AUTONOMIJA VISOKOŠKOLSKOG OBRAZOVANJA U EVROPSKOJ UNIJI
Slučaj C-66/18 Evropska komisija protiv Mađarske
Sažetak
Svjesni činjenice da je autonomija važan preduslov da bi obrazovne ustanove mogle obavljati svoje zadatke, u ovom radu istražujemo i analiziramo jedan od najinteresantnijih slučajeva iz jurisprudencije Suda pravde Evropske unije u ovoj oblasti. Naime, Evropska komisija pokrenula je postupak protiv Republike Mađarske zbog kršenja prava Evropske unije. U fokusu je Zakon o visokom obrazovanju te države članice koji je izazvao oštre polemike u okviru akademske zajednice u zemljama Evropskog ekonomskog prostora, ali i u trećim zemljama. Iako je rad u pretežnom dijelu posvećen slobodnom kretanju usluga u oblasti visokog obrazovanja, neizostavno istražujemo i odnos prava Evropske unije i pravnih instrumenata Svjetske trgovinske organizacije (WTO), kao i stavove Suda pravde u pogledu njihove interpretacije. Slučaj koji obrazlažemo značajan je i za status zemalja koje pretenduju da postanu članice evropske organizacije, budući da je Evropski parlament usvojio preporuku da se u Kopenhagenške kriterijume za postupak pristupanja uvrsti odbrana i zaštita akademske slobode i institucionalne autonomije s ciljem sprečavanja njihovog ugrožavanja u državama članicama.
Reference
Ball, S & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden Privatisation in Public Education. Education International 5th World Congress, July. Posjećeno 16.02.2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228394301_Hidden_privatisation_in_public_education.
Biondi A. (2020). Module Convenor for EU Law, A discussion on Case C-66/18 Commissin v Hungary of the 6th of October 2020: Looks like an exam model answer!, November 18, 2020. Posjećeno 17.02.2021.
https://lawsblog.london.ac.uk/2020/11/18/a-discussion-on-case-c-66-18-commission-v-hungary-of-the-6th-of-oct-2020-looks-like-an-exam-model-answer/
Chaisse, J. (2015). Deconstructing the WTO Conformity Obligation: A Theory of Compliance as a Process. Fordham International Law Journal, 38(1): 62. Posjećeno 07.02.2021. URL: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj
CJEU: C-181/73 R. & V. Haegeman v Belgian State, para. 5. i 6, ECLI:EU:C:1974:41
CJEU: C-61/94 Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany, ECLI:EU:C:1996:313
CJEU: C-377/02 Léon Van Parys NV v Belgisch Interventie-enRestitutiebureau, ECLI:EU:C:2005:121
CJEU: C-120/06P i C-121/06P Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio SpA (FIAMM) and Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio Technologies LLC, Giorgio Fedon & Figli SpA and Fedon America, Inc. v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, ECLI:EU:C:2008: 476
CJEU: C-366/10 Air Transport Association of America and Others v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, para 73, ECLI:EU:C:2011: 864
CJEU: C-266/16 Western Sahara Campaign UK v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs and Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, ECLI:EU:C:2018:118
CJEU: C-620/16 European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany, ECLI:EU:C:2019: 256
CJEU: C-66/18 European Commission v Hungary, ECLI:EU:C:2020:792
CJEU: C-549/18 European Commission v Romania
CJEU: ECLI:EU:C:2020:563 Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 30 April 2019. Accord ECG UE-Canada.- EU:C:2019: 341
Council of Europe - Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1762 (2006), Academic freedom and university autonomy. Posjećeno 17.02.2021.
https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17469&lang=en
Council of EU - 94/800/EC: Council Decision (of 22 December 1994) concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994), OJ L 336, 23. 12. 1994.
Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market, OJ L 376, 27. 12. 2006.
Fanou, M. (2020). The CETA ICS and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in Opinion 1/17 – A Compass for the Future. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 22: 106–132.
Hauser, H. & Zimmermann, T. (2003), The Challenge of Reforming the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding. INTERECONOMICS – Review of European Economic Policy, 38(5): 241−245. Posjećeno 15. 02. 2021. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=666983
Lamy, P. (2007). The Place of the WTO and its Law in the International Legal Order, The European Journal of International Law, 5(17): 969−984. Posjećeno 07. 02. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl035
Morijn, J. (2006). Economic Liberalisation of Education Provision Within the EC & WTO: A Human Rights Perspective, Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy, 2(1): 99−136.
Nagy, I. (2021). Does WTO Law Protect Academic Freedom? It Depends on How You Use It, Insights – American Society of International Law, Volume: 25 (1). Posjećeno 19. 02. 2021.
https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/25/issue/1/does-wto-law-protect-academic-freedom-it-depends-how-you-use-it
Nanopoulos, E. (2013). Judicial Review of Measures Implementing Security Council Resolutions: The Relevance of the EU Principle of Loyal Cooperation. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 15: 669−697.
Paliwal, S. (2012). Strengthening the Link in Linkage: Defining ‘Development Needs’ in WTO Law. American University International Law Review, 27(1): 37−90, 2012. Posjećeno 11. 02. 2021. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1566249
Palmeter, D. & Mavroidis, P. (2004). Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization: practice and procedure, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed: 1−330.
Popović, V. i Vukadinović, R. (2007). Međunarodno poslovno pravo, Opšti deo. Kragujevac: Univerzitet za poslovne studije/Centar za pravo Evropske unije, (2): 111.
Scheppele, K. (2016). Enforcing the Basic Principles of EU Law through Systemic Infringement Actions. In C. Closa & D. Kochenov (Eds.), Reinforcing Rule of Lav Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press. 105−132.
Staničić, F. i Britvić Vetma, B. (2020). Primjena Direktive o uslugama u sistemu visokog obrazovanja. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, (1): 157−177. Posjećeno 15. 02. 2021. https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.135.157 Posjećeno: 15. 02. 2021.
The Guardian (International edition), Article: EU court rules against Hungary over law that targeted Soros-affiliated university, Associated Press Tue 6 Oct 2020 19.50 BST. Posjećeno 19.02.2021.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oct/06/top-eu-court-rules-against-hungary-on-soros-university
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel, 11 November 1997. Posjećeno 20. 02. 2021.
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13144&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (1986−1994) − Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO), OJ L 336, 23.12.1994.
Verger, A. (2010). WTO/GATS and the Global Politics of Higher Education (1st ed.): 1−248. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866672
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dijele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) prije ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmjeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka (Vidi Efekti otvorenog pristupa).