THE DEFENSE FUNCTION OF THE STATE – TRADITIONAL AND MODERN UNDERSTANDING
Abstract
To understand a phenomenon means to grasp its essence, that is, all the characteristics that define it and distinguish it from other phenomena. Since the defense function of the state is a complex phenomenon encompassing biological, anthropological, philosophical, sociological, psychological, political, security, military, strategic, and other aspects, understanding its essence is no easy task. It requires a multidisciplinary approach and the application of concepts such as man, society, state, values, interests, power, politics, and strategy. The starting point in understanding its essence is undoubtedly the individual, given that instinctual needs for survival and security drive human nature. Since the origin and functioning of a political community are rooted in these human needs, the defense function of the state can be further clarified through an analogy with the same function in individuals. By applying this analogy, it can be concluded that defense belongs to the state’s protective functions category. It differs from other functions of this type in that it is aimed at safeguarding the survival and vital values of the state from violent threats, and its protective action is also inherently violent. For this reason, until recently, the defense function of the state was equated with the military function. In recent decades, however, there has been a shift from the traditional military-centric understanding of the state’s defense function due to the growing significance of non-military threats to its survival and vital values. This has led to changes in the state’s defense operations and, consequently, to a transformation in the essence of its defense function. While the object of the state's defense remains the same, its survival and vital values, the changes in the essence of its defense function emerge from the dialectical relationship between defense and attack. Therefore, the modern defense function of the state can be understood as a protective function by which the state, through the use of military and non–military instruments of national power in both peace and war, protects its survival and vital values from various military and non-military threats.
References
Aćimović, Ljubivoje. 1987. Nauka o međunarodnim odnosima: teorije i istraživački pravci. Beograd: Naučna knjiga.
Bodin, Milenko. 2007. Teorijski osnovi menadžmenta nacionalne bezbednosti. Doktorska disertacija. Beograd: Fakultet bezbednosti.
Despotović, Miomir. 2000. Igra potreba: Andragoške varijacije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju.
Dugin, Aleksandar. 2004. Osnovi geopolitike: Geopolitička budućnost Rusije. Zrenjanin: Ekopres.
Finkel, Evgeny, and Yitzhak M. Brudny. 2012. “No more colour! Authoritarian regimes and colour revolutions in Eurasia,” Democratization 19 (1): 1–14. DOI:10.1080/13510347.2012.641298.
Fukujama, Frenisis. 2002. Kraj istorije i poslednji čovek. Podgorica: CID.
Gray, Colin S. 2007. War, Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to The Strategic History. London and New York: Routledge.
Grupa autora. 1973. Vojna enciklopedija, Drugo izdanje, Knjiga 6. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački zavod.
Hantington, Semjuel. 2000. Sukob civilizacija i preoblikovanje svetskog poretka. Podgorica i Banja Luka: CID i Romanov.
Hol, Kelvin S., i Gardner Lindzi. 1983. Teorije ličnosti. Beograd: Nolit.
Hosoe, Nobuhiro. 2023. “The Cost of War: Impact of Sanctions on Russia following the Invasion of Ukraine.” Journal of Policy Modeling 45 (2): 305–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.04.001.
Janković, Slobodan. 2013. „Arapsko proleće i mogućnost prekrajanja postojećih granica u arapskom svetu,“ Međunarodna politika LXIV(1152): 74–90.
Jonsson, Oscar and Robert Seely. 2015. “Russian Full–Spectrum Conflict: An Appraisal after Ukraine,” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 28 (1): 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2015.998118.
Jovanović, Slobodan. 1990. Država. Beograd: BIGZ.
Korybko, Andrew. 2015. Hybrid Wars: The Indirect Adaptive Approach to Regime Change, Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.
Kounain, Farhat, Ahmed Saeed Minhas and Ghulam Qumber. 2017. “Independent Kurdish State in Middle East: An Upcoming Epicenter of Middle East Power Politics.” Global Social Sciences Review II (2): 177–189. DOI: 10.31703/gssr.2017(II–II).11.
Lykke, Arthur F. 2001. “Toward an Understanding of Military Strategy.” In U.S. Army War College Guide to Strategy. eds. Joseph R. and Cerami James F. Holcomb, Jr. 179–185. Carlisle: U.S. Army War College.
Mijalković, Saša V. 2011. Nacionalna bezbednost. Drugo, izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd: Kriminalističko–policijska akademija.
Milenković, Miloš R., i Milinko S. Vračar, 2022. „Politička korisnost vojne moći u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima.” Politička revija 71 (1): 157–175. DOI: 10.22182/pr.7112022.8.
Milenković, Miloš R., i Milinko S. Vračar. 2023. „Legitimnost kao faktor ograničenja političke korisnosti vojne moći.” Srpska politička misao 82 (4): 387–405. DOI: 10.5937/spm82–46559.
Milkovski, Vangel, i Sandra Božić. 2023. „Koncept totalne odbrane u strategiji odvraćanja Republike Srbije.” Srpska politička misao 80 (2): 7–32. DOI: 10.5937/spm80–44249.
Miršajmer, Džon. 2017. Tragedija politike velikih sila. Izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
Owens, Mackubin Thomas. 2007. “Strategy and the Strategic Way of Thinking.” Naval War College Review (60): 4, 111–124.
Pajević, Dragan, i Ljubomir Kasagić. 2001. Vojna psihologija. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački zavod.
Popović, Ranko. 1975. Uvod u vojnu psihologiju. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački zavod.
Puljić, Želimir: „Samoostvarene osobe u psihologiji A. H. Maslowa.” Crkva u svijetu 15 (3): 268–276.
Redžić, Saduša F. 2012. „Ličnost, temperament i karakter u teoriji Eriha Froma,“ U Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta XLII (2)/2012. ur. Branko Jovanović. 395–396. Priština: Filozofski fakultet.
Šešić, Bogdan. 1982. Osnovi metodologije društvenih nauka. Treće izdanje. Beograd: Naučna knjiga.
Simeunović, Dragan. 2002. Teorija politike. Rider, I deo. Beograd: Udruženje „Nauka i društvo“.
Simeunović, Dragan. 2009. Uvod u teoriju politike. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
Stajić, Ljubomir. 2006. Osnovi bezbednosti – sa osnovama istraživanja bezbednosnih pojava. Šesto izdanje. Beograd: IK Draganić.
Stepić, Milomir. 2016. Geopolitika: Ideje, teorije, koncepcije. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
Stojanović, Stanislav. 2012. Hobsova teorija ljudske prirode i perspektive mira i poretka. Beograd: Medija centar „Odbrana”.
Stupar, Milorad. 2010. Filozofija politike: Antičko i moderno shvatanje političke zajednice. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, IP Filip Višnjić.
Višnjić, Dušan. 2005. Strategija države kao sudbina nacije. Beograd: Institut ratne veštine.
Vračar, Milinko S., i Milica T. Ćurčić. 2022. „Vojna neutralnost Republike Srbije kao strategijska kategorija.” U „Perspektive vojne neutralnosti Republike Srbije: Između osporovanja i utvrđivanja” ur. Živojin Đurić, posebno izdanje, Srpska politička misao: 41–66. DOI: 10.22182/spm.specijal2022.2.