A CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEBATE ON THE POLICY OF SANCTIONING CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF CHILDREN IN SERBIA: ATTITUDE INCONSISTENCY
Abstract
The policy of introducing a prohibition on corporal punishment of children (CPC) into legal frameworks currently needs unanimous support among social actors in Serbia. This may reflect the instability and inconsistency of collective and individual attitudes toward CPC, which are in the process of changing. The subject of this research is the attitude toward CPC from the standpoint of social change theories and stages of the attitude change process. The aim was to examine the consistency of this attitude across different levels of generality and situational contexts to determine its stability. A quantitative study was conducted among 104 respondents. Data were collected through an online questionnaire designed for the research. The findings revealed that attitude toward CPC depends on situational context differences and the context’s specificity level. For instance, while 79.8% of respondents hold a negative general attitude toward CPC, 54.8% believe that parents should legally be allowed to slap a child on the buttocks with an open hand when the child is disobedient. When presented with five different situations involving specific child misbehavior, only 1.9% to 6.7% of respondents approved of a parent’s reaction involving a mild slap on the buttocks without further explanation, depending on the situation. Conversely, support for this reaction increased to between 7.7% and 31.7% if accompanied by an explanation of why the child’s behaviour was inappropriate. The results of the inconsistency of attitudes toward CPC are discussed in light of the significance of the level of abstraction and situational context. The recommended approach advocates for a policy that respects the particularities of Serbian society by formulating legal provisions on CPC as precisely as possible.
References
Advokatska komora Vojvodine. 2021. „Prednacrt zakona o izmenama i dopunama porodičnog zakona - Tekst propisa.” Advokatska komora Vojvodine. Poslednji pristup 25. septembar 2024. https://akv.org.rs/prednacrt-zakona-izmene-porodicni-zakon/?script=lat.
Cancino-Montecinos, Sebastian, Fredrik Björklund, and Torun Lindholm [Cancino-Montecinos et al.]. 2018. “Dissonance reduction as emotion regulation: Attitude change is related to positive emotions in the induced compliance paradigm.” PLoS ONE 13 (12): e0209012. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209012.
Centola, Damon. 2018. How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cialdini, Robert B., and Noah J. Goldstein. 2004. “Social influence: Compliance and conformity.” Annual Review of Psychology 55 (1): 591–621. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
Chaiken, Shelly, and Yaacov Trope, eds. 1999. Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
de la Sablonniere, Roxane. 2017. “Toward a psychology of social change: A typology of social change.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 397. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00397.
della Porta, Donatella, and Mario Diani. 2006. Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Deutsch, Morton, and Harold Gerard. 1955. “A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51 (3): 629–636. DOI: 10.1037/h0046408.
Eagly, Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Eyal, Tal, Nira Liberman, and Yaacov Trope [Eyal et al.]. 2008. “Judging near and distant virtue and vice.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (4): 1204–1209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012.
Fazio, Russell H., Mark P. Zanna, and Joel Cooper [Fazio et al.]. 1977. “Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each theory’s proper domain of application.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (5): 464–479. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90031-2.
Fazio, Russell H. 1990. “Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23: 75–109. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4.
Fazio, Russell H., and Tamara Towles-Schwen. 1999. “The MODE model of attitude–behavior processes.” In Dual-process theories in social psychology, eds. Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov Trope, 97–116. New York: Guilford Press.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 1991. Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Forgas, Joseph P. 1995. “Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).” Psychological Bulletin 117 (1): 39–66. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39.
Fréchette, Sabrina, and Elisa Romano. 2015. “Change in corporal punishment over time in a representative sample of Canadian parents.” Journal of Family Psychology 29 (4): 507–517. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000104.
Gershoff, Elizabeth T., and Andrew Grogan-Kaylor. 2016. “Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses.” Journal of Family Psychology 30 (4): 453–469. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000191.
Gollwitzer, Peter M. 1999. “Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.” American Psychologist 54 (7): 493–503. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493.
Greenwald, Athony G., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 1995. “Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.” Psychological Review 102 (1): 4–27. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie, and Judson Mills. 1999. Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Lord, Charles G., Mark R. Lepper, and Elizabeth Preston [Lord et al.]. 1984. “Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (6): 1231–1243. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231.
Lord, Charles G., and Mark R. Lepper. 1999. “Attitude representation theory.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Mark P. Zanna, 265–343. San Diego: Academic Press.
Maio, Gregory R., and Geoffrey Haddock. 2010. The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. Tauzand Ouks: SAGE Publications.
Markus, Hazel. 1977. “Self-schemata and processing information about the self.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (2): 63–78. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63.
Markus, Hazel, and Robert B. Zajonc. 1985. “The cognitive perspective in social psychology.” In Handbook of social psychology, ed. Garden Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, 137–230. New York: Random House.
Moussaid, Mehdi, Juliane E. Kämmer, Pantelis P. Analytis, and Hansjörg Neth [Moussaid et al.]. “Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation.” PloS one 8 (11): e78433. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078433.
Monin, Benoît, and Michael I. Norton. 2003. “Perceptions of a fluid consensus: Uncertainty and deflection in judgments of public opinion.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (5): 560–574. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029005001.
Montgomery, Robert L. 1992. “Social Influence and Conformity: A Transorientational Model.” In Social Judgment and Intergroup Relations, ed. Donald Granberg and Gian Sarup, 3–54. New York: Springer.
Norcross, John C., and James O. Prochaska. 2002. “Using the stages of change.” Harvard Mental Health Letter 18 (11): 5–7.
Prochaska, James O., and Carlo C. DiClemente. 1983. “Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51 (3): 390–395. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390.
Petty, Richard E., and Jon A. Krosnick. 1995. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. London: Psychology Press.
Strategijа za prevenciju i zaštitu dece od nasilja za period od 2020. do 2023. godine [Strategijа za prevenciju i zaštitu dece od nasilja], „Službeni glasnik RS”, 80/2020.
Stone, Jeff, and Joel Cooper. 2001. “A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 (3): 228–243. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1446.
Thomas, Emma F., Louis Winnifred R., and Craig McGarty [Thomas et al.] 2022. “Collective Action for Social Change: Individual, Group, and Contextual Factors Shaping Collective Action and Its Outcomes.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. Danny Osborne and Chris Sibley, 492–507. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Megan M., Mark P. Zanna, and Dale W. Griffin [Thompson et al.]. 1995. “Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence.” In Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, eds. Richard Petty and Jon Krosnick, 361–386. London: Psychology Press.
Turner, Jonathan H. 1991. The structure of sociological theory. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–458. DOI: 10.1126/science.7455683.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child [UN CRC]. 2007. “General comment No. 8 (2006): The right of the child to protection from corporal punishment and other cruel or degrading forms of punishment. CRC/C/CG/8, 2 March 2007. (arts. 19; 28, para. 2; and 37, inter alia).” Refworld. Last accessed 25 September 2024. https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/crc/2007/en/41020.
Vujović, Ranka. 2020. „Zabrana telesnog kažnjavanja dece u Srbiji.” Srpska politička misao 68 (2): 421–448. DOI: 10.22182/spm.6822020.19.