On new military technologies and concepts explored from the Syrian conflict experience

Keywords: military technology, innovation and testing, military concepts, combat experience, Syrian conflict

Abstract


Introduction/purpose: The purpose of this paper is to presents some tendencies stemming from the experiences from the ongoing Syrian conflict towards the development of new military concepts and technologies. The manner, scope and dynamics of exploitation of the combat experience from the Syrian conflict is a good example how great powers improve the capabilities of their defense systems. 

Methods: An extensive content analysis of selected reference sources has been applied. The system approach was used for a structural and balanced presentation of the available information. The comparative analysis has confirmed some similarities  in the behavior of the great powers in terms of deploying and  testing complex combat systems of strategic importance in local wars. Inductive thinking has contributed to the synthesis of appropriate conclusions.  

Results: Among the presence of several great and regional powers heavily involved in this conflict, Russia's is considered to be the most dominant and as such is the main subject of investigation in this paper. Field testing of new military equipment is known to be important but of extreme importance is its testing under real combat conditions. In parallel with intensive testing of a wide range of military technologies, there are indicators of developing new concepts, doctrines, and organizational upgrades on the basis of the Syrian combat experiences.

Conclusion: From the standpoint of military technology and concept development, the Russian endeavor in Syria has become an example of a comprehensive and systematic aproach to learning, training, innovations, and implementations of the most relevant factors in the development of a modern military organization as a response to challenges of contemporary armed conflicts.

References

Adamsky, D. 2018. Moscow’s Syria Campaign: Russian Lessons for the Art of Strategy. Russie.Nei.Visions, 109, July [online]. Available at: https://www.ifri.org/en/publications/notes-de-lifri/russieneivisions/moscows-syria-campaign-russian-lessons-art-strategy [Accessed: 1 April 2021]. ISBN: 978-2-36567-890-2.

Adamsky, D. 2020. Russian Lessons from the Syrian Operation and the Culture of Military Innovation. Garmisch-Partenkirchen: European Center for Security Studies „George C. Marshall“, Security Insight report No.047.

Bendett, S. 2019. The Rise of Russia's Hi-Tech Military. Fletcher Security Review, 6(1), Summer, pp.6-14 [online]. Available at: https://www.fletchersecurity.org/summer-2019-military-technologies [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Blank, S.J. 2019. The Russian Military in Contemorary Perspective. Strategic Studies Institute. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Press.

Bunker, R.J. 2015. Terrorist and Insurgent Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Use, Potentials, and Military Implications. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College [online]. Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_facbooks/50/ [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

-Center for Analysis of Strategies and Techniques (CAST). 2020. Russian UAV in Syria [online]. Available at: http://cast.ru/eng/products/articles/russian-uavs-in-syria.html/ [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Clark, M. 2021. The Russian Military’s Lessons Learned In Syria. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of War [online]. Available at: http://www.understandingwar.org/report/russian-military%E2%80%99s-lessons-learned-syria [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Hagelin, B. 2004. Science- and technology-based military innovation: the United States and Europe. Solna, Sweden: SIPRI Yearbook 2004: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, pp.285-304.

-International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). 2021. The Military Balance 2021. London, UK: Routledge & CRC Press. ISBN: 9781032012278.

Jones, S.G. 2020. Moscow's War in Syria. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies and Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield [online]. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/moscows-war-syria [Accessed: 1 April 2021]. ISBN: 978-1-5381-4015-4 (pb); 978-1-5381-4016-1 (eBook).

Lambeth, B.S. 2001. NATO's Air War for Kosovo: A Strategic and Operational Assessment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7249/MR1365.

McDermott, R. 2020. Tracing Russia's Path to Network-Centric Military Capability. Jamestown Foundation, Programm: Russia's Path to the High-Tech Battlespace, 4 December [online]. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/tracing-russias-path-to-network-centric-military-capability/ [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Nikolic, N. 2017. Tandem Queueing Concept in Improving Command & Control Process in Hybrid Environment. In: XLIV International Symposium on Operational Research “SYM-OP-IS-2017”, Zlatibor, Serbia, pp.675-680, September 25-28 [online]. Available at: http://symopis.vggs.rs/razno/Zbornik_radova_SYM-OP-IS_2017.pdf [Accessed: 1 April 2021]. ISBN: 978-86-7488-135-4.

Nikolic, N. 2018. Strengthening defense research as part of higher military education for future security challenges. Security and Defense Quarterly, 21(4), pp.58-72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.5181.

Nikolić, N. 2016. Conceptualizing Simulation for Lawson’s Model of Command and Control Processes. In: 7th International Scientific Conference on Defensive Technologies OTEH, Belgrade, pp.446-450, October 6-7.

O'Hanlon, M. 2019. Forecasting Change in Military Technology, 2020-2040. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution [e-book]. Available at: https://www.worldpittsburgh.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Forecasting-change-in-military-technology-2020-2040-Brookings-2018.pdf [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Pronk, D. 2020. Lessons Learned in the Levant: Russia's Arms in the Syrian Conflict. Clingendael Magazine, May [online]. Available at: https://www.clingendael.org/publication/russias-arms-syrian-conflict [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Ramm, A. 2019. The Russian Army: Operations and Modernizations. CNA Analysis Solutions, October [online]. Available at: https://www.cna.org/CNA_files/PDF/IOP-2019-U-021801-Final.pdf [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Roland, A. 2009. War and Technology. Program on Teaching Innovation. Foreign policy research institute, 27 February [online]. Available at: https://www.fpri.org/article/2009/02/war-and-technology/ [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Schimd, J. 2018. The Determinants of Military Technology Innovation and diffusion. Ph.D. thesis. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology [online]. Available at: https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/59877 [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Thomas, T. 2020. Russian Lessons Learned in Syria: An Assessment. MITRE Center for Technology and National Security, June [online]. Available at: https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/publications/pr-19-3483-russian-lessons-learned-in-syria.pdf [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Urcosta, R.B. 2020. The Revolution in Drone Warfare: The Lessons from the Idlib De-Escalation Zone. Journal of European, Middle Eastern, & African Affairs, August 31 [online]. Available at: https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JEMEAA/Display/Article/2329510/the-revolution-in-drone-warfare-the-lessons-from-the-idlib-de-escalation-zone/ [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Yaacoub, J-P., Noura, H., Saman, O. & Chehab, A. 2020. Security analysis of drone systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations. Internet of Things, 11(art.number:100218). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218.

Waller, J.K. 2020. Airpower Theory And Hybrid Warfare: Warden's Five Rings. Masters thesis. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University [online]. Available at: https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/62790 [Accessed: 1 April 2021].

Published
2021/06/17
Section
Original Scientific Papers