost monopolistically established in numerous countries of the world are less represented, despite the well‒known fact that with the increase of digital capacity, the tax domain becomes more exposed to risks. Superficial and uncritical adherence to digital‒technological trends initiates a series of serious socio-ethical dilemmas in the tax area, which will most certainly be resolved only in the coming years. In the meantime, in circumstances in which the realization of extensive and substantive legal regulation of the use of digital achievements is incomparably slower than the dynamics of their creation for application in administering taxes, the position of taxpayers in the tax procedure will change significantly. The crucial question is whether taxpayers will accept this state of affairs with complete confidence in tax authorities or with an explicit prior request for a more detailed explanation of the effect of digital‒technological changes, as a condition for accepting the remodelling of traditional tax relations and avoiding potential misunderstandings, uncertainties and problems.
References
Branković, Srbobran. 2017. „Veštačka inteligencija i društvo.” Srspka politička misao 56 (2): 13‒32.
Subotić, Oliver. 2011. Informaciono kontrolisano društvo. Beograd: Bernar.
Subotić, Oliver. 2023a. Digitalni izazov: putevi hrišćanstva u civilizaciji binarnog koda. Beograd: Catena mundi.
Subotić, Oliver. 2023b. Digitalni rubikon: o putu neizvesnosti popločanom veštačkom inteligencijom. Beograd: Catena mundi.
Adams, Charles W. 2006. Za dobro i zlo: utjecaj poreza na kretanje civilizacije. Zagreb: Institut za javne financije.
Bentley, Duncan. 2020. “Digital tax administration: transforming the workforce to deliver.” eJournal of Tax Research 18 (2): 353‒381.
Bezklubaya, Svetlana A. 2023. “Human and ethical risks of digitalization.” Nova prisutnost 21 (3): 607‒623. doi: 10.31192/np.21.3.8.
Boban, Marija. 2012. ,,Pravo na privatnost i pravo na pristup informacijama u suvremenom informacijskom društvu.” Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 49 (3): 575‒598.
Chen, Jingnan (Cecilia), Shaun Grimshaw, and Gareth D. Myles. 2017. “Testing and Implementing Digital Tax Administration.” In Digital revolutions in public finance, eds. Sanjeev Gupta, Michael Keen, Alpa Shah and Geneviève Verdier, 113‒145. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Gasmi, Gordana, i Dragan Prlja. 2021. „Ugrožavanje ljudskih prava i veštačka inteligencija.” U Primena prava i pravna sigurnost, ur. Jelena S. Perović Vujačić, 323‒335. Beograd: Kopaonička škola prirodnog prava‒Slobodan Perović
Granger, Jennie, Bernadene de Clercq, and Andy Lymer. 2023. “Digital Disruption and Revenue Administration Responses.” In Taxation in the Digital Economy: New Models in Asia and the Pacific, eds. Nella Hendriyetty, Chris Evans, Chul Ju Kim, and Farhad Taghizadeh‒Hesary, 21‒44. New York: Asian Development Bank Institute and Routledge.
Jacobs, Bas. 2017. “Digitalization and taxation.” In Digital revolutions in public finance, eds. Sanjeev Gupta, Michael Keen, Alpa Shah and Geneviève Verdier, 25‒55. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Krieger, Tina. 2021. “A Model‒Theoretical Analysis for Digital Tax Administrations.” International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy 2 (34): 1‒12. doi: 10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30062021/7543.
Nasrulla, Tilabov. 2022. “Prospects for the use of digital technologies in securing tax revenues.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems (ICFNDS ’22), 60‒65. Tashkent, TAS, Uzbekistan. doi: 10.1145/3584202.3584212.
Night, Sadress, and Juma Bananuka. 2020. “The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance.” Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science 25 (49): 73‒88. doi: 10.1108/JEFAS-07-2018-0066.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD] 2019. Tax Administration 2019: Comparative Information on OECD and other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/74d162b6-en.
Scarcella, Luisa. 2019. “Tax compliance and privacy rights in profiling and automated decision making.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1‒19. doi: 10.14763/2019.4.1422.
Shakil, Mohammad Hassan, and Mashiyat Tasnia. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence and Tax Administration in Asia and the Pacific.” In Taxation in the Digital Economy: New Models in Asia and the Pacific, eds. Nella Hendriyetty, Chris Evans, Chul Ju Kim, and Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 45‒55. New York: Asian Development Bank Institute and Routledge.
Strango, Cristina. 2021. “Does digitalisation in public services reduce tax evasion?” Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper 106856: 1‒16. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106856/.
Vissaro, Denny. 2023. “Developing a Cooperative Compliance Model for Developing Economies: Justifcation, Prerequisites, and Administrative Design.” In Taxation in the Digital Economy: New Models in Asia and the Pacific, eds. Nella Hendriyetty, Chris Evans, Chul Ju Kim, and Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 82‒105. New York: Asian Development Bank Institute and Routledge.
Yamen, Ahmed, Ali Coskun, and Hounaida Mersni. 2023. “Digitalization and tax evasion: the moderation effect of corruption.” Economic Research‒Ekonomska Istraživanja 36 (2): 1‒24. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2142634.
