Economics of Row spacing and Integrated weed management in soybean

  • Olumide Samuel Daramola Federal University of Agriulture, Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria
  • Olusegun Rapheal Adeyemi Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria
  • Joseph Aremu Adigun Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria
  • Christopher Olu Adejuyigbe Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria

Abstract


High cost of cultivation and weed management is a major limiting factors to increased soybean productivity and net returns. Field experiments were conducted in 2016 and 2017 at the Teaching and Research Farm of Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta to evaluate the economic performance of different of row spacing and integrated weed management system in soybean. Three row spacings (50, 75 and 100 cm) as the main plot treatments and six weed control methods and a weedy check as sub-plot treatments were accommodated in a split-plot arrangement of randomized complete block design with three replications. There was significant reduction in weed biomass with reduction in row spacing from 100 to 75 and 50 cm in both years. Furthermore, cost of production, grain yield and gross profit increased with reduction in row spacing from 100 to 75 and 50 cm in both years. When planted with 50 cm row spacing, application of propaben or butachlor at 2.0 kg a.i (active ingredient)/ha each followed by (fb) supplementary hoe weeding (shw) at 6 weeks after sowing (WAS) resulted in the highest yield (2301-2484 kg/ha) and total revenue (2129-1972 $/ha). Conversely, three hoe weedings resulted in the highest yield (2155-2081 kg/ha) and total revenue (1848-1783 $/ha) for crops grown at wide (75 and 100 cm) row spacings. Despite the higher yield and revenue obtained with three hoe weedings for crops grown at 75 and 100 cm row spacing, however, the gross profit and benefit-cost ratio obtained was lower than those obtained with herbicides treatments applied alone or fb shw. In terms of profitability, soybean planted at 50 cm row spacing and treated with probaben at 2.0 kg a.i/ha fb shw gave the highest gross profit of $1479/ha. Increasing the number of hoe weeding to two or three times in soybean planted at narrow (50 cm) row spacing did not guarantee highest yield, but rather increased the cost of weed control. This study suggests that narrow row spacing (50 cm) and pre-emergence herbicides will help to reduce the number of hoe weedings and consequently high cost of production required for optimum yield, and increase profitability in soybean production.

Author Biographies

Olumide Samuel Daramola, Federal University of Agriulture, Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria
Department of Plant Physiology and Crop Production.
Olusegun Rapheal Adeyemi, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria
Department of Plant Physiology and Crop Production
Joseph Aremu Adigun, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria
Department of Plant Physiology and Crop Production
Christopher Olu Adejuyigbe, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria
Department of Soil Science

References

Adigun, J.A., & Lagoke, S.T.O. (2003). Weed control in transplanted rain and irrigated tomatoes in the Nigerian savanna. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science. 16, 23 – 29.

Adigun, J.A. (2005). Critical period of weed interference in rainfed and irrigated Tomatoes in the Nigerian savanna Agricultura tropica et subtropica 38(2), 73-79

Adigun, J.A., Adeyemi, O.R., Daramola, O.S., Odueme, P.U., & Fadeyi, O.J. (2017). Growth and yield performance of groundnut (Arachis hypogeae L.) as affected by row- spacing and weed control methods in the Nigerian forest–savannah transition zone Nigerian Journal of Ecology. 16(1), 22-35.

Bhagirath, S.C., Singarayer, K.F., Connor, J.F., & Rodolfo, G.C. (2016) Implications of narrow crop row spacing in managing weeds in mungbean (Vigna radiata). Crop protection 30, 1-4

Chauhan, B.S., & Johnson, D.E. (2010). Implications of narrow crop row spacing and delayed Echinochloa colona and Echinochloa crusgalli emergence for weed growth and crop yield loss in aerobic rice. Field Crops Res. 117, 177-182.

Chauhan, B.S., & Opeña, J. (2013). Implications of plant geometry and weed control options in designing a low-seeding seed-drill for dry seeded rice systems. Field Crops Research, 144, 225–231

Chikoye, D., Ellis-Jones, J., Riches, C., & Kanyomeka, L. (2007) Weed management in Africa: experiences, challenges and opportunities. XVI International Plant Protection Congress. (2007) 652-653

Cox, W.J., & Cherney, J.A. (2011). Growth and Yield Response of Soybean to Row Spacing and Seeding Rate. Agron. J. 103, 123-128.

Culpepper, A.S. (2006) Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol. 20, 277-281

Gouse, M., Jenifer, P., & Colin, T. (2006). Output and Labour Effects of GM Maize and Minimum Tillage in a Communal Area of Kwazulu-Natal. Journal of Development Perspectives. 2(2), 71-86.

Imoloame, E.O. (2014). The effects of different weed control methods on weed infestation, growth and yield of soybeans (Glycine max (L) Merrill) in the southern guinea savanna of Nigeria Agro search 14(2), 129-143

Jannink, J.I., Orf, J.H., Jordan, N.R., & Shaw, R.G. (2000). Index selection for weed suppressive ability in soybean. Crop Science. 40(4), 1087-1094

Joubert, J.C.N., & Jooste A.A.A. (2013). Comparative analysis of the different regions of South Africa soybean industry, Proceedings of the World soybean Research Conference IX, February 18-22, 2013, Durban, South Africa, 2013.

Khaliq, A., Matloob, A., Ahmed, N., Rasul, F., & Awan, I.U. (2012). Late POST emergence chemical weed control in direct seeded fine rice. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 22, 1101-1106.

Khojely, D.M., Seifeldin, E.I., Enoch, S., & Tianfu, H. (2018). History, current status, and progress of soybean production and research in sub-Saharan Africa, The Crop Journal. 2018 https://oi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2018.03.006.

Knezevic, S.Z., Evans, S.P., & Mainz, M. (2003). Row spacing influences the critical timing for weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology. 17(4), 666-673.

Labrada, R. (2002). The need for improved weed management in rice. In: Van Tran, Dat, Duffy, R. (Eds.), Sustainable Rice Production for Food Security 2003. Proceedings of the 20th Session of the International Rice Commission Bangkok, Thailand. 23–26 July 2002. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 1–11.

Oerke, E.C., & Dehne, H.E. (2004). Safeguarding production- losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot. 23, 275-285.

Osipitan, O.A., Adigun, J.A., Lagoke, S.T.O., & Afolami, S.O. (2013). Effect of inter-row spacing and weed control methods on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) in South Western Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Plant Protection. 27, 97-111.

Osipitan, O.A., Yahaya, I., & Adigun, J.A. (2018). Economics of Weed Management Methods as Influenced by Row-Spacing in Cowpea. Journal of Agricultural Science; 10(2), 1916-9760

Overfield, D., Murithi, M.F., Muthamia, J.N., Ouma, J.O., Birungi, K.F., Maina, J.M., Kibata, G.N., Musembi, F.J., Nyanyu, G., Kamidi, M., Mose, L.O., Odendo, M., Ndungu, J., Kamau, G., Kikafunda, J., & Terry, P.T. (2001) Analysis of the constraints to adoption of herbicides by smallholder maize growers in Kenya and Uganda. The BCPC Conference Weeds. (2001) 907-912.

Pannell, D.J., Marshall, G.R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., & Wilkinson, R. (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46 (11), (2006) 1407-1424.

Patil, B.C., Padanad, L.A., Yashvantkumar, K.Y., Soumya, S., & Ravi, M. (2014). Efficacy and economics of integrated weed management in vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Agriculture Update 9(1) 124-127.

Peer, F.A., Badrul lone, B.A., Qayoom, S., Ahmed, L., Khanday, B., & Singh, G. (2013). Singh, Effect of weed control methods on yield and yield attributes of Soyabean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 6135–6141.

Ronner, E., Franke, A.C., Vanlauwe, B., Diande, M., Edeh, E., Ukem, B., Bala, A., Van, J., Heerwaarden, K.E., & Giller, K.E. (2016). Understanding variability in soybean yield and response to P-fertilizer and rhizobium inoculants on farmers’ field in northern Nigeria, Field Crop Res. 186,133-145

Sepat, S., Thierfelder, C., Sharma, A.R., Pavuluri, K., Kumar, D., Iquebal, M.A., & Verma, A. (2017) Effects of weed control strategy on weed dynamics, soybean productivity and profitability under conservation agriculture in India. Field Crops Research, 210, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.017

Sodangi, I.A., Gworgwor, N.A., & Joshua, S.D. (2006). Effects of weed interference and inter-row spacing on productivity of soyabean (Glycine Max (L) Merril) in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science. 19, 33 – 40

Suria, A.S., Juraimi, M.J., Rahman, A.S, Man, M.M., & Selamat, A.B. (2011). Efficacy and economics of different herbicides in aerobic rice system. Afr. J. Biotechnology. 10, (2011), 8007-8022.

Veeramani, A., Palchamy, A., Ramasamy, S., & Rangaraju, G. (2001). Integrated Weed Management in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) under various plant densities. Madras Agric. J. 88 (7-9), 451-456

Vivian, R.A., Pablo, A.K., Vargas, L.C.C., Ferreira, F., & Mariana, G. (2013). Weed Management in Soybean - Issues and Practices in Soybean -Pest Resistance 2013 pp 50-84

Published
2019/10/29
Section
Original Scientific Paper