Lightning rod on the church: Heritage as faith in a meaningful past

  • Milan M. Popadić University of Belgrad, Faculty of Philosophy
Keywords: meaningful past, „heritage catechism”, heritology, heritage,

Abstract


In the paper Fabricating Heritage David Lowenthal distinguishes between history and heritage, and says that history seeks to convince by truth, and succumbs to falsehood, while heritage exaggerates and omits, candidly invents and frankly forgets, and thrives on ignorance and error. As Lowenthal states, heritage uses historical traces and tells historical tales, but these tales and traces are stitched into fables closed to critical scrutiny, because it is not erudition but catechism – not checkable fact but credulous allegiance. Hence the Lowenthal’s conclusion: Heritage is not a testable or even plausible version of our past; it is a declaration of faith in that past.  Starting from these positions, this paper will examine the relationship between the scientific approach to the problem of heritage and heritage processes independent of institutionalized protection system (“heritage catechism”). What we want to preserve is a specific quality, the quality of testimonial nature. It is the quality of the aforesaid forms and contents that have overcome past in order to testify, hence to fully inform us of the reality from which they originated and while testifying about that reality, they synchronously testify about those who care about them nowadays. Although seemingly paradoxical, like a lightning rod in the church, this paper defends the thesis that for the lasting care for heritage, and thus for a comprehensive understanding of the meaning of the past, synergy of scientific and “catechistic” approach to heritage is necessary.

References

Ahlwardt, P. (1747). Bronto-Theologie, oder Vernünftige und theologische Betrachtungen über den Blitz und Donner, wodurch der Mensch zur wahren Erkenntniß Gottes und seiner Vollkommenheiten, wie auch zu tugendhaften Leben und Wandel geführet werden kan. Greifswalde – Leipzig.

Asman, A. (2002). Rad na nacionalnom pamćenju: kratka istorija nemačke ideje obrazovanja. Beograd: Nolit, Čigoja štampa.

Асман, Ј. (2011). Култура памћења. Београд: Просвета.

Bauzinger, H. (2002). Etnologija. Beograd: XX vek.

Briet, S. (1951). Qu'est-ce que la documentation? Paris: Éditions documentaires, industrielles et techniques.

Brown, M. F. (2005). Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property. Journal of Cultural Property 12 (1), 40–61.

Булатовић, Д. (2005). „Баштинство или о незаборављању”. Крушевачки зборник 11, 7–20.

Chastel, A. (1988). „Pojam baštine”. Pogledi 18 (3–4), 709–723.

Cohen, I. B, R. Schofield (1952). Did Diviš Erect the First European Protective Lightning Rod, and Was His Invention Independent? Isis 43, (4), 358–364.

Cohen, I. B. (1996). Benjamin Franklin’s Science. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Ћирковић, С. (1982) „Предговор”. У: Стојан Новаковић, Историја и традиција (стр. VII–XXI). Београд: Српска књижевна задруга.

Dalamber, Ž. (1955). Uvodna rasprava u Enciklopediju, Beograd: Kultura.

Деспотовић, М. (2010). Развој курикулума у стручном образовању. Београд: Филозофски факултет.

Dvořák, M. (1916). Katechismus der Denkmalpflege. Vienna: Kunsthistorisches Institut der K. K. Zentral-Kommission für Denkmalpflege – Verlag von Julius Bard.

Dvořák, M. (1988). Katekizam zaštite spomenika. Pogledi, časopis za kritičku teoriju društva i kulture 18 (3–4), 793–820.

Фуко, М. (1998). Археологија знања, Београд: Плато.

Hawking, S (2009). A Stubbornly Persistent Illusion: The Essential Scientific Works of Albert Einstein. Philadelphia: Running Press.

Heilbron, J. L. (1979). Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics. Berkley: University of California Press.

Hujer, K. (1952). Father Procopius Diviš — The European Franklin. Isis 43 (4), 351–357.

Kater, M. (1997). Das Ahnenerbe der SS 1935–1945. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturpolitik des Dritten Reiches. Munich: Walter de Gruyter.

Коен, М., Нејгел, Е. (2006). Увод у логику и научни метод, Београд: Јасен.

Lowenthal, D. (1998). Fabricating Heritage. History and Memory 10 (1), 7–8.

Новаковић, С. (1880–1881). Народне традиције и критичка историја (смрт краља Стефана Дечанског и цара Уроша). Прилог к процени извора српске историје. Отаџбина IV–V, 481–490.

Malraux, A. (1951). Les voix du silence. Paris: Gallimard

Martel, J. (2010). Beatriče i Vergilije. Beograd: Geopoetika.

Ovidije, P. (1991). Metamorfoze. Beograd: Dereta.

Popadić, M. (2014). Vreme prošlo u vremenu sadašnjem: Uvod u studije baštine. Beograd: CMiH.

Poulot, D. (1988). The Birth of Heritage: ’le moment Guizot’. Oxford Art Journal 11 (2), 40–56

Quincy, Q. de (1801–1820). Encyclopedie methodique, Architecture (Tome Second). Paris.

Riegl, A (2006/1903). „Moderni kult spomenika, njegova bit, njegov postanak”, u: M. Špikić (prir.), Anatomija povjesnog spomenika (стр. 349–412), Zagreb: Institut za povijest umjetnosti.

Škreb, Z. (1976). Studij književnosti. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Šola, T. (2003). Eseji o muzejima i njihovoj teoriji: prema kibernetičkom muzeju. Zagreb: Hrvatski nacionalni komitet ICOM.

Uman, M. A. (2001). The Lightning Discharge, New York: Courier Dover Publications.

Published
2015/12/08
Section
Original Scientific Paper