Modeling of combat operations
Abstract
Introduction/purpose: The goal of the research in this paper is to present and evaluate the method of modeling operations by aggregating forces by simulating the battle process with Lanchester's equations. This method is the software basis of a certain number of programs used in NATO, in war simulations, and in the planning and analysis of operations. Its value is in understanding the consequences of decisions made with outcomes and results of combat actions.
Methods: The case study of the well-known Operation Desert Storm gathered the necessary data on operational parameters and the way forces are used in battles. The obtained data were transformed into operational variables of the combat model using the force aggregation method, whose simulation was carried out using the method of differential Lanchester's equations (quadratic law).
Results: By simulating the modeled operation, the parameters of the outcome of the conflict were obtained with numerical indicators of success, consumption of resources, etc. The results were analyzed and a certain correlation with the parameters of the real operation was determined, which enables the validation of the model.
Conclusion: The partial validity of the model describing the conflict on a practical historical example from a case study was confirmed. There are objective limitations in the application of modeling of military operations and optimization of the use of forces. The value of this method is the possibility of a reliable strategic assessment of the adversary's military power at the strategic level.
References
Allen, P.D. 1993. A RAND Note: Air Combat Model Engagement and Attrition Processes High Level Design. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND [online]. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2008/N3566.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Baik, S.-W. 2013. A Raid-Type War-Game Model Based on a Discrete Multi-Weapon Lanchester's Law. Management Science and Financial Engineering, 19(2), pp.31-36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7737/MSFE.2013.19.2.031.
Barkdoll, T.C., Gaver, D.P., Glazebrook, K.D., Jacobs, P.A. & Posadas, S. 2002. Suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) as an information duel. NRL-Naval Research Logistics, 49(8), pp.723-742. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10046.
Berenson, P. 1997. Letter from Dr. Berenson, Subject: Validation. The International TNDM Newsletter, 1(4), p.6 [online]. Available at: http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/pdf/v1n4.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Berkovitz, L.D. & Dresher, M. 1959. A Game-Theory Analysis of Tactical Air War. Operations Research, 7(5), pp.599-620. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.7.5.599.
Bonder, S. 1970. Letter to the Editor—The Mean Lanchester Attrition Rate. Operations Research, 18(1), pp.179-181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.18.1.179.
Bulger, J.A. 1997. Air Model Historical Data Study. The International TNDM Newsletter, 1(4), pp.21-28 [online]. Available at: http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/pdf/v1n5.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Correll, J.T., Reynolds, R.T., Birkey, D., Schanz, M., Deptula, D.A., Warden, J.A., Rice, D.B., Loh, J.M., Horner, C.A. & Lambeth, B.S. 2021. Desert Storm: 30 years later, Lessons from the 1991 Air Campaign in the Persian Gulf War. Arlington, VA, USA: The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies & The Air Force Association [online]. Available at: https://mitchellaerospacepower.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/a2dd91_a046ea712d0e4b7fb6f7afc4483df56f.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Coulson, S.G. 2019. Lanchester modeling of intelligence in combat. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 30(2), pp.149-164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpx014.
-Darcom Pamphlet No.706-102. 1979. Engineering Design Handbook: Army Weapon Systems Analysis, Part Two. Alexandria, VA, USA: Department of the Army Headquarters Us Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a086388.pdf. [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Deitchman, S.J. 1962. A Lanchester Model of Guerrilla Warfare. Operations Research, 10(6), pp.818-827. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.10.6.818.
Dupuy, T.N. 1997. Military History and Validation of Combat Models: A Presentation at MORS Mini-Symposium on Validation, 16 Oct 1990. The International TNDM Newsletter, 1(4), pp.11-13 [online]. Available at: http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/pdf/v1n4.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Engel, J.H. 1954. A Verification of Lanchester's Law. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(2), pp.163-171. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/166602 [Accessed: 19 March 2023]
Engelhard P.J. 1991. SSI Special Report: Desert Shield and Desert Storm, A Chronology and Troop List For the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf Crisis. U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA234743.pdf [Accessed: 19 April 2023].
Fricker, R.D. 1997. Attrition models of the Ardennes campaign. NRL-Naval Research Logistics, 45 (1), pp.1-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199802)45:1<1::AID-NAV1>3.0.CO;2-D.
-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993a. Planning and Command and Control. In: In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Survey, Vol. I. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329802/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-062.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042909-9.
-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993b. Operations and Effect and Effectiveness. In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Survey, Vol. II. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329806/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-067.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042910-2.
-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993c. Weapons, Tactics, and Training and Space Operations. In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Survey, Vol. IV. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329817/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-066.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042927-7.
-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993d. A Statistical Compendum and Chronology. In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Surwey, Vol. V. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329816/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-065.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042055-5.
Helmbold, R.L. 1965. Letter to the Editor—A Modification of Lanchester's Equations. Operations Research, 13(5), pp.857-859. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.13.5.857.
Helmbold, R.L. 1965. Letter to the Editor—A Modification of Lanchester's Equations. Operations Research, 13(5), pp.857-859. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.13.5.857.
Holter, W.H. 1973. A Method for Determining Individual and Combined Weapons Effectiveness Measures Utilizing the Results of a High-Resolution Combat Simulation Model. McLean, VA, USA: General Research Corp Mclean [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADP000609 [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Howes, D.R. & Thrall, R.M. 1973. A theory of ideal linear weights for heterogeneous combat forces. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 20(4), pp.645-659. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800200406.
Hsiao, H. & Guu, S.-M. 2004. A Differential Game for Air-Land Combat Operations, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management. Semantic Scholar [online]. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6d7f/b13da1da57a9b5d3803c08941ccdb929b61b.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Isaacs, R. 1965. Differential Games. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 0-486-40682-2.
Keaney, T.A. & Cohen, E.A. 1993. Gulf War: Air Power Survey, Summary Report. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329801/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-061.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-041950-6.
Kress, M. 2020. Lanchester Models for Irregular Warfare. Mathematics, 8(5), art. number:737. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050737.
Lanchester, F.W. 1916. Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm. London, UK: Constable and Company Limited [online]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/aircraftinwarfar00lancrich/page/30/mode/1up?ref=ol&view=theater [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Lucas, T.W. & Turkes, T. 2004. Fitting Lanchester Equations to the Battles of Kursk and Ardennes. NRL-Naval Research Logistics, 51(1), pp.95-116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10101.
MacKay, N.J. 2006. Lanchester combat models. arXiv:math/0606300 [math.HO]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0606300.
Protopopescu, V., Santoro, R.T., Cox, R.L. & Rusu, P. 1990. Technical Report: Combat modeling with partial differential equations: The bidimensional case. OSTI.GOV U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2172/5233113.
Taylor, J.G. 1980a. Lanchester-Type Models of Warfare. Volume I. Monterey, CA, USA: Naval Postgraduate School [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA090842 [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Taylor, J.G. 1980b. Lanchester-Type Models of Warfare, Volume II. Monterey, CA, USA: Calhoun-The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository [online]. Available at: https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/40200 [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Washburn, А. 2000. Lanchester Systems. Monterey, CA, USA: Naval Postgraduate School [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA383409.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Washburn, А., Caldwell, B., Hartman, J., Parry, S. & Youngren, M. 2022. Aggregated Combat Models. Monterey, CA, USA: Naval Postgraduate School, Operations Research Department [online]. Available at: http://faculty.nps.edu/awashburn/ . [Accessed: 19 March 2023].
Washburn, А. & Kress, М, А. 2009, Combat Modeling. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 100-105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0790-5.
Copyright (c) 2023 Mladen S. Kostić, Aca D. Jovanović, Mitar V. Kovač
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Proposed Creative Commons Copyright Notices
Proposed Policy for Military Technical Courier (Journals That Offer Open Access)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).