European identity – a lot of water will pass

  • Uroš V. Šuvaković University of Priština with temporary head-office in Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy
Keywords: constitutional patriotism, supranational identity, European Union, European identity,

Abstract


The basic problem that the process of Euro integrations faces today is the absence of the European identity. There are ideas how it could be built, on what it should be based, but the basic problem is the EU has give up in a great extent from the real European values – the ideals like freedom, equality, solidarity, social justice, etc. Human rights are the European achievement, but a distinctive, therefore identity difference between the European and the Anglo-American interpretation is that the European variant guaranteed social-economic rights, which was actually a concretization of the great ideal of solidarity. Today, with prevailing ideology of globalism, just this element of human rights has been brutally waded, a part of the European identity with it. A similar situation is with what the Europeans consider the greatest achievement of the EU – free movement of people, goods and capital. Free movement of people is questioned by building barbed wires and creation of a new аntemurale сhristianitatis, even in Islamic states, far away from the Schengen Area that is proclaimed untouchable. Moreover, all those people swarming to the Europe actually have close connections with it – they originate from former European colonies, brutally exploited by their metropolises for decades and centuries. Not only that, but recently their new “Europeanization” has been attempted through the initialization of the “Arab Spring”, which resulted with increase of the Islamic fundamentalism, disintegration of certain Arab states and tribal war in them, increase of terrorism and, of course, migrants from those areas. Although it would be justified to try to return the evil gotten to them at least partly, by refusing to accept the miserable the Europe gives the mortal strike to some of the main values that are considered its identity characteristics – free movement of people and solidarity.

All this, actually, indicates on the absence of the European identity consciousness. There is no clearly defined content of the idea of the Euroidentity, nor there is consciousness of it with the citizens of the EU. The citizens of the EU are still more French, Englishmen, Germans, Italians, Spaniards, Poles, Czechs rather than the Europeans. Their Europeanism exists only on the level of usefulness and efficacy, therefore, the prediction is that the model of the EU as an international organizationsui generiswill be kept for a long time, while identities in future will be tied for (European) nations.

Author Biography

Uroš V. Šuvaković, University of Priština with temporary head-office in Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy

Department of Sociology

Vice Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy

Associate Professor

References

Гиденс, Е. (2009). Европа у глобалном добу. Београд: CLIO.

Голубовић, З. (2007). „Идентитет”. У: А. Мимица, М. Богдановић (прир.), Социолошки речник. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.

Гофман, Е. (2009). Стигма: забелешке о опхођењу са нарушеним идентитетом. Нови Сад: Mediterran publishing.

Малешевић, М. (2007). „Хришћански идентитет секуларне Европе”. Гласник Етнографског института САНУ LV(1), 9–28.

Марковић, Д. Ж. (2010). „Актуелна методолошка проучавања социјално-политичких односа глобалног друштва”. Зборник радова Филозофског факултета у Приштини XL/2010, 279–290.

Марковић, Д. Ж. (2013). Глобализација и идентитети. Београд: Српска академија образовања.

Митровић, Љ. (2006). „Бурдијеова критика неолибералне филозофије развоја, мита о мондијализацији и новој Европи (Пледоаје за обнову критичке социологије)”. У: М. Немањић, И. Спасић (прир.), Наслеђе Пјера Бурдијеа: поуке и надахнућа. Београд: Институт за филозофију и друштвену теорију, Завод за проучавање културног развитка.

Ракић, Б. (2009). За Европу је потребно време: о преурањеном покушају успостављања европске политичке интеграције. Београд: Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду – Центар за издаваштво и информисање.

Ракић, Б. и Вучић, М. (2014). Недогматски о европској интеграцији. Београд: Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду – Центар за издаваштво и информисање.

Чомски, Н. (2014). „Брисел је кривац за колапс демократије”. НИН, 6. фебруар.

Шуваковић, У. (2014). „Идентитети – етнички, национални и наднационални”. У: З. Милошевић, Ж. Ђурић (прир.) (Дез)интеграција држава и идентитет. Београд: Институт за политичке студије.

Шуваковић, У. (2014). Транзиција: прилог социолошком проучавању друштвених промена. Косовска Митровица: Филозофски факултет Универзитета у Приштини.

Bhargava, R. (2014). “How Secular is European Secularism?”. European Societies 16 (3): 329–336. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2014.916335

Centlivres, Р. (1981). Regional Identity and Perspectives.Berne: Haupt.

Delhey J., Deutschmann E., Graf T.,Richter K. (2014). “Measuring the Europeanization of Everyday Life: Three New Indices and an Empirical Application”. European Societies 16 (3): 355–377. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2014.904916

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (2008). Eseji o Europi. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Hume, D. (1978). On Human Nature. London: Fontana Books.

Kohli, М. (2000). “The Battlegrounds Of European Identity”. European Societies 2 (2): 113–137. DOI: 10.1080/146166900412037.

Lianos. М. (2015). „Europe, Dead in the water”. European Societies 17 (4): 401–403. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2015.1092210

Pichler, F. (2009). “Cosmopolitan Europe”. European Societies 11 (1): 3–24. DOI: 10.1080/14616690802209697

Sjursen, H. (2012). “A Certain Sense Of Europe?”. European Societies 14 (4): 502–521, DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2012.724576

Suvakovic, U. (2015). “Orientation towards EU Integration and Existence of Euroidentity – Serbian Students Attitudes”. Serbian Political Thought (2), 61–79.

Published
2015/12/08
Section
Original Scientific Paper