INCIDENTAL FINDING OF CONTRALATERAL BREAST CANCER IN CONTRALATERAL PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY SPECIMEN: A CASE REPORT

  • Dimitrije Kosovac Specialist Practice for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery "Kosovac", Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
  • Branko Suđecki Clinic for Burns, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia,
  • Olivera Kosovac Specialist Practice for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery "Kosovac", Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
  • Marko Jevtić Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
  • Gordana Pupić Beo-lab Laboratory for Pathohistological and Cytological Diagnostics, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
Keywords: breast cancer, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, case report

Abstract


Introduction/Aim: Prophylactic mastectomy may be performed in women with high genetic or familial risk, or unilaterally alongside therapeutic mastectomy. Although malignancy is not expected in prophylactic specimens, incidental contralateral breast cancer (CBC) may alter management and prognosis. The aim of this study is to present a clinical case of the incidental finding of contralateral breast carcinoma (CBC) in a tissue specimen obtained through contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in a 46-year-old patient who had been initially diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the opposite breast.

Case report: We report a 46-year-old woman initially diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the right breast. After declining adjuvant radiotherapy, she opted for bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with direct-to-implant reconstruction. Histopathology confirmed DCIS with a focal invasive component in the right breast and unexpectedly revealed three microscopic focuses of DCIS in the contralateral breast, alongside fibrocystic changes and atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Discussion: The annual incidence of CBC is estimated at 0.5-0.75%. Examination of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) specimens may uncover high-risk lesions (ADH, ALH, LCIS) or, rarely, invasive carcinoma. Such findings highlight the diagnostic potential of CPM and the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation when selecting candidates for risk-reducing surgery.

Conclusion: Although CPM does not consistently improve overall survival, it can contribute to individualized risk reduction, simplified surveillance, and reduced anxiety in selected patients. This case underscores its diagnostic value in detecting occult contralateral malignancy and reinforces the need for personalized surgical planning within a multidisciplinary framework.

 

 

 

References

Rosic N, Santric Milicevic M, Vujetic M, Brankovic B, Miltenovic S, Anton A. Five-year prevalence of breast cancer among women in Belgrade. Eur J Public Health. 2025;35(Suppl 4):ckaf161.1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1248 PMID: null

Ghosh K, Hartmann LC. Current status of prophylactic mastectomy. Oncol Williston Park N. 2002;16(10):1319–25; discussion 1325, 1329–30, 1332. PMID: 12435203

Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, Blair SL, Burstein HJ, Cyr A, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2017;15(4):433–51. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0044 PMID: 28404755

Kim SJ, Arneja J, Christensen RAG, Anderson GM, Brooks JD. Trends in contralateral breast cancer and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy from 2009 to 2016. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025;11:55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00763-6 PMID: 40517156

Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2020 Apr;18(4):452–78. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0016 PMID: 32259783

Alaofi RK, Nassif MO, Al-Hajeili MR. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer: Review of the literature. Avicenna J Med. 2018;8(3):67–77. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.AJM_21_18 PMID: 30090744

Boccardo C, Gentilini O. Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in patients with sporadic breast cancer. Benefits and hazards. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 July 1;42(7):913–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.04.054

Xiong Z, Yang L, Deng G, Huang X, Li X, Xie X, et al. Patterns of Occurrence and Outcomes of Contralateral Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER Data. J Clin Med. 2018;7(6):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060133 PMID: 29857526

King TA, Gurevich I, Sakr R, Patil S, Stempel M, Morrow M. Occult malignancy in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182125b26 PMID: 21372684

Kurian AW, Canchola AJ, Ma CS, Clarke CA, Gomez SL. Magnitude of reduction in risk of second contralateral breast cancer with bilateral mastectomy in patients with breast cancer: Data from California, 1998 through 2015. Cancer. 2020;126(5):958–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32618 PMID: 31750934

Reiner AS, Lynch CF, Sisti JS, John EM, Brooks JD, Bernstein L, et al. Hormone receptor status of a first primary breast cancer predicts contralateral breast cancer risk in the WECARE study population. Breast Cancer Res BCR. 2017;19(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0874-x PMID: 28724391

Published
2025/11/06
Section
Case report