Multicriteria approach to the selection of the training model of dangerous goods transport advisors in the Ministry of Defense and the Serbian Army

Vesko M. Lukovac; Svetlana R.  Zeljić Drakulić; Lazar M. Tomić; Feng Liu

doi:10.5937/vojtehg69-29030

Vesko M. Lukovac Univerzitet odbrane u Beogradu, Vojna akademija, Katedra logistike, Beograd, Republika Srbija https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-0184
Svetlana R. Zeljić Drakulić Vojska Srbije, Kopnena vojska, Komanda za obuku, Beograd, Republika Srbija https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3818-125X
Lazar M. Tomić Vojska Srbije, Kopnena vojska, 3. brigada, Niš, Republika Srbija https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3818-125X
Feng Liu Univerzitet „Zhejiang Vanli”, Fakultet za biznis, Ningbo, Narodna Republika Kina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-6510

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg69-29030

Ključne reči: model, obuka, savetnik za bezbednost transporta, opasna roba

Sažetak

Uvod/cilj: Napredak nauke i razvoj novih tehnologija doprinosi svakodnevnoj upotrebi sve većeg broja roba koje mogu izazvati neželjene posledice po bezbednost i zdravlja ljudi. Cilj ovog rada jeste izbor modela po kojem bi trebalo vršiti osposobljavanje lica za obavljanje funkcije savetnika za bezbednost transporta takvih vrsta roba u Ministarstvu odbrane (MO) i Vojsci Srbije (VS) .

Metode: Problem je rešavan pomoću AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) u kojem su učestvovala desetorica ekperata, a koji su zahvaljujući svojoj kompetentnosti (Đorović, 2003) doprineli konačnoj odluci.

Rezultati: Stabilnost konačne odluke potvrđena je dinamičkom analizom osetljivosti pomoću softvera Expert Choice 2000.

Zaključak: Rezultati sprovedenog istraživanja favorizovali su model po kojem bi obuku trebalo sprovoditi oslanjajući se na sopstvene kapacitete.

Reference

Altuzarra, A., Moreno-Jimenez, J.M. & Salvador, M.A. 2007. Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), pp.367-382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.025

Arnette, A., Zobel, C., Bosch, D., Pease, J. & Metcalfe, T. 2010. Stakeholder ranking of watershed goals with the vector analytic hierarchy process: Effects of participant grouping scenarios. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), pp.1459-1469. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.009.

Bernasconi, M., Choirat, C. & Seri, R. 2014. Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), pp.584-592. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.014.

Biswas, S., Bandyopadhyay, G., Guha, B. & Bhattacharjee, M. 2019. An ensemble approach for portfolio selection in a multi-criteria decision making framework. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(2), pp.138-158 [online]. Available at: https://www.dmame.rabek.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/51 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Blagojević, A., Vesković, S., Kasalica, S., Gojić, A. & Allamani, A. 2020. The application of the fuzzy AHP and DEA for measuring the efficiency of freight transport railway undertakings. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(2), pp.1-23 [online]. Available at: https://www.oresta.rabek.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/52 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Blagojević, B. 2015. Minimization of distance between group and individualdecisions using intelligent stochastic algorithms for waterand agricultural management. Ph.D. thesis. Novi Sad, Serbia: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture (in Serbian) [online]. Available at: https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/8802?locale-attribute=en [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Durmić, E., Stević, Ž., Chatterjee, P., Vasiljević, M. & Tomašević, M. 2020. Sustainable supplier selection using combined FUCOM – Rough SAW model. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), pp.34-43 [online]. Available at: https://frontpres.rabek.org/index.php/asd/article/view/4 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Escobar, M.T., Aguarón, J. & MorenoJiménez, J.M. 2004. A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorisation procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), pp.318-322. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00154-1.

Forman, E. & Peniwati, K. 1998. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1), pp.165-169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0.

Ho, W. 2008. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications–A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), pp.211-228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004.

Hot, I. 2014. Мanagement of conceptual designs creation in field of infrastructure by use of multi-criteria analysis. Ph.D. thes. Novi Sad, Serbia: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Science (in Serbian) [online]. Available at: https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/1901 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Jandrić, Z. & Srđević, B. 2000. Analitički hijerarhijski proces kao podrška odlučivanju u vodoprivredi. Vodoprivreda, 32, pp.186-188, pp.327-334 (in Serbian).

Janković, A. & Popović, M. 2019. Methods for assigning weights to decision makers in group AHP decision-making. Decision Making: Applicatons in Management and Engineering, 2(1), pp.147-165 [online]. Available at: https://www.dmame.rabek.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/35 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Janković, Z. 2016. The Development of Model for the Dangerous Goods Risk Calculation Inlogistics Systems. Ph.D. thes. Novi Sad, Serbia: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Science (in Serbian) [online]. Available at: https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/6681 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Jovanović, V.D. 2004. Transport opasnih materija. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering (in Serbian). ISBN: 86-7395-179-8.

Jovanović, V.D., Mladenović, D.M. & Milovanović, B.M. & 2010. Transport opasne robe u drumskom saobraćaju. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering (in Serbian). ISBN: 978-86-7395-266-6.

Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Turskis, Z., Stević, Ž. & Mardani, A. 2020. Modelling procedure for the selection of steel pipes supplier by applying fuzzy AHP method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(2), pp.39-53 [online]. Available at: https://oresta.rabek.org/index.php/oresta/article/view/53 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Lootsma, F.A. 1988. Numerical Scaling of Human Judgement in Pairwise-Comparison Methods for Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. In: Mitra, G., Greenberg, H.J., Lootsma, F.A., Rijkaert, M.J., Zimmermann, H.J. (Eds.) Mathematical Models for Decision Support. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), 48. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_3.

Lootsma, F.A. 1990. The french and the american school in multi-criteria decision analysis. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, 24(3), pp.263-285 [online]. Available at: http://www.numdam.org/item/RO_1990__24_3_263_0/ 6681 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Lootsma, F.A., Mensch, T.C.A. & Vos, F.A. 1990. Multi–criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long–term research planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 47(3), pp.293-305. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90216-X.

Ma, Z., Shao, C., Ma, S. & Ye, Z. 2011. Constructing road safety performance indicators using Fuzzy Delphi Method and Grey Delphi Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (3), pp.1509-1514. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.062.

Muravev, D. & Mijic, N. 2020. A Novel Integrated Provider Selection Multicriteria Model: The BWM-MABAC Model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), pp.60-78 [online]. Available at: https://dmame.rabek.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/57 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Pamučar, D. 2020. Normalized weighted Geometric Dombi Bonferoni Mean Operator with interval grey numbers: Application in multicriteria decision making. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), pp.44-52 [online]. Available at: https://www.frontpres.rabek.org/index.php/asd/article/view/5 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Pamučar, D., Sremac, S., Stević, Ž., Ćirović, G. & Tomić, D. 2019. New multi-criteria LNN WASPAS model for evaluating the work of advisors in the transport of hazardous goods. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(9), pp.5045-5068. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03997-7.

Petrović, Lj. 2004. Transport opasne robe u drumskom saobraćaju – Upoznavanje restrukturiranog ADR-a. Belgrade: Trigon inženjering (in Serbian).

Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L.S. 1994. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. European Journal of Operational Research, 79(2), pp.249-265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90356-5.

Saaty, T.L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), pp.234-281. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.

Stanković, M., Gladović, P. & Popović, V. 2019. Determining the importance of the criteria of traffic accessibility using fuzzy AHP and rough AHP method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), pp.86-104 [online]. Available at: https://dmame.rabek.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/27 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Subramanian, N. & Ramanathan, R. 2012. A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), pp.215-241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036.

Vaidya, O.S. & Kumar, S. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), pp.1-29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.

Vidović, M., Radivojević, G. & Ratković, B. 2019. Roba u logističkim procesima. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering (in Serbian). ISBN: 978-86-7395-398-4.

Žižović, M. & Pamučar, D. 2019. New model for determining criteria weights: Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(2), pp.126-137 [online]. Available at: https://www.dmame.rabek.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/48 [Accessed: 20 August 2021].

Višekriterijumski pristup izboru modela obuke savetnika za bezbednost transporta opasne robe u Ministarstvu odbrane i Vojsci Srbije

Sažetak

Reference

Vojnotehnički glasnik omogućava otvoreni pristup i, u skladu sa preporukom CEON-a, primenjuje Creative Commons odredbe o autorskim pravima:

Autori koji objavljuju u Vojnotehničkom glasniku pristaju na sledeće uslove: