SOCIOKULTURNI ASPEKTI POLITIČKOG AKTIVIZMA: PREDLOG NOVOG MODELA
Sažetak
U ovom radu analizira se korelacija između političkog aktivizma, političke participacije i određenih vrednosnih orijentacija, kao važnih delova savremenog političkog konteksta društva. Uzorak empirijskog istraživanja u ovom radu činili su članovi vladajućih i opozicionih partija, strukturisani po godinama, mestu stanovanja, političkom opredeljenju i ulozi u lokalnim parlamentima, u šest gradova u Republici Srbiji. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju mešavinu predmodernih (tradicionalnih), modernih i postmodernih vrednosti u društvu, pri čemu su tradicionalne vrednosti i dalje veoma žive, što bi moglo da se tumači kao faktor koji značajno usporava proces socio-ekonomske tranzicije. Socio-demografske varijable i vrednosne orijentacije (autokratsko-demokratsko, tradicionalno-moderno), uz precizirane različite aspekte političke kulture, u velikoj meri određuju političko ponašanje. Model političkog aktivizma, koji je bio teorijsko-istraživačka osnova rada, bio je model socio-ekonomskog statusa. U ovom istraživanju, na osnovu dobijenih rezultata, predlaže se novi, unapređeni model, nazvan socio-kulturni model političkog aktivizma.
Reference
Altemayer, R. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Axford, B., Browning, R., Huggins, B., Rosamond, B. & Turner, J. (1997). Politics: An Introduction. Routledge, London.
Conway, M. (2001). Women and political participation. Political Science and Politics, 34(2): 231–233.
Diemer, M. (2012). Fostering Marginalized Youths Political Participation: Longitudinal Roles of Parental Political Socialization and Youth Sociopolitical Development. American Journal Community Psychology, 50: 246–256.
Farnen, R. & German, D. (1996). Central and Eastern European Elite Perspectives on Political, Communications, Educational, Economic, and Environmental Changes (1989 to 1993) In Farnen, R., Dekker, H., Meyenberg, R. and German, D. (eds.), Democracy, socialization, and conflicting loyalties in East and West: Cross-national and comparative perspectives, Macmillan Press, London.
Ferreira, F. & Gyourko, J. (2009). Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence from U.S. Cities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1): 399-422.
Fox, S. (2014). Is it time to update the definition of political participation? Political participation in Britain: The decline and revival of civic culture. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2): 495–505.
Fraussen, B. & D. Halpin (2016). Political parties and interest organizations at the crossroads: Perspectives on the transformation of political organizations. Political Studies Review, 16(1): 25-37.
Gabennesch, H. (1972). Authoritarianism as World View. American Journal of Sociology, 77(5): 857–875.
Genova, C. (2018). Youth Activism in Political Squats between Centri Sociali and Case Occupate. Societies, 8(3): 1-25.
Gibson, J. (1996). A mile wide but an inch deep: The structure of democratic commitments in the former USSR. American Journal of Political Science, 40: 396–420. Heidar, K. & Wauters, B. (2019). Do parties still represent? An analysis of the representativeness of political parties in western democracies. London: Routledge.
Huntington, S. P. & Nelson, J. M. (1976). No easy choice: Political participation in developing countries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Changing values among western public from 1970 to 2006. West European politics, 31(1-2): 130-146.
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2009). How development leads to democracy: What we know about modernization. Foreign Affairs, 88(2): 33-48.
Inglehart, R. (2010). Globalization and Postmodern Values. The Washington Quarterly, 23(1): 215–228.
Katz, R. & Mair, P. (2018). Democracy and the cartelization of political parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koo, S. (2018). Can intraparty democracy save party activism? Evidence from Korea. Party politics, 26(1): 32-42.
Kosiara-Pedersen, K., Scarrow, S.E. & Van Haute, E. (2017). Rules of engagement? Party membership costs, new forms of party affiliation, and partisan participation. In Scarrow S.E., Webb P.D. and Poguntke T. (eds.) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–258.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy. American Political Science Review, 53: 69-105.
McCloskey, H. (1958). Conservativism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52: 27–45.
Memoli, V. & Vassallo, F. (2016). Political Activism Research: Studying the Evolution of Political Behavior. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 9(1): 1-18.
Milbrath, L. & Goel, M. (1977). Political Participation. McNally College Publication Company, Chicago.
Mudge, S. & Chen, A. (2014). Political Parties and the Sociological Imagination: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 40: 305-309.
Nešić, A. (2016). Sociokulturni aspekti političkog aktivizma društva u tranziciji: primer AP Vojvodine. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu.
Nešić, A., Jozić, M., & Ostojić, A. (2019). Civic Participation in Urban Environment: Novo Naselje – an example of good practice. In: Kostreš, M., Hanson H. (Eds.) Participatory Processes in Urban Planning (pp. 214-226). Novi Sad: Faculty of Technical Sciences.
Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University, New York.
Parry, G., Moysen, G. & Day, N. (1992). Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Riley, C. E., Griffin, C. & Morey, Y. (2010). The case for everyday politics: Evaluating neotribal theory as a way to understand alternative forms of political participation, using electronic dance music culture as an example. Sociology, 44(2): 345–363.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. Basic Books, New York.
Seyd, P. & Whiteley, P. (2004). British Party Members: An Overview. Party Politics, 10(4): 355-366.
Stolle, D. & Hooghe, M. (2011). Shifting inequalities: Patterns of exclusion and inclusion in emerging forms of political participation. European Societies, 13(1): 119-142.
Teorell, J. (2006). Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda. European Journal for Political Research, 45(5): 787-810.
Triandis, H. C. & Gelfland, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 118-128.
Van Deth, J. (1997). Private Groups and Public Life. Social Participation, Voluntary Associations and Political Involvement in Representative Democracies, Routledge, London.
Van Deth, J. (2001). Studying Political Participation – Towards a Theory of Everything? Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Grenoble, 6-11 April.
Van Deth, J. (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica, 49(3): 349–367.
Vecchione, M. & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46: 487–549.
Verba, S., Nie, N. & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Verba, S., Brady, H. & Schlozman, K. (1995). Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Wengert, N. (1976). Citizen participation: practice in search of a theory. Natural resources journal, 16: 23-40.
Whiteley, P. (2011). Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics, 17(1): 21–44.
Zaller, J. (1991). Information, Values and Opinion. The American Political Science Review, 85(4): 1215-1237.
Young, L. & Cross, W. P. (2002). Incentives to membership in Canadian political parties. Political Research Quarterly, 55(33): 547–569.
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dijele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) prije ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmjeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka (Vidi Efekti otvorenog pristupa).