EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CHILDBIRTH TRENDS IN SERBIA

  • Snezana Radovanovic Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Serbia
  • Milena Maricic Academy of Applied Studies Belgrade, Department of School of Applied Health Science Studies, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Sladjana Radivojevic Health Centеr Topola, Serbia
  • Predrag Stanojlovic Special hospital for hyperbaric medicine, Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia
  • Divna Simovic Šiljkovic Health Centеr Gornji Milanovac, Serbia
  • Marija Mujkovic Health Centеr Lapovo, Serbia
  • Mirjana Gazdic General practitioner, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
Keywords: Descriptive study, fertility, trend

Abstract


Introduction/Aim: In recent decades, declines in fertility rates have been reported in almost every country in the world. The aim of the research is the analysis of epidemiological characteristics and childbirth trends in Serbia in the period 2007-2016.

Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective, descriptive, epidemiological study. The research data were collected from the Health Statistical Yearbooks of the Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut" in the period 2007-2016. Total fertility rates, stillbirth rates, birth rates, infant mortality rates, and preterm birth rates were used for the analysis of data, while the linear trend and regression analysis were used to analyze the trend.

Results: Average rate of general fertility in Serbia in the period 2007-2016 was 1.5 children per woman.In the period 2007-2016, 660,069 births were registered in Serbia with a total of 671,715 children born, of which 4,054 were stillborn (0.6%). Two thirds (66.1%) of stillborn children were born prematurely. The number of premature births increased with maternal age. Of 667,661 live births in maternity hospitals, 924 newborns died (0.1%). In the observed period, a continuous trend of decreasing number of births was registered (y = 68,427-439.99x, R2 = 0.628), as well as the number of live births (y = 69,084-421.44x, R2 = 0.591). The trend of still birth rates showed a slight decrease (y = 6,138-0,012x, R2 = 0,016), as well as the trend of infant mortality rates (y = 1,882-50,091x, R2 = 0,683), but there came to an increase in the trend of the general fertility rate (y = 39.481 + 0.242x, R2 = 0.544). The average general fertility rate for the ten-year period was 41.1 live births per 1000 women of the fertile period and ranged from 38.2‰ to 41.7‰. The largest increase in the fertility rate was registered in the age group 40-44 years from 3.8‰ in 2007 to 9.9‰ in 2016 (2.6 times more), and then in the age group 30-39 years with 43.2‰ in 2007 to 63.0 ‰ in 2016 (1.4 times more). There came to a decline in the fertility rate at the age of 20-29 from 80.4‰ in 2007 to 72.2 ‰ in 2016. The highest rates of stillbirth were registered in the oldest group of 45-49 years (23.3 ‰), and the lowest in persons younger than 15 years (0.7‰).

Conclusion: Birth revitalization policies must engage all levels of society to build awareness and moral responsibility for fertility.

References

Nakajima H. World Health Day 1998. Message from the Director-General. Geneva: World Health Organization,1998.

Rasevic M. Serbia twenty years after the Cairo Conference: Is there any progress in the sphere of reproductive health? Matica Srpska Journal of Social Sciences 2013; 144(3):413-28.

United Nations. International Conference on Population and Development Program of Actions. 1995. New York: UNFPA; 2014. Available at: http://www.unfpa.org/publications/international-conference-population-anddevelopment programme-action.

Introduction to reproductive health and the environment Public Health and the Environment. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2011.

United Nations Population Information Network (POPIN). Guidelines on reproductive health. Geneva: United Nations Population Information Network, 2002.

Devedzic M, Stojilkovic Gnjatovic J. Demographic profile of the old population of Serbia. Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2015.

Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet 2016;388(10063):3027-35.

Haram K, Mortensen JH, Wollen AL. Preterm delivery: an overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82(8):687-704.

Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, Zhang S, Moller AB, Gemmill A, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Lancet 2016; 387 (10017):462-74.

Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: Cross-sectional study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 192:342–349.

Patton GC, Coffey C, Sawyer SM, Viner RM, Haller DM, Bose K, Vos T, Ferguson J, Mathers CD. Global patterns of mortality in young people: a systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2009; 374:881–892.

Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels JD, et al.Global Causes of Maternal Death: A WHO Systematic Analysis. Lancet Global Health 2014; 2(6):e323-e333.

UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank, United Nations Population Division. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2015. The Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). New York: UNICEF, 2015.

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2016; 4(2):e98-e108.

UN. World Population Prospects – The 2017 Revision, Key findings and advance tables. New York: United Nations – Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2017.

The World Bank. Fertility rate, total (births per woman). Available from: ttps://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CBRT.IN.

World Health Organization. World Report on Ageing and Health. Health in older age, 2015. Available from: www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/

Penev G. Population structure by gender and age. „Population and Households of Serbia according to the 2002 Census”, Belgrade, Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2006.

Devedzic M. Basic characteristics of the process and state in the natural movement. „Strategy of the regional development of the Republic of Serbia, Study-analytical base – demographic development“. Belgrade: Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, 2009.

Devedzic M, Stojilkovic Gnjatovic J. Demographic profile of the old population of Serbia. Belgrade, Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2015.

Kupiszewski M, Kupiszewska D, Nikitovic V. The impact of demographic and migration flows on Serbia. International Organization for Migrations, Mission in Belgrade, Project „Strengthening the institutional capacities of the Republic of Serbia for the migration management and reintegration” Belgrade: Dosije studio, 2012.

Eurostat, 2017. Eurostat on-line database. Demography and migration/Fertility: Fertility indicators table. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Myrskylä M, Margolis R. Happiness: Before and after the kids. Demography 2014;51(5):276-347.

Devedzic M. On the natural movement of population. Belgrade, The Institute for textbooks and educational resources, 2006.

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard M, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, Adler A, Garcia CV, Rohde S, Say L, Lawn JE. National, regional and worldwide estimates of preterm birth. The Lancet 2012; 379(9832):2162-72.

Published
2020/12/13
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLE