CROSS-SECTION STUDIES: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

  • Sandra Grujicic Institute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
  • Aleksandra Nikolic Institute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
Keywords: cross-sectional study, advantages, disadvantages, odds ratio

Abstract


The cross-sectional study belongs to the group of observational studies. Some authors classify cross-sectional studies as analytical studies and others as descriptive studies. The names for this study are both the prevalence study and the transversal study. In this study, the exposure to risk factors and the existence of the disease is determined simultaneously. These studies are a “snapshot” of the current situation. They are most suitable for public health planning, etiological testing, and diagnostic testing. They are not used for research on short-term diseases and rare health disorders, and their main drawback is that the direction of the cause-and-effect relationship cannot be determined. On the other hand, these studies are cheaper, faster, and easier to perform and do not scatter data compared to cohort studies, and compared to case studies and controls, they are performed on a representative sample, and there is no recall bias regarding exposure to risk factors.

References

Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in medicine. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1987.

Rothman K. Epidemiology: an introduction. New York: Oxford University Press Inc; 2002.

Jarebinski M, Vlajinac H, urednici. Epidemiologija. Beograd: Medicinski fakultet; 2006.

Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellstrom T. Basic Epidemiology. 2nd India: World Health Organisation, 2006: 39-41.

Radovanović Z, urednik. Epidemiologija. Novi Sad: Medicinski fakultet; 2008.

Gordis L. Epidemiology. 5th Canada: Elsevier Saunders, 2014.

Šipetić Grujičić S, Nikolić A. Primena studije preseka u medicine bola. In: Stevanović P, Nešić D, Lađević N, urednici. Medicina bola. Medicinski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu: Beograd; 2019: p. 111-116.

Setia MS. Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian J Dermatol 2016; 61(3): 261–264.

Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychological Med Indian J Psychol Med 2013; 35(2):121-6.

Falaschetti E, Mindell J, Knott C, Poulter N. Hypertension management in England: a serial cross-sectional study from 1994 to 2011. Lancet 2014; 383(9932):1912-9.

Šipetić Grujičić S, Dragan M, Soldatović I, Nikolić A, Vujčić I. Prehypertension and hypertension prevalence and risk factors among adult population in Republic of Serbia: A cross-sectional study. Vojnosanit Pregl 2020; 77(6): 590–600.

Lee BE, Ha EH, Park HS, Kim HJ, Lee YK, et al. (Air pollution and respiratory symptoms of school children in a panel study in Seoul). J Prev Med Public Health 2005; 38 (4): 465-72.

Published
2021/12/31
Section
ACTUAL TOPIC