Tendencija upotrebe hemijskog, biološkog, radiološkog i nuklearnog oružja u terorističke svrhe
Sažetak
Hemijski, biološki, radiološki i nuklearni terorizam (CBRN) danas je ozbiljan problem, a njegova pretnja i korišćenje predstavlja uvod u novu epohu terorizma – epohu mnogo opasniju od bilo kog prethodnog perioda i terorizma sa kojim niko još ne zna kako da se nosi. Uznemirujuća je činjenica da teroristi mogu da dođu u posed oružja za masovno uništenje, a cilj rada je analiza verovatnoće CBRN terorističkih akcija gde je istaknuta sve veća zabrinutost i sve veći znaci konvergencije između terorizma i nekonvencionalnih CBRN oružja u terorističke svrhe. Terorizam danas uključuje tehnologije dostupne svakome, bilo gde i kada, raspoređene kroz inovativna rešenja, gde je neophodno takođe razumeti kompleksnu interakciju između dinamike ponašanja terorističkih grupa i odluka u vezi sa starim i novim tehnologijama. Perspektivu upotrebe CBRN terorizma potvrdile su mnoge države kao akutni bezbednosni izazov koji iziskuje efikasan i brz odgovor i reakciju. U radu će, takođe, biti rasvetljen odnos između terorističkih grupa i nekonvencionalnih oružja, kao i teškoće u identifikaciji faktora koji mogu izazvati njegovu eskalaciju. Nakon tragedije 11. septembra 2001. godine, ali i nekoliko godina pre, zvaničnici mnogih država istakli su mogućnost da terorističke organizacije vremenom dođu u posed nekonvencionalnih oružja i razviju mogućnosti njihove upotrebe protiv pojedinih država.
Reference
Baker, D., 2006. Fighting Terrorism: Biological, Nuclear, and Chemical Weapons. SIRS Discoverer.
Benjamin, D., 2008. Strategic Counterterrorism. Foreign policy at brookings. Police paper no. 7.
Bettis, R., 1998. The New Threat of Mass Destruction. Foreign Affairs, 77(1).
Bioterrorism, chemical weapons, and radiation terrorism, nd. Available at: http://nursece4less.com/tests/materials/n029cmaterials.pdf.
Mark, J.C., Taylor, T., Eyster, E., Maraman, W., Wechsler, J., 1987. Can terrorists build nuclear weapons? Lexington Books, United States.
Carus, S., 1999. Biohazard. The New Republic.
Cieslak, T.J. & Eitzen, E.M., 1999. Clinical and epidemiologic principles of anthrax. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 5(4), pp.552-555. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia: National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Condesman, A., & Burke, A., 2001. Chair in Strategy Asymmetric and terrorist attacks with chemical weapons. CSIS Homeland Defense: Asymmetric Warfare & Terrorism.
Danzing, R., 2003. U. S. Catastrophic bioterrorism: What is to be done? Washington, DC: National Defense University - Center for Technology and National Security Policy - Department of Defense. August; U. S. Government Printing Office.
Davis, J., & Johnson-Winegar, A., 2000. The Anthrax Terror DOD's Number-One Biological Threat. Aerospace power journal, pp.15-28, winter.
Eland, I., 1998. Defending Other Nations: The Risk to America's Homeland. USA Today magazine, 127(2640).
Foer, F., 1998. Toxic Shock. The New Republic.
Ganor, B., 1998. Non-Conventional Terrorism: Chemical, Nuclear, and Biological. ICT Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT).
Gompert, D.C., 2000. Sharpen the Fear. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 56(1), pp.22-23.
Hall, S., 1998. Science-Fiction Policy. Technology Review (Cambridge, Mass.), 101(6), p.92.
Hamele, M., Bradley Poss, W., Sweney, J., 2014. Disaster preparedness, pediatric considerations in primary blast injury, chemical, and biological terrorism. World J Crit Care Med, 3(1), pp.15-23. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v3.i1.15.
Ivanova, K., & Sandler, T., 2007. CBRN Attack Perpetrators: An Empirical Study. Published Articles & Papers. Paper 65.
Jesse, C., 2012. Optimization of nuclear, radiological, biological, and chemical terrorism incidence models through the use of simulated annealing Monte Carlo and iterative methods. [Internet]. Available at: https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/43599/coyle_jesse_a_201205_mast.pdf. Accessed: 24 May 2016.
Kopp, C., 2008. Chemical and biological weapons. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Kurmnik, B., & Ribnikar, D., 2003. Asymmetric wars. Belgrade: Evro Gi-unti. London, A.J., 2003. Threats to the Common Good: Biochemical Weapons and Human Subjects Research. Department of Philosophy. Paper 404.
Lowe, K., & Carus, S., 1997. Chemical and Biological Terrorism: Threat and Response. Washington Institute. Policy 2016, printed with permission PolicyWatch 247.
Meyer, M., Spinella, P., & Cieslak, T., 2014. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. Chapter: Agents of Biological and Chemical Terrorism, pp.645-656. [e-book]. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4471-6362-6_46. Accessed: 22 May 2016.
Mijalković, S., 2009. Nacionalna bezbednost. Zemun: Kriminalističko-policijska akademija.
O'Toole, T., 1999. Smallpox: An attack scenario. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 5(4), pp.540-546. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia: National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
O'Neill, K., 1997. The Nuclear Terrorist Threat. Institute for Science and International Security.
Palmer, I., 2004. The psychological dimension of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) terrorism. J R Army Med Corps, 150(1), pp.3-9.
Parachini, J., 2001. Combating Terrorism: Assessing the Threat of Biological Terrorism. [Internet]. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/2005/CT183.pdf. Accessed: 22 May 2016.
Post, J.M., 2005. The Psychology of WMD Terrorism. International Studies Review, 7(1), pp.148-151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-9488.2005.479_6.x.
Ruggiero, A., & Vos, M., 2015. Communication Challenges in CBRN Terrorism Crisis: Expert Perceptions. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(3) pp.138-148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12065.
Schwartz, R., 2013. Case Study - Syria's Chemical and Biological Weapons Program and the Use of These Weapons in the Syrian Civil War Today. [Internet]. Available at: https://www.ict.org.il/Article/694/Case%20Study-Syrias-Chemical-and-Biological-Weapons-Program. Accessed: 20 May 2016.
Shea, D.A., 2004. Terrorism: Background on Chemical, Biological, and Toxin Weapons and Options for Lessening. CRS Report for Congress. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/testimony/65.pdf. Accessed: 21 May 2016.
Stern, Dz., 2004. Extreme terrorists. Belgrade: Alexandria pres.
Tucker, J., 2000. Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons. The MIT Press. Book.
Tucker, D., 2001. What Is New About the New Terrorism and How Dangerous Is It. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(Autumn,) pp.1-14.
U.S. Congress House, 2003. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Furthering public health security: project bioshield Subcommittee on Health; Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness and Response. 108 Congress, 1 Session. 27 March. Washington, p.117.
U.S. Congress Senate, 2001. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Department of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies. 107 Congress, 1 Session Bioterrorism, October-November, Washington, DC: U.S. Government, p.255.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000. Biological and chemical terrorism: Strategic plan for preparedness and response. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 21 April Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Whitelaw, K., Strobel, P., & Duffy, B., 1999. It Was a Direct Hit, but Was It the Right Target? U.S. News & World Report, 127(7).
Wolf, Y., & Frankel, O., 2007. Terrorism: Toward an overarched account and prevention with a special Reference to pendulum interplay between both parties. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), pp.259-279.
Zanders, P.J., Karlsson, E., Melin, L., Naslund, E., & Thani, L., 2006. Fighting Terrorism: Biological, Nuclear, and Chemical Weapons Appendix. In: Risk assessment of terrorism with chemical and biological weapons.
Vojnotehnički glasnik omogućava otvoreni pristup i, u skladu sa preporukom CEON-a, primenjuje Creative Commons odredbe o autorskim pravima:
Autori koji objavljuju u Vojnotehničkom glasniku pristaju na sledeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga Creative Commons licencom koja omogućava drugima da dele rad uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju rada objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je rad izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni rad onlajn (npr. u institucionalnom repozitorijumu ili na svojim internet stranicama) pre i tokom postupka prijave priloga, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog rada (up. Efekat otvorenog pristupa).