A comparative study of turbulence models for predicting the aerodynamic drag of a spin-stabilized projectile

Keywords: turbulence models, Ansys Fluent, spin-stabilized projectiles, subsonic flow, supersonic flight regime

Abstract


Introduction/purpose: In this research, the influence of different turbulence models on the aerodynamic drag prediction of a generic spin-stabilized projectile was analyzed. The turbulence models chosen for investigation were one-equation Spalart-Allmaras, two-equation models Standard k-ε, Realizable k-ε, Standard k-ω and SST k-ω. The special sniper projectile M118 was selected for the study.

Methods: The flows around the projectile were numerically simulated  using RANS equations intergrated into ANSYS Fluent software with different turbulence models. The numerical simulation was carried out at various Mach numbers to study the effect of turbulence models on the projectile aerodynamic drag prediction. The computational results were compared to the available experimental data to evaluate the ability of the turbulence models .

Results: The research results have shown that the turbulence models significantly affect the numerical simulation results. The Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model performs better than other models in the subsonic flow regime. The Standard k-ε, Realizable k-ε and SST k-ω models perform better than other models in the  supersonic flow regime. 

Conclusion: Computational Fluid Dynamics is a powerful tool to analyze the aerodynamics of flying bodies. By appropriately selecting turbulence models, the flow around flying bodies can be accurately investigated. In the case of generic ogive-cylinder-boattail projectiles, on the one hand, the Spalart-Allmaras model is suitable for subsonic flow, and the Standard k-ε, Realizable k-ε and SST k-ω models are recommended for the supersonic flight regime, on the other hand.

References

Bui, X.S., Nguyen, Q. T., Nguyen, H. M. & Doan, V.D. 2024. Theoretical study on the sabot separation process of a sub-caliber projectile fired from rifled guns. Defense and Security Studies, 5, pp.29-45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37868/dss.v5.id264.

Demir, H., Cimen, M., Yilman, O. & Tekin, E. 2024. Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Drag Reduction in Bullet via Geometric Modifications. Bayburt University Journal of Science, 7(1), pp.47-56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55117/bufbd.1493857.

Ferfouri, A., Allouche, T., Jerković, D.D., Hristov, N., Vučković, M. & Benmeddah, A. 2023. Prediction of drag aerodynamic coefficient of the 155 mm projectile under axisymmetric flow using different approaches. Journal of the Serbian Society for Computational Mechanics, 17(2), pp.69-86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24874/jsscm.2023.17.02.06.

Gholap, T.B., Salokhe, R.V., Ghadage, G.V., Mane, S.V. & Sahoo, D. 2022. Aerodynamic analysis of an AK-47 bullet moving at Mach 2.0 in close proximity to the ground. FME Transactions, 50(2), pp.369-381. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/fme2201369G.

Hamel, N. & Gagnon, E. 2011. CFD and Parametric Study on a 155 mm Artillery Shell Equipped with a Roll-Decoupled Course Correction Fuze. In: 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 27-30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3027.

Hao, B., Jiang, Q., Xu, C. & Liu, L. 2024. Aerodynamic Characterization of Bullet Heads with Different Arcuate Curves. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 17(5), pp.1015-1026. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.17.05.2333.

Jang, Y., Huh, J., Lee, N., Lee, S. & Park, Y. 2018. Comparative Study on the Prediction of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Aircraft with Turbulence Models. International Journal of Aeronautical & Space Sciences, 19, pp.13-23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0022-6.

Jiajan, W., Chue, R.S.M, Nguyen, T. & Yu, S.C.M. 2015. Boattail juncture shaping for spin-stabilized rounds in supersonic flight. Shock Waves, 25, pp.189-204. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-015-0550-y.

Julian, J., Iskandar, W. & Wahyuni, F. 2023. Effect of Mesh Shape and Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Performance at NACA 4415. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 16(12), pp.2504-2517. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.16.12.1983.

Launder, B.E. & Spalding, D.B. 1974. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3(2), pp.269-289. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2.

Luo, A.A., Xiao, Q.K., Liu, X., Guo, J.C. & Zhang, Y.H. 2024. Numerical Study on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Tail-stabilized Projectile with Asymmetrical Diversion Groove. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 17(1), pp.116-135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.17.1.2062.

Matsson, J.E. 2023. An Introduction to Ansys Fluent 2023. Mission, KS, USA: SDC Publications. ISBN: 978-1-63057-648-6.

McCoy, R.L. 1988. The aerodynamic characteristics of 7.62mm match bullets. Defense Technical Information Center: U.S. Army Laboratory Command, Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA205633.pdf [Accessed: 07 November 2024].

Menter, F.R. 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), pp.1598-1605. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.

Muthukumaran, C.K., Rajesh, G. & Kim, H.D. 2013. Launch Dynamics of Supersonic Projectiles. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 50(6), pp.1150-1162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32466.

Nguyen, Q.T., Nguyen, H.M. & Son, B.X. 2024. Numerical investigation on the supersonic flow around a saboted bullet. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 72(2), pp.676-694. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg72-48837.

Sertkaya, A.A., Caliskan, C. & Neseli, S. 2022. Comparison of Real and Simulation Aerodynamic Coefficients for 155 mm Ammunition Using Open-Source Code SU2 Software. Journal of Polytechnic, 25(4), pp.1835-1845. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1133519.

Shih, T.-H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z. & Zhu, J. 1994. A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 24(3), pp.227-238. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.

Silton, S.I. 2002. Navier-Stokes Computations for a Spinning Projectile From Subsonic to Supersonic Speeds. Defense Technical Information Center: Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA407616.pdf [Accessed: 07 November 2024].

Silton, S.I. 2005. Navier-Stokes Computations for a Spinning Projectile from Subsonic to Supersonic Speeds. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 42(2), pp.223-231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4175.

Silton, S.I. 2011. Navier-Stokes Predictions of Aerodynamic Coefficients and Dynamic Derivatives of a 0.50-cal Projectile. In: 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 27-3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3030.

Somashekar, V. & Immanuel Selwyn Raj, A. 2021. Comparative Study on the Prediction of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Mini - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Turbulence Models. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 8(1), art.number:7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2021.1559.

Spalart, P. & Allmaras, S. 1992. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, January 06-09. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-439.

Wilcox, D.C. 1998. Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 2nd Edition. DCW industries La Canada.

Xu, Y., Dong, F. & Zheng, N. 2022. Ballistic and Aerodynamic Characteristics Simulation for Trajectory Correction Projectile. Mechanika, 28(3), pp.230-236. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.31431.

Published
2025/02/01
Section
Original Scientific Papers