Unapređenje procesa operativnog planiranja primenom hibridnog fazi-višekriterijumskog pristupa odlučivanju

Ključne reči: višekriterijumsko odlučivanje (VKO), DEMATEL, KOPRAS, trouglasti fazi skupovi, operativno planiranje

Sažetak


Uvod/cilj: U radu je prikazana mogućnost optimizacije donošenja odluka u procesu operativnog planiranja u artiljerijsko-raketnim jedinicama za protivvazduhoplovna dejstva primenom metoda višekriterijumskog odlučivanja u fazi okruženju. Analizom sadržaja dostupne literature, određeni su kriterijumi na osnovu kojih je moguće vrednovati i porediti varijante upotrebe artiljerijsko-raketnih jedinica za protivvazduhoplovna dejstva koje razvijaju članovi grupe za operativno planiranje u toku procesa operativnog planiranja. Kriterijumi se zasnivaju na parametrima ocenjivanja varijanti upotrebe iz matrice odlučivanja u fazi poređenja varijanti upotrebe.

Metode: Predloženi pristup koji kombinuje metode DEMATEL i KOPRAS uspešno je modifikovan trouglastim fazi skupovima. Metoda fazi-DEMATEL primenjena je za određivanje težine kriterijuma, a fazi-KOPRAS metoda za vrednovanje alternativa – varijanti upotrebe.

Rezultati: Integrisano je više fazi-višekriterijumskih metoda odlučivanja u jedinstven model koji se može primeniti u procesu planiranja operacija radi optimizacije procesa donošenja odluka.

Zaključak: Rad doprinosi vojnoj nauci prilikom donošenja odluka u procesu operativnog planiranja na taktičkom nivou u artiljerijsko-raketnim jedinicama za protivvazduhoplovna dejstva.

Reference

Alinezhad, A., Khalili, J., Alinezhad, A. & Khalili, J. 2019. New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15009-9.

Ataei, Y., Mahmoudi, A., Feylizadeh, M.R. & Li, D.-F. 2020. Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making. Applied Soft Computing, 86, art.number:105893. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893.

Baykasoğlu, A. & Gölcük, İ. 2017. Development of an interval type-2 fuzzy sets based hierarchical MADM model by combining DEMATEL and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 70, pp.37-51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.001.

Božanić, D.I., Pamučar, D.S. & Karović, S.M. 2016. Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation. Tehnika, 71(1), pp.129-136 (in Serbian). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/tehnika1601129B.

-Canadian Army Command and Staff College. 2018. The Operational Planning Process: OPP Handbook CACSC-PUB-500. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Army Command and Staff College [online]. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/dnd-mdn/army/lineofsight/files/articlefiles/en/CACSC-PUB-500-2018.pdf [Accessed: 10 May 2024].

Chang, D.Y. 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), pp.649-655. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.

Field A.P. 2005. Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance. In: Everitt, B.S. & Howell, D.C. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, 2, pp.1010-1011. New York: Wiley [online]. Available at: https://discoveringstatistics.com/repository/kendall's_coefficient_of_concordance_ebs.pdf [Acessed: 05 July 2024]. ISBN: 978-0-470-86080-9

Ghorabaee, M.K., Amiri, M., Sadaghiani, J.S. & Goodarzi, G.H. 2014. Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75, pp.1115-1130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6142-7.

Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A.T. & Guneri, A.F. 2016. A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Applied Soft Computing, 46, pp.60-89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.040.

Inđić, D., Petrović, I., Ivanković, N. & Đukić, Đ. 2018. Chemical accident area reconnaissance by unmanned aircraft. Vojno delo, 70(8), pp.109-127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1808109I.

Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., Sarı, İ.U. & Turanoğlu, E. 2014. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, pp.48-57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.001.

Khan, F., Ali, Y. & Pamucar, D. 2022. A new fuzzy FUCOM-QFD approach for evaluating strategies to enhance the resilience of the healthcare sector to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Kybernetes, 51(4), pp.1429-1451. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2021-0130.

Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.-H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of operational research, 156(2), pp.445-455. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.

Pamučar, D. & Ćirović, G. 2015. The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), pp.3016-3028. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057.

Petrović, J. & Petrović, I. 2021. What makes a successful helicopter pilot? A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 11(4), pp.507-527. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte2021.11(4).02.

Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J. & Roy, R. 2015. A Review of Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods for Enhanced Maintenance Delivery. Procedia CIRP, 37, pp.30-35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.086.

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A. & Chatterjee, P. 2020. Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, art.number:106231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231.

Tešić, T. & Božanić, D. 2023. Optimizing Military Decision-Making: Application of the FUCOM– EWAA–COPRAS-G MCDM Model. Acadlore Transactions on Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 1(3), pp.148-160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56578/atams010303.

-UK Ministry of Defence. 2019. Allied Joint Publication-5 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Planning of Operations. Ministry of Defence UK [e-book]. Bristol: UK Ministry of Defence [online]. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6054d017e90e0724be025a8f/20210310-AJP_5_with_UK_elem_final_web.pdf [Accessed: 12 May 2024].

Yu, S.M., Wang, J. & Wang, J.Q. 2017. An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Likelihood-Based MABAC Approach and Its Application in Selecting Hotels on a Tourism Website. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19, pp.47-61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0217-6.

Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. & Tamošaitiene, J. 2008. Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(2), pp.85-93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3.

Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. & Kildienė, S. 2014. State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), pp.165-179. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037.

Žižović, M. & Pamučar, D. 2019. New model for determining criteria weights: Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(2), pp.126-137. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1902102z.

Objavljeno
2024/09/28
Rubrika
Originalni naučni radovi