Soil Moisture Induced Genotype-by-Environment Interaction for Root Volume of Upland Rice
Sažetak
Sixteen rice genotypes comprising established cultivars, recent releases and breeding lines were established in the greenhouse under different moisture levels, obtained from a combination of amount and number of times of moisture application to study genotype-by-environment (GE) of root volume (RV) and also probe into the level of moisture imposition that would be adequate for screening of genotypes for response to moisture stress. Across the simulated environments, WAB 880-9-32-1-1-12-HB (G1) had the most root volume of 8.71cm3 while ITA 257 had the least (4.89cm3). Genotypes (G) accounted for a significant 10.6% of the total sum of squares with environment (E) and GE capturing equally significant 79.5 and 10.4 percent respectively. The GGE biplot clustered the environments into two groups with ITA 321 (G9) being the best for RV in environment E2 (100% moisture applied once a week), E5 (75% moisture applied twice per week) and E10 cluster (rainfed). WAB 880-9-32-1-1-12-HB (G1) recorded the best RV under environments with limited moisture but was also less stable and recorded grain production (13.5g/plant) close to the highest mean from ITA 150 (G3) (16.0g/plant) and IRAT 170 (G15) (14.1g/plant). Environments were generally positively correlated with vegetative and yield traits but E2, E5; E7, E8, E9 (50% of requirement) and E10 are highly discriminating and would be appropriate for discarding genotypes with poor RV. E1, E3, E4 and E6 were more representative of variable moisture condition and appropriate for selection of genotypes for RV within the overall goal of developing drought tolerant rice.
Reference
Acuna, T.L.B. and Wade. L. J.(2012): Genotype × environment interactions for root depth of wheat.FieldCropsRes.137:117–125.
Africa Rice Center (WARDA)/FAO/SAA (2008): NERICA: the New Rice for Africa – a Compedium. E. A. Somado, R. G. Guei and S. O. Keya (eds). Cotonou, Benin: Africa Rice Center (WARDA); Rome, Italy: FAO; Tokyo, Japan:Sasakawa Africa Association. 210pp.
Anonymous.(1988).Standard Evaluation System for Rice. 3rd Ed., IRRI, Philippine, pp: 54.
Asch, F., Dingkuhn, M., Sow, A., and Audebert, A. (2005): Drought-induced changes in rooting patterns and assimilate partitioning between root and shoot in upland rice. Field Crops Res. 93: 223-236.
Boonjung H.and Fukai, S. (1996): Effects of soil water deficit at different growth stages on rice growth and yield under upland conditions: 2. Phenology, biomass production and yield. Field Crop Res 48: 47-55.
Bose, L. K., Nagaraju, M and Singh, O. N. (2012): Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis of lowland rice genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 57(1): 1-8.
Bouman B. A. M., Xiaoguang Y., Huaqi W., Zhimin W., Junfang Z. (2006): Performance of aerobic rice varieties under irrigated conditions in North China. Field Crop Res 97: 53-63.
Cairns, J. E, Acuña B. T .L., Simborio F. A., Dimayuga G., Lakshmi Praba M., Leung H., Torres R., Lafitte H. R.(2009): Identification of deletion mutants with improved performance under water-limited environments in rice (Oryza sativa L.).Field Crops Res. 114: 159 -168.
Fukai S. and Cooper M. (1995).Development of drought - resistance cultivars using physiomorphological traits in rice. Field Crops Res. 40: 67- 86.
Gauch, H. G. (Jnr) (2006)Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:1488–1500. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193.
Gowda, V. R. P., Henry, A., Yamauchi, A., Shashidar, H. E., and Serraj, R. (2011): Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res. 122: 1 – 13.
Kamoshita, A., Babu, R. C. Boophati, M. N. Fukai, S. (2008): Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of drought-resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crops Res. 109: 1–23.
Kato Y., Kamoshita A., Yamagishi J. and Abe J. (2006): Growth of three rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars under upland conditions with different levels of water supply: 2. Grain yield. Plant Prod Sci 9: 435-445.
Kondo, M., Pablico, P P., Aragones, D. V., Agbisit, R., Abe, J., Morita, S. and Courtois, B. (2003): Genotypic and environmental variations in root morphology in rice genotypes under upland field conditions. Plant and Soil, 255: 189 – 200.
Nassir A. L. and Adewusi K. M. (2015): Genotype x Environment analysis of root traits of upland rice (Oryza sativa) in a drought prone tropical rainfed ecology. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 92 (1): 16 - 26.
Nassir, A. L., Ariyo, O. J. (2006): Plant character correlations and path analysis of grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa). J. of Genet.and Breed. 60: 161-172.
Price, A. H., Steele, K. A., Moore, B. J., Jones, R. G. W. (2002): Upland rice grown in soil-filled chambers and exposed to contrasting water deficit regimes II.Mapping quantitative trait loci for root morphology and distribution. Field Crops Res. 76: 25-43.
Samonte S.O.P.B., Wilson, L. T., McClung, A. M. and Medley, J. C. (2005): Targeting Cultivars onto Rice Growing Environments Using AMMI and SREG GGE Biplot Analyses. Crop Sci. 45:2414–2424.
Wang H., Siopongcob J., Wade L. J., and Yamauchi, A. (2009): Fractal analysis on root systems of rice plants in response to drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Bot. 65: 338–344.
Yan W., Hunt, L. A. Sheng, Q. and Szlavnics, Z. (2000): Cultivar Evaluation and Mega-Environment Investigation Based on the GGE Biplot.Crop Sci. 40:597–605.
Yan, W., Kang, M. S., Ma, B., Woods, S., and Cornelius, P. S. (2007): GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data.Crop Sci. 47:643–655. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374.
Zobel, R. W., Wright, M. J. and Gauch (Jr.) H. G. (1988): Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy J. 80, 388-393.