Weber’s Understanding of Epistemological and Methodological Foundations of Social Sciences and Sociology
Abstract
Since the formation of sociology as a separate science during the first half of the 19th century, some of the most important questions that sociologists have attempted to answer have been what the cognitive possibilities of sociology as a science are and what the most adequate methods of research that it should use are. In this work, we will critically analyze how Max Weber, one of the most significant sociologists, understood the cognitive possibilities of sociology and what method, according to him, sociology as a social science should use. Firstly, we will examine how the intellectual climate of the second half of the 19th century influenced his understanding of scientific methodology in a broader sense. Then, Weber’s vision of the basic epistemological characteristics of social sciences and his methodological-theoretical determination of sociology will be presented.
References
Вебер, М. (1976). Привреда и друштво I. Београд: Просвета.
Bendix, R. (1977). Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Los Angeles: University of California Press Ltd.
Benton, T. (1984). The Rise and Fall of Structural Marxism: Althusser and His Influence. London: Macmillan Education.
Betsi, K. (2010). Poststrukturalizam: Sasvim kratak uvod. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Bruun, H. H. (2016). Sciences, Values and Politics in Max Weber's Methodology. London: Taylor & Francis.
Calhoun, C. (1995). Critical Social Theory: Culture, History, and the Challenge of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Collins, R. (1986). Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1982). Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.
Đurić, M. (1964). Sociologija Maksa Vebera. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.
Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gylfason, T. (2001). Natural resources, education, and economic development. European Economic Review, 45(4), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00127-1
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Freedom House. (2023). Freedom in the World. Retrieved November 8, 2023, from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/FIW_World_2023_DigtalPDF.pdf
Hammerslay, M. (2018). The Radicalism of Ethnomethodology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Marks, K. i Engels, F. (2009). Manifest komunističke partije. Beograd: Centar za liberterske studije.
Marks, K. (1969). Prilog kritici političke ekonomije. Beograd: Kultura.
Marks, K. (2020). Teze o Fojerbahu. Revolucionarni savez rada Srbije. https://savezrada.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/karl-marks-tezeo-fojerbahu-1845.pdf
Milić, V. (1965). Sociološki metod. Beograd: Nolit.
Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge Classics.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ringer, F. (1997). Max Weber’s Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rosing, H. (2018). Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong about the World -- and Why Things Are Better than You Think. London: MacMillan Publishers.
Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1958). The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism. Illinois: The Free Press.
Weber, M. (1959). The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. Illinois: The Free Press.
Weber, M. (1967). Ancient Judeism. Illinois: The Free Press.
Weber, M. (1989а). Metodologija društvenih nauka. Zagreb: Globus.
Weber, M. (1989б). Protestanska etika i duh kapitalizma. Sarajevo: Svjetlost.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: