ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CENTRAL ECONOMIC PLANNING

  • Marko Pejković Институт за политичке студије у Београду
Keywords: AI, central economic planning, Gödel's theorems, algorithms, superintelligence, market, self-reference

Abstract


In this paper, the author will attempt to elaborate and complement the existing arguments about the impossibility of artificial intelligence (AI) ever enabling centralized efficient economic planning at the state level in the form of government plan. The rapid development of AI and other technologies in recent years has reawakened the debate about the upcoming technical capacities that could perhaps in the near future overcome all the weaknesses of centralized economic planning known from the previous century. However, the lack of conceptual prerequisites in the domain of AI that are necessary for successful centralized planning actually argues in favor of the fact that even any experiment on this topic is both scientifically and economically unjustified. The introductory part of the paper provides an overview of the main concepts and dilemmas within the debate, the next part discusses mathematical paradoxes as conceptual obstacles to economic planning with the help of AI (the problem of self-reference), while the final part of the paper will be a critique of the attempts of AI ideologists-architects to overcome these obstacles through the eventual fusion of humans and AI machines.

References

Boettke, Peter J. 2012. Living Economics. Oakland: The Independent Institute.

Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence – Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cockshott, W. Paul, and Allin Cottrell. 1993. Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham: Spokesman Books.

Cottrell, A., Cockshott, W.P., and Greg Michaelson. 2009. “Is economic planning hypercomputational? The argument from Cantor diagonalisation.” International Journal of Unconventional Computing 5 (3–4): 223–236.

Dapprich, Jan Philipp, and William Paul Cockshott. 2023. “Input-output planning and information.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 205 (2023): 412–422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.043

Devereaux, Abigail, Roger Koppl and Stuart Kauffman. 2024. “Creative evolution in economics.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 34 (2024): 489–514.

Elliott, Anthony. 2022. Making Sense of AI. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Ertel, Wolfgang. 2017. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer.

Girasa, Rosario. 2020. Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Harari, Yuval. 2020. “Read Yuval Harari's blistering warning to Davos in full.” World Economic Forum. Last accessed 21 june 2025. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/01/yuval-hararis-warning-davos-speech-future-predications/

Hayek, Friedrich. 1952. The Sensory Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hayek, Friedrich. 1963. “Rules, Perception and Intelligibillity.” Proceedings of the British Academy 48 (1962): 321–344.

Koppl, Roger. 2010. “Some epistemological implications of economic complexity.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 76 (2010): 859–872.

Lambert, Karras J., and Tate Fegley. 2023. “Economic Calculation in Light of Advances in Big Data and Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 206 (2023): 243–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.009

Luknar, Ivana. 2025. „Društvena dinamika u eri veštačke inteligencije.” Srpska politička misao 90 (2): 145–162.

Mises, Ludwig. 1998. Human Action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Moreno-Casas, Vicente, Victor I. Espinosa, and William Hongsong Wang. 2022. “The political economy of complexity: The case of cyber-communism.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 204 (2022): 566–580. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.042

Nguyen, Hai-Trieu. 2024. “The Incompleteness of Central Planning.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 27 (4): 22–43. DOI: 10.35297/001c.126016

Nieto, Maxi. 2023. “Economic Calculation, Complexity, and Cyber-Communism: Bad News for the Austrian School.” World Review of Political Economy 14 (2): 234–262. DOI: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.14.2.0234

Phelan, Steven E., and Nikolai G. Wenzel. 2023. “Big Data, Quantum Computing, and the Economic Calculation Debate: Will Roasted Cyberpigeons Fly into the Mouths of Comrades?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 206 (2023): 172–181. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.018

Rich, Elaine, Kevin Knight, and Shivashankar B. Nair. 2010. Artificial Intelligence. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.

Roughgarden, Tim. 2017. Algorithms Illuminated (Part 1: The Basics). San Francisco: Soundlikeyourself Publishing.

Russell, Stuart. 2019. Human Compatible – Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. New York City: Viking.

Samuel, Sigal. 2020. “Elon Musk wants to merge humans with AI. How many brains will be damaged along the way?” Vox. Last accessed on June 21, 2025. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23899981/elon-musk-ai-neuralink-brain-computer-interface

Van den Haag, Ernest. 1964. “The Planners and the Planned.” In: Central Planning and Neomercantilism, ed. Helmut Schoeck and James W. Wiggins, 19–39. New Jersey: D. van Nostrand Company.

Wang, Hao. 2001. A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy. Hong Kong: Asco Trade Typesetting.

Wang, William Hongsong, Victor I. Espinosa, and José Antonio Peña-Ramos. 2021. “Private Property Rights, Dynamic Efficiency and Economic Development: An Austrian Reply to Neo-Marxist Scholars Nieto and Mateo on Cyber-Communism and Market Process.” Economies 9 (165): 1–17. DOI: 10.3390/economies9040165

Winrich, J. Steven. 1984. “Self-Reference and the Incomplete Structure of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 18 (4): 987–1005.

Yampolskiy, Roman V. 2016. Artificial Superintelligence – A Futuristic Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press-Taylor&Francis Group.

Published
2025/10/07
Section
Articles