EFFICIENCY OF DOMESTIC SYSTEM OF EMPLOYEES CLAIMS PROTECTION IN EVENT OF AN EMPLOYER BANKRUPTCY
Abstract
In this paper, the author analyzes ways of protections of employees' claims against employer in bankruptcy proceedings. The first part of the paper discusses various protection modalities that are applied individually or in combination with other means, all with the aim of providing a better safeguard framework for employees involved in bankruptcy proceedings. The central part of the paper is discussing the effectiveness of the domestic system, which is measured by the degree of settlement of claims of employees in bankruptcy proceedings, i.e. the adopted claims before the Solidarity Fund. The paper starts from the assumption that the employee protection system for outstanding claims would be significantly more effective if the employees were more familiar with the functioning of the Solidarity Fund and that the organization of the Fund's functioning is different. In order to achieve the desired goal, it is necessary to place protection in a broader context, which implies the harmony of the institutes of labor and bankruptcy law. As this is not the case in Serbia, the author points to a number of practical problems that arise as a result of this, and which have been identified through an analysis of the work reports of this institution published since its establishment.
One of the problems employees and the professional service of the Fund are facing with are unclear legal conditions set for the exercise of rights. In addition to that, potential beneficiaries of the Fund's assets are not adequately familiar with its work, which is a basic prerequisite for the successful exercise of their rights. Confirmation for our stand, we have received in an anonymously conducted internet survey which showed that a vast number of respondents were unaware of the existence of Solidarity Fund. The length of the proceedings before the Fund is not related to the quality of work of the professional service, which has been significantly improved by automatization of the entire procedure, but rather by the insufficient resources of the Fund that are postponing the adoption of the requests. Therefore, it is proposed that encouraging other forms of funding could directly reduce the State's share of the funding and thus ensure better financial stability of the Fund. Finally, on the basis of a critical review of the current regime, it is concluded that the labor-law mechanisms of protection of employees are of limited reach, and that in that regard it should be considered if they could be extended with adequate adjustment to those employers who did not file a formal bankruptcy procedure.
References
Betten L. (1993). International Labour Law: Selected Issues. Deventer-Boston: Kluwer Law International.
Bailly P. (2013). Les droits des salariés en matière de redressement judiciaire et liquidation de biens. Dostupno na: layer.fr/5438461-Les-droits-des-salaries-en-matiere-de-redressement-judiciaire-et-liquidation-de-biens-patrick-tillie-avocat-au-barreau-de-lille.html (26.8.2021).
Blanpain R. (2002). European Labour Law. The Hague. London. New York: Kluwer Law International.
Finch V. (2009). Corporate Insolvency Law: Perspectives and Principles, Cambrige. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Golubović V. (2010). Evazija doprinosa i mere za sprečavanje. Pravo i privreda 1-3/2010.
Hallet N. (2019). The problem of wage theft, Yale Law & Policy Review, 93 (2).
Janis S. (2008). Recognizing workers’ economic contributions: the treаtment of еmployee and pension claims during company insolvency: A comparative Study of 62 Jurisdictions. Dоступно на: https://www.iiiglobal.org/sites/default/files/105_Recognizing_Workers_Economic_Contributions.pdf (26.8.2021).
Kovačević Lj. (2005). Usklađivanje domaćeg prava sa Direktivama Evropske Unije putem putem odredaba novog Zakona o radu. Radni odnosi – zbornik radova (ur. Bobar K.) Beograd: Glosarijum.
Kimhi O. (2015). Getting more than Justice on Paper: Bankruptcy Priorities and the Crisis of Unpaid Wages. Hofstra Law Review 44(1).
Kennedy R. F. (1955). Statutory Liens In Bankruptcy. Dostupno na: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2312&context=mlr (20.12.2020).
Kimhi О. & Arno Doebert А. (2015). Bankruptcy Law as a Balancing System: Lessons from a comapartive analyisis of the intersection between Labour and Bankruptcy Law American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review 2(23).
Mucciarelli M. F. (2017). Employee Insolvency Priorities and Employment Protection in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society 44 (2).
Murcia G. J. (2016). Las garantías del salario ante la insolvencia de la empresa en la jurisprudencia delribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea. Revista International y Comparada de Relaciones Laborales y Derecho del Empleo, 4(2).
Marjanović M. (2012). Određeni pravni aspekti zaštite prava zaposlenih u postupcima privatizacije i stečaja. Pravo i privreda 4-6/2012.
Obradović J. (2016). Prava zaposlenih pred Fondom solidarnosti. Zaštita prava iz oblasti rada-zbornik radova (red. Ivošević Z.) Beograd: Glosarijum.
Obradović J. (2013). Stanje i problemi zaštite prava zaposelnih pred Fondom solidarnosti. Zaštita prava iz oblasti rada - zbornik radova (red. Ivošević Z.) Beograd: Glosarijum.
Popović Ajnšpiler G. (2013). Sporovi iz radnog odnosa pred privrednim sudovima. Zaštita prava u oblasti rada-zbornik radova (red. Ivošević Z.). Beograd: Glosarijum.
Radulović B. (2014). Stečaj u Srbiji – činjenice, zablude i nenameravane posledice. Ekonomska politika Srbije u 2014: Mogućnost privrednog rasta u uslovima reformi i fisklane konsolidacije (ur. Šoškić B., Arsić M.). Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Radović V. (2018). Stečajno pravo-knjiga prva, Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Szyszczak E. (2000). EC Labour Law. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Slijepčević D. (2010). Pravni položaj zaposlenih u stečajnom postupku. Pravni informator 6/2010.
Todorović I. (2008). Pravne posledice usvajanja plana reorganizacije. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 263. Tucker E. (2008). Shareholder and Director Liability for Unpaid Workers' Wages in Canada: From Condition of Granting Limited Liability to Exceptional Remedy. Law and History Review 26(1).
Višekruna A. (2013). Pravni položaj zaposlenih u stečajnom postupku, Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Višekruna A., Ćalić Rajić J. (2019). Zaposleni kao privilegovani poverioci u stečajnom postpku. Vek i po regulisanja stečaja u Srbiji (ur. Šarkić N., Radović V., Ajnšpiler Popović G.) Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo.
Višekruna A. (2016). Odgovornost direktora za neisplaćena potraživanja zaposlenih u slučaju stečaja poslodavca. Strani pravni život 60(3).
Wood P. (2007). Principles of International Insolvency. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Yemin E., Arturo S. Bronstein S. A. (1991). The protection of workers’ claims in the event of the employer’s insolvency. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Autori koji objavljuju u ovom časopisu pristaju na sledeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) pre ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka.