O VAŽNOSTI INTUICIJA U POLITIČKIM PROCESIMA U DOBA POLITIČKE APATIJE
Sažetak
U radu se istražuje teorijski značaj intuicija u političkim procesima, naročito u trenucima krize reprodukcije dominantnih društvenih normi. U tom pogledu naročita pažnja posvećuje se činjenici da su društvene institucije i konvencionalne političke organizacije danas u velikoj meri izgubile autoritet, što je pak dovelo do političke apatije i porasta postpolitičkih stavova. Političke intuicije, često bazirane na iskustvu i nesvesnim asocijacijama, shodno tome mogu igrati ključnu ulogu u radikalnim oblicima demokratije, posebno u vremenima krize. Rad se fokusira na razliku između svakodnevnih političkih intuicija i intuicija o politici, naglašavajući njihov značaj u oblikovanju javnog diskursa i političkih odluka.
Reference
Bayat, A. (2013). The Arab Spring and its Surprises. Development and Change, 44(3), 587–601.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (1st edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Bergson, H. (2022). Creative Evolution. New York: Routledge.
Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In Intuition in judgment and decision making. (pp. 3–22). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bicchieri, C., Duffy, J., & Tolle, G. (2004). Trust among Strangers. Philosophy of Science, 71(3), 286–319.
Bicchieri, C., Fatas, E., Aldama, A., Casas, A., Deshpande, I., Lauro, M., Parilli, C., Spohn, M., Pereira, P., & Wen, R. (2021). In science we (should) trust: Expectations and compliance across nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 16(6).
Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity.
Boyd, K., & Heney, D. (2017). Peirce on Intuition, Instinct, & Common Sense. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1035
Chauviré, C. (2005). Peirce, Popper, Abduction, and the Idea of a Logic of Discovery. Semiotica, 2005(153), 209–222.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: The Guilford Press.
Coleman, S. (2022). Feeling It/Not Feeling It: Mood Stories as Accounts of Political Intuition. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 35(4), 477–495.
Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.
DeScioli, P., & Bokemper, S. E. (2019). Intuitive Political Theory: People’s Judgments About How Groups Should Decide. Political Psychology, 40(3), 617–636.
Dewey, J. (1903). Studies in logical theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.
Dewey, J. (1983). The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899‒1924. Carbondale: SIU Press.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724.
Fiket, I., Pavlović, Z. & Pudar Draško, G.. 2017. Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: Kartografija nemoći. Belgrade: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Glück, J. (2019). Wisdom vs. Populism and Polarization: Learning to Regulate Our Evolved Intuitions. In Applying Wisdom to Contemporary World Problems (pp. 81–110). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Heaphy, B. (2007). Late Modernity and Social Change: Reconstructing Social and Personal Life. London: Routledge.
Holbraad, M., Kapferer, B., & Sauma, J. F. (2019). Ruptures. London: UCL Press.
Hookway, C. (2008). Epistemic Immediacy, Doubt and Anxiety: On a Role for Affective States in Epistemic Evaluation. In Epistemology and Emotions. London: Routledge.
Hunter, A. (2024). The populist impulse: Cognitive reflection, populist attitudes and candidate preferences. Electoral Studies, 92
Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Marcio, J. J. (2001). Abductive Inference, Design Science, and Dewey’s Theory of Inquiry. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 37(1), 97–121.
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. London: Routledge.
Patnam, Robert (2008). Kuglati sam. Slom i obnova američke zajednice. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
Peirce, C. S. (1974). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Pretz, J. E. (2011). Types of Intuition: Inferential and Holistic. In Handbook of Intuition Research (pp. 17–27). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ransijer, Ž. (2014). Nesaglasnost. Politika i filozofija. Beograd: Fedon.
Schmitt, C., Strong, T. B., & Strauss, L. (2007). The Concept of the Political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schudson, M. (2006). The trouble with experts – and why democracies need them. Theory and Society, 35(5), 491–506.
Sinclair, M. (2011). An Integrated Framework of Intuition. In Handbook of Intuition Research (pp. 3–16). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sinclair, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). Intuition: Myth or a Decision-making Tool? Management Learning, 36(3), 353–370.
Sorel, G. (1999). Sorel: Reflections on Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strick, M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2011). Intuition and unconscious thought. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of Intuition Research (pp. 28–36). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sukhov, A., Sihvonen, A., Netz, J., Magnusson, P., & Olsson, L. E. (2021). How experts screen ideas: The complex interplay of intuition, analysis and sensemaking. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(2), 248–270.
Thiele, L. P. (2006). 10. Making Intuition Matter. In Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method (pp. 188–206). New York University Press.
Thomas, D. C., & Inkson, K. (2017). Cultural Intelligence: Surviving and Thriving in the Global Village. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2025 Autori

Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 međunarodnom licencom.
Autori koji objavljuju u ovom časopisu pristaju na sljedeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dijele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) prije ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmjeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka (Vidi Efekti otvorenog pristupa).
