NURSING STUDENTS` ATTITUDES TOWARDS MONITORING PATIENTS' VITAL SIGNS

  • Katarina Pavlovic Jugovic Sveti Sava High School, Loznica, Republic of Serbia
  • Dragana Simin Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia
Keywords: nursing students, vital signs, attitudes

Abstract


Introduction/aim: Data on the attitudes of nursing students towards the monitoring of patient's vital signs are insufficient. The aim of this study was to examine the attitudes of students towards the monitoring of patients' vital signs.

Methods: The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study, by surveying 193 students of Undergraduate Academic Studies in Nursing and Undergraduate Applied Studies in Nursing at the Faculty of Medicine in Novi Sad. The data were collected using the general questionnaire and V-scale.

Results: The attitude of the majority of nursing students (88.6%) regarding the monitoring of patient's vital signs at the Faculty of Medicine in Novi Sad, according to the total score of the V-scale, was ambivalent. The largest number of students (91.7%) expressed a positive attitude towards the statements in the domain of communications, ambivalent in the domain of technologies (61.1%), and negative in the domain of key indicators (28.0%). The analysis of students’ attitudes towards vital signs monitoring in relation to gender showed a significant difference in the domain of communication. The value of the average score in the domain of communication was significantly lower in men (4.04+0.75) than in women (4.37+0.67). Students who had completed vocational secondary school had significantly higher values of average score in the domain of knowledge (3.44+0.72) in comparison to students who had previously completed high school or some other school (3.13+0.86), but a significant difference was not obtained for the other domains of V-scale. The students of final years in comparison to first-year students had significantly lower values of average scores in the domains of communication and knowledge.

Conclusion: The obtained results of our study, in addition to the scientific one, also have professional significance, because pedagogical implications can be created based on them, as a basis for improving the existing content of clinical training in nursing studies.

References

1. Stevenson JE, Israelsson J, Nilsson GC, Petersson GI, Bath PA. Recording signs of deterioration in acute patients: the documentation of vital signs within electronic health records in patients who suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest. Health Informatics J. 2016;22(1):21-33. doi: 10.1177/1460458214530136.

2. Eddahchouri Y, Koeneman M, Plokker M, Brouwer E, van de Belt TH, van Goor H, Bredie SJ. Low compliance to a vital sign safety protocol on general hospital wards: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;115:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103849.

3. Kamio T, Kajiwara A, Iizuka Y, Shiotsuka J, Sanui M. Frequency of vital sign measurement among intubated patients in the general ward and nurses' attitudes toward vital sign measurement. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:575-81. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S179033.

4. Alshehry AS, Cruz JP, Bashtawi MA, Almutairi KO, Tumala RB. Nursing students’ knowledge, competence and attitudes towards vital signs monitoring during clinical practice. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30(5-6):664-75. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15586.

5. Leonard MM, Kyriacos U. Student nurses’ recognition of early signs of abnormal vital sign recordings. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(9):e11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.04.013.

6. Alamri MS, Almazan JU. Barriers of physical assessment skills among nursing students in Arab Peninsula.  Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018;12(3):58-66.

7. Cooper SJR, Cant RP, Sparkes LM. Respiratory rate records: the repeated rate? J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(9-10):1236-8. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12234.

8. Ansell H, Meyer A, Thompson S. Why don't nurses consistently take patient respiratory rates? Br J Nurs. 2014;23(8):414-8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.8.414.

9. Mok W, Wang W, Cooper S, Ang EN, Liaw SY. Attitudes towards vital signs monitoring in the detection of clinical deterioration: scale development and survey of ward nurses. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27(3):207-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv019.

10. Prgomet M, Cardona-Morrell M, Nicholson M, Lake R, Long J, Westbrook J, et al. Vital signs monitoring on general wards: clinical staff perceptions of current practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring technology. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(4):515-21. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw062.

11. Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, Avishai-Yitshak A, Bryan A, Klein WMP, et al. The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2016;35(11):1178-88. doi: 10.1037/hea0000387.

12. Gawronski O, Biagioli V, Dall'oglio I, Cecchetti C, Ferro F, Tiozzo E, et al. Attitudes and practices towards vital signs monitoring on paediatric wards: cross-validation of the Ped-V scale. J Pediatr Nurs. 2022;65:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.03.009.

13. Kourkouta L, Papathanasiou IV. Communication in nursing practice. Mater Sociomed. 2014;26(1):65-7. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.65-67.

14. Xie J, Ding S, Wang C, Liu A. An evaluation of nursing students' communication ability during practical clinical training. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(8):823-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.011. (naveden je korigovan redosled brojeva referenci („14”) i („15”)).

15. Liu JE, Mok E, Wong T, Xue L, Xu B. Evaluation of an integrated communication skills training program for nurses in cancer care in Beijing, China. Nurs Res. 2007;56(3):202-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000270030.82736.8c.

16. Tijanić M, Đuranović D, Rudić R, Milović Lj. Zdravstvena nega i savremeno sestrinstvo. Beograd: Naučna KMD; 2001. (potrebno je proveriti godinu izdavanja)

17. Cherry PG, Jones CP. Attitudes of nursing staff towards a Modified Early Warning System. Br J Nurs. 2015;24(16):812-8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.16.812.

18. van Graan AC, Scrooby B, Bruin Y. Recording and interpretation of vital signs in a selected private hospital in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020;12:100199.doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100199.

19. Padilla RM, Mayo AM. Clinical deterioration: a concept analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(7-8):1360-8. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14238.

20. Mok WQ, Wang W, Liaw SY. Vital signs monitoring to detect patient deterioration: an integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015;21 Suppl 2:91-8. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12329.

21. Kelly C. Respiratory rate 1: why measurement and recording are crucial. Nursing  Times 2018;114(4):23-4.

22. Philip K, Richardson R, Cohen M. Staff perceptions of respiratory rate measurement in a general hospital. Br J Nurs. 2013;22(10):570-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.10.570.

23. Flenady T, Dwyer T, Applegarth J. Accurate respiratory rates count: So should you! Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2017;20(1):45-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2016.12.003.

24. Brekke IJ, Puntervoll LH, Pedersen PB, Kellett J, Brabrand M. The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210875.

25. Soong JTY, Soni N. Circulatory shock. Medicine. 2013;41(2):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2012.11.012.

26. Storm-Versloot MN, Verweij L, Lucas C, Ludikhuize J, Goslings JC, Legemate DA, et al. Clinical relevance of routinely measured vital signs in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014;46(1):39-49. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12048.

27. Hogan J. Why don't nurses monitor the respiratory rates of patients? Br J Nurs. 2006;15(9):489-92. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.9.21087.

Published
2023/10/12
Section
ORIGINAL ARTICLE