Comic Relief and Social Subversion in "Hamlet"
Abstract
In classical poetics, tragedy is defined as the representation of a serious and complete action, traditionally characterized by the exclusion of comic episodes and characters. William Shakespeare, however, disrupts this convention by integrating comic scenes into the very structure of tragic discourse. This paper argues that comic relief in tragedy does not serve a single, uniform function; in Hamlet, it operates as a complex dramaturgical and ideological device. Comic episodes do not merely temper tragic intensity; rather, they open a discursive space in which social hierarchies and mechanisms of institutional control are articulated and critically examined. An analysis of scenes involving Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Osric, and the gravediggers reveals a dynamic hierarchy of comic functions, ranging from courtly comedy aligned with the stabilization of the existing order to carnivalesque forms of laughter that challenge class distinctions and established structures of authority. The theoretical framework of this study is grounded in Bakhtin’s concept of carnivalization and enriched by insights from New Historicism and psychoanalytic theories of humor. This approach enables comic relief in Hamlet to be interpreted as an integral component of the dramatic structure—one that both deepens tragic meaning and exposes the play’s internal ideological contradictions.
References
Андрејевић, А. (2010). Настанак драмске књижевне форме у антици и њен утицај на енглеску ренесансну драму. Зборник радова Филозофског факултета, 40, 117–127.
Андрејевић, А. (2013). Генеза британске драме у средњем веку. Баштина, 34, 45–66.
Требјешанин, Ж. (2009). Фројдово завештање. Београд: ИП „Жарко Албуљ”.
Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. G. (2005). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage learning.
Alden, R. M. (1914). The use of comic material in the tragedy of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 13(2), 281–298.
Aristotel. (2008). O pesničkoj umetnosti. Beograd: Dereta.
Attardo, S. (Ed.). (2014). Encyclopedia of Humor Studies. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Baldick, C. (2015). The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, A., & Royle, N. (2004). An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Bristol, M. D. (1985). Carnival and Theater Plebian Culture and the Structure of Authority in Renaissance England. London: Routledge.
Burzyńska, A., & Markowski, M. P. (2009). Književne teorije XX veka (s poljskog prevela I. Đokić). Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Carlson, M. (1984). Theories of the Theatre: A Historical and Critical Survey, from the Greeks to the Present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Castle, G. (2007). The Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Cook, J. W. (2006). Encyclopedia of Renaissance Literature. New York: Facts on File, Inc.
Coyle, M., Garside, P., Kelsall, M., & Peck, J. (1993). Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism. Gale: Routledge.
Critchley, S. (2002). On Humour. New York: Routledge.
Dobie, A. (2012). Theory into Practice: An Introduction to Literary Criticism. Boston: Wadsworth.
Draudt, M. (2002). The comedy of Hamlet. Atlantis, XXIV(2), 85–107.
Dryden, J. (1889). An Essay of Dramatic Poesy (Edited with notes by T. Arnold). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Frojd, S. (1960). Dosetka i njen odnos prema nesvesnom. Novi Sad: Matica srpska.
Greenblatt, S. J. (1988). Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Grinblat, S. (2006). Vil iz Stratforta: kako je Šekspir postao Šekspir. Beograd: PortaLibris.
Kaur, S., & Choudhary, H. (2024). Locating the elements of comic relief in Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet. International Journal of Trends in English Language and Literature, 5(1), 46–64.
Knowles, R. (Ed.). (1998). Shakespeare and Carnival: After Bakhtin. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Marsh, N. (1998). Shakespeare: The Tragedies. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Minoa, Ž. (2008). Istorija samoubistva. Novi Sad: Brodel.
Montrose, L. A. (1996). The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morreall, J. (2009). Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Nason, A. H. (1906). Shakespeare’s use of comedy in tragedy. The Sewanee Review, 14(1), 28–37.
Neill, M. (2005). Issues of Death: Mortality and Identity in English Renaissance Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Perišić, I. (2012). Uvod u teoriju smeha. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Popović, T. (2007). Rečnik književnih termina. Beograd: Logos Art.
Pul, E. (2011). Tragedija: sasvim kratak uvod. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Ristivojević, M. (2009). Bahtin o karnevalu. Etnoantropološki problemi, 4 (3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v4i3.10
Schwyzer, P. (2007). Archaeologies of English Renaissance Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shipley, J. T. (1943). Dictionary of World Literature. New York: Philosophical Library.
Snyder, S. (2019). The Comic Matrix of Shakespeare’s Tragedies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Šekspir, V. (1966). Hamlet. Beograd: Kultura.
Watson, R. N. (1994). The Rest Is Silence: Death as Annihilation in the English Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: