Modelovanje borbenih operacija

Ključne reči: vazduhoplovno-kopnene borbene operacije, iscrpljivanje, model agregatnih snaga

Sažetak


Uvod/cilj: Cilj istraživanja je provera i procena aproksimativne metode modela strategijskih borbenih dejstava agregatnih snaga, baziranim na Lančesterovim jednačinama.

Metode: Studijom slučaja poznate operacije „Pustinjska oluja” prikupljeni su potrebni podaci o borbenim sposobnostima i snazi neprijatelja, operativnim faktorima, doktrinarnim principima i načinu upotrebe snaga u borbi. Dobijeni podaci su obrađeni metodom agregacije sila, transformišući snage heterogenog sastava u homogene. Modelovanje bitke je sprovedeno metodom diferencijalnih Lančesterovih jednačina.

Rezultati: Potvrđena je delimična validnost modela koji opisuje sukob na praktičnom istorijskom primeru iz studije slučaja, uzimajući u obzir uticaj parametara ishoda sukoba, odnosa gubitaka, potrošnje ubojnih sredstava i broja izvedenih vazduhoplovnih misija. 

Zaključak: Postoje objektivna ograničenja u primeni modelovanja vojnih operacija, i optimizaciji upotrebe snaga na taktičkom i operativnom nivou. Vrednost ovog metoda jeste mogućnost pouzdane strateške procene vojne moći protivnika na strateškom nivou.

 

Reference

Allen, P.D. 1993. A RAND Note: Air Combat Model Engagement and Attrition Processes High Level Design. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND [online]. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2008/N3566.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Baik, S.-W. 2013. A Raid-Type War-Game Model Based on a Discrete Multi-Weapon Lanchester's Law. Management Science and Financial Engineering, 19(2), pp.31-36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7737/MSFE.2013.19.2.031.

Barkdoll, T.C., Gaver, D.P., Glazebrook, K.D., Jacobs, P.A. & Posadas, S. 2002. Suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) as an information duel. NRL-Naval Research Logistics, 49(8), pp.723-742. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10046.

Berenson, P. 1997. Letter from Dr. Berenson, Subject: Validation. The International TNDM Newsletter, 1(4), p.6 [online]. Available at:  http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/pdf/v1n4.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Berkovitz, L.D. & Dresher, M. 1959. A Game-Theory Analysis of Tactical Air War. Operations Research, 7(5), pp.599-620. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.7.5.599.

Bonder, S. 1970. Letter to the Editor—The Mean Lanchester Attrition Rate. Operations Research, 18(1), pp.179-181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.18.1.179.

Bulger, J.A. 1997. Air Model Historical Data Study. The International TNDM Newsletter, 1(4), pp.21-28 [online]. Available at:  http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/pdf/v1n5.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Correll, J.T., Reynolds, R.T., Birkey, D., Schanz, M., Deptula, D.A., Warden, J.A., Rice, D.B.,  Loh, J.M., Horner, C.A. & Lambeth, B.S. 2021. Desert Storm: 30 years later, Lessons from the 1991 Air Campaign in the Persian Gulf War. Arlington, VA, USA: The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies & The Air Force Association [online]. Available at:  https://mitchellaerospacepower.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/a2dd91_a046ea712d0e4b7fb6f7afc4483df56f.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Coulson, S.G. 2019. Lanchester modeling of intelligence in combat. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 30(2), pp.149-164. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpx014.

-Darcom Pamphlet No.706-102. 1979. Engineering Design Handbook: Army Weapon Systems Analysis, Part Two. Alexandria, VA, USA: Department of the Army Headquarters Us Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command [online]. Available at:  https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a086388.pdf. [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Deitchman, S.J. 1962. A Lanchester Model of Guerrilla Warfare. Operations Research, 10(6), pp.818-827. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.10.6.818.

Dupuy, T.N. 1997. Military History and Validation of Combat Models: A Presentation at MORS Mini-Symposium on Validation, 16 Oct 1990. The International TNDM Newsletter, 1(4), pp.11-13 [online]. Available at: http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/pdf/v1n4.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Engel, J.H. 1954. A Verification of Lanchester's Law. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(2), pp.163-171. Available at:  https://www.jstor.org/stable/166602 [Accessed: 19 March 2023]

Engelhard P.J. 1991. SSI Special Report: Desert Shield and Desert Storm, A Chronology and Troop List For the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf Crisis. U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA234743.pdf [Accessed: 19 April 2023].

Fricker, R.D. 1997. Attrition models of the Ardennes campaign. NRL-Naval Research Logistics, 45 (1), pp.1-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199802)45:1<1::AID-NAV1>3.0.CO;2-D

-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993a. Planning and Command and Control. In: In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Survey, Vol. I. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at:  https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329802/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-062.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042909-9.

-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993b. Operations and Effect and Effectiveness. In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Survey, Vol. II. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online].  Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329806/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-067.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042910-2.

-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993c. Weapons, Tactics, and Training and  Space Operations. In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Survey, Vol. IV. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online].  Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329817/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-066.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042927-7.

-Gulf War Air Power Surwey. 1993d. A Statistical Compendum and Chronology. In: Cohen, E.A. (Director) & Staff Gulf War Air Power Surwey, Vol. V. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at:  https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329816/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-065.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-042055-5.

Helmbold, R.L. 1965. Letter to the Editor—A Modification of Lanchester's Equations. Operations Research, 13(5), pp.857-859. Available at:   https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.13.5.857.

Helmbold, R.L. 1965. Letter to the Editor—A Modification of Lanchester's Equations. Operations Research, 13(5), pp.857-859. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.13.5.857.

Holter, W.H. 1973. A Method for Determining Individual and Combined Weapons Effectiveness Measures Utilizing the Results of a High-Resolution Combat Simulation Model. McLean, VA, USA: General Research Corp Mclean [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADP000609 [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Howes, D.R. & Thrall, R.M. 1973. A theory of ideal linear weights for heterogeneous combat forces. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 20(4), pp.645-659. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800200406.

Hsiao, H. & Guu, S.-M. 2004. A Differential Game for Air-Land Combat Operations, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management. Semantic Scholar [online]. Available at:  https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6d7f/b13da1da57a9b5d3803c08941ccdb929b61b.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Isaacs, R. 1965. Differential Games. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 0-486-40682-2.

Keaney, T.A. & Cohen, E.A. 1993. Gulf War: Air Power Survey, Summary Report. Washington, DC, USA: United State Department of the Air Force & US. Government Printing Office [online]. Available at:   https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329801/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-061.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023]. ISBN: 0-16-041950-6.

Kress, M. 2020. Lanchester Models for Irregular Warfare. Mathematics, 8(5), art. number:737. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050737.

Lanchester, F.W. 1916. Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm. London, UK: Constable and Company Limited [online]. Available at:   https://archive.org/details/aircraftinwarfar00lancrich/page/30/mode/1up?ref=ol&view=theater [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Lucas, T.W. & Turkes, T. 2004. Fitting Lanchester Equations to the Battles of Kursk and Ardennes. NRL-Naval Research Logistics, 51(1), pp.95-116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10101.

MacKay, N.J. 2006. Lanchester combat models. arXiv:math/0606300 [math.HO]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0606300.

Protopopescu, V., Santoro, R.T., Cox, R.L. & Rusu, P. 1990. Technical Report: Combat modeling with partial differential equations: The bidimensional case. OSTI.GOV U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2172/5233113.

Taylor, J.G. 1980a. Lanchester-Type Models of Warfare. Volume I. Monterey, CA, USA: Naval Postgraduate School [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA090842 [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Taylor, J.G. 1980b. Lanchester-Type Models of Warfare, Volume II. Monterey, CA, USA: Calhoun-The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository [online]. Available at: https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/40200 [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Washburn, А. 2000. Lanchester Systems. Monterey, CA, USA: Naval Postgraduate School [online]. Available at:  https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA383409.pdf [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Washburn, А., Caldwell, B., Hartman, J., Parry, S. & Youngren, M. 2022. Aggregated Combat Models. Monterey, CA, USA: Naval Postgraduate School, Operations Research Department [online]. Available at:  http://faculty.nps.edu/awashburn/ . [Accessed: 19 March 2023].

Washburn, А. & Kress, М, А. 2009, Combat Modeling. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 100-105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0790-5.

Objavljeno
2023/06/08
Rubrika
Originalni naučni radovi